Religious beliefs and rules
about contraceptive use, abortions, gender roles and the importance of the family are associated with fertility rates [120,121].
Health Canada has supported this policy on the grounds that «pharmacists are well - positioned to play a major role in... providing counselling
about contraceptive options.»
Specifically, we need to educate women
about their contraceptive choices (many don't know about IUDs, and those who do are often misinformed about their safety and effectiveness), make them available at no cost to the recipient, and train the medical community on the best clinical practices.
«There is an ongoing national debate
about contraceptive coverage requirements in private health plans in the U.S.,» says lead author Michelle Moniz, M.D., an OB / GYN and researcher at the University of Michigan Medical School and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation clinical scholar.
«Women need accurate information about their coverage and
about their contraceptive options so that they can obtain whatever contraceptive method best meets their needs.
I'm so tired of people whining and complaining
about contraceptives and their purposes... whether it be for family plannign issues OR to treat a «medical condition» for women that just an't suck it up and toughen up.
We can either withhold information
about contraceptives or throw a condom parade.
This is not
about contraceptives.
Do you really think someone comes here for information
about contraceptives?
For, in a day when our new knowledge
about contraceptives and sexual technique is supposed to pave the way to the pleasures of sex without anxiety and guilt, people are experiencing a gnawing disappointment, a new anxiety.
This isn't
about contraceptives.
We are talking
about contraceptives and abortions correct?
THe discussion cant be had
about contraceptives for other reasons because the mandate is not about that.
Problem all fixed, just worry
about contraceptives, never mind us.
Anyway it made me question why they were quick to jump to talking
about contraceptives.
Researchers surveyed those women again after they had reviewed the fact sheet and found significant improvement in knowing
about contraceptives.
Women enrolled in Intervention 2 received the same care as the first intervention, as well as education
about contraceptives through an online media campaign.
We are all entitled to the most correct and up - to - date scientific information available
about all contraceptives.
If you'd like more information
about contraceptives and their uses, contact Planned Parenthood, where a clinician can provide you with more information about birth control pills and other contraceptive choices.
But when young people choose not to abstain from sexual intercourse and when they do not have accurate information
about contraceptives, including where to obtain them and how to use them they are also facing serious sexual health risks (e.g., unintended pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections) that will affect their future as adults.
Not exact matches
The same mix of science and conviction is central to editor - at - large Kimberly Weisul's feature
about Saundra Pelletier, CEO of Evofem, maker of a breakthrough
contraceptive gel.
It's important to speak with your doctor
about any concerns you may have, and he or she can help you weigh your
contraceptive options.
A survey released Tuesday from the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life found that among Catholics who have heard
about the issue, 55 % support giving religious institutions that object to birth control an exemption from the federal
contraceptive rule, while 39 % oppose exempting those institutions.
Emergency
contraceptives were there when I was uncertain
about whether I'd become pregnant and needed reassurance.
It's not
about the «right» to use
contraceptives.
In asking Catholics to be more like
contraceptive - accepting Protestants, critics have been forgetting what Christian theologians across centuries had to say
about contraception until practically the day before yesterday.
John Jenkins of Notre Dame and John Garvey of Catholic University, for a missed opportunity to speak the whole truth to power
about the proposed new HHS mandate that would force all health insurers to cover abortifacient drugs under the rubric of «
contraceptives» in «preventive» health coverage for women.
I bet poor old Billly Graham is wishing he would have used
contraceptives about now.
Many worry
about their own «sexual orientation» especially in a culture saturated with pornographic images and obsessed with discussions which assume a
contraceptive mentality in which sex and procreation are wholly separated.
Bottom line: To reduce health insurance costs and to not be subject to Obama care regulations
about supplying
contraceptives, the Catholics should simply not hire those in need of
contraceptives and fire those who demand such coverage.
Similarly, I am unhappy
about Papal ditherings over clerical celibacy and the use of
contraceptives.
Not the RCC's biggest fan, but to their credit, studies (albeit limited studies) have given Natural Family Planning (a RCC - approved method of
contraceptive) is
about 99 % effective - just as good as the Pill or a condom, and is far less expensive.
If Santorum is the nominee and wins the Presidency, then Catholic hospitals won't have to worry
about offering
contraceptives to their employees via health plans.
Good thing
about being a priest or bishop, no need to worry
about pesky
contraceptives when all you do is molest little boys.
Because the birth control cases all focus on a 1993 federal law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, not the Constitution, the Justices will face questions
about whether the mandate to provide free access to 20 forms of birth control drugs or devices, sterilization, screenings, and counseling imposes a «substantial burden» on religious freedom of nonprofit employers with religious objections to some or all
contraceptives, whether the mandate in fact serves a «compelling interest» of the government, and whether an attempt to provide an exemption from the mandate satisfies the requirement that such an accommodation is «the least restrictive means» of achieving the government's policy interest.
What
about it should female seex slaves in Africa bee given
contraceptives?
There may be some resistance to the idea that their own
contraceptive practice is a significant problem but being a parent can bring
about a remarkable capacity for conversion.
Bottom line: To reduce health insurance costs and to not be subject to Obama care regulations
about supplying
contraceptives, Catholic groups should simply not hire those in need of
contraceptives and fire those who demand such coverage.
In other words, these lawyers and judges would agree that the government «should bear the burden of showing that there is something deeply unreasonable
about the understanding [of the moral implications of
contraceptive drugs] maintained by the Greens.»
She stated the Hobby Lobby ruling isn't just
about 4 forms of
contraceptives.
Maybe she should stop worrying
about where she get
contraceptives and get a degree!
Of course, we do need to be concerned
about the problem of venereal disease still with us and
about the side effects of
contraceptives.
Hormone changes due to induced abortion may indeed be related to breast cancer, but there are other known causes of hormone changes that we should worry
about, including the widespread use of chemical
contraceptives, fertility drugs that cause hormone surges, increased obesity and fat content in the diet that change the body's estrogen metabolism, and last but not least, chemical contaminants in the environment that mimic estrogen....
Hey, I posted
about an hour ago, in support of the Church's position and my own personal right to buy coverage without the
contraceptive requirement.
If its
about providing
contraceptives to people that can't afford it — the government has a long history of providing services to people who can't afford it.
So, instead of all the Catholic insti.tutions being up - in - arms
about paying for
contraceptives, you have a good portion of the entire country up - in - arms because their taxes are paying for
contraceptives.
What
about the Christian woman who work for Hobby Lobby who want
contraceptive coverage?
In the coming years, as today's young men and women take up their responsibilities and seek to make sense of the world, it will not be adequate if Catholics who are worried - as we all ought to be -
about the sexual mayhem that has been created in recent years simply denounce the evils of extreme feminism or even of the ghastly
contraceptive, anti-life culture with which it has been associated.
Bottom line: To reduce health insurance costs and to not be subject to Obama care regulations
about supplying
contraceptives, Catholic groups should simply not hire those who want
contraceptives and fire those who demand such coverage.
No - one is forcing
contraceptives on you, if you don't agree... don't use them but don't expect everyone else to follow your lead - some people actually care
about the world they reside in and know that we are responsible for keeping it together.