Their works raise questions
about culture and religion, space and time, while blending collective memories and religious traditions with the unique, temporary and physical experience anchored in the here - and - now.
Since you are going to build relationship with a person who does not belong to your race, it will be wise for you to gain some knowledge
about their culture and religion.
Do you know that Christians are always possessive and concerned
about their culture and religion?
We seek to educate students
about cultures and religions from around the world.
Not exact matches
Emma Green — The Atlantic: Emma Green is Managing Editor of The Atlantic
and writes
about religion and culture.
what you believe is not «biblically based», it's indoctrination
about ideas that came from warping
and exagerating ideas that existed in «pagan» (not actually the correct term but good for this purpose) mythologies,
and the evil imaginations of men like Dante
and those who desired to see those they considered inferior in doctrine, belief,
religion or
culture in torture.
The struggle is that
religion in media can create a barrier between Christian
culture and those who do not know
about Christ.
It's
about respecting the
religion and culture of others... including your enemies.
We are seeing several foundational truths from Genesis 2
about how to understand life, theology, Scripture, society,
religion,
and culture.
We have far too many who aren't willing to stand for what is right
and oppose what is wrong in our society
and culture... This pastors «vision» sounds too much like the world John Lennon wrote
about in his song «imagine» where there is no God
and «no
religion».
Digital utopias disagree with those who worry
about scenarios of worldwide cultural homogenisation, they see the emergence of new
and creative lifestyles, vastly extended opportunities for different
cultures to meet
and understand each other,
and the creation of new virtual communities that easily cross all the traditional borderlines of age, gender, race,
and religion.
They were not very interested in feminism, not very sensitive to Christian anti-Judaism, not much interested in
culture or in primal
and Eastern
religions, not particularly concerned
about the repression of the body,
and so forth.
And the cultural and legal power of the Protestant culture often stifled differing views about religion, gender, and sexuali
And the cultural
and legal power of the Protestant culture often stifled differing views about religion, gender, and sexuali
and legal power of the Protestant
culture often stifled differing views
about religion, gender,
and sexuali
and sexuality.
Such is the larger context in which we are invited to think
about religion,
culture,
and secularization.
Another thing that I did not like
about this church were their extreme prejudices towards other
religions and even races
and cultures.
My friends
and i go to a christian church
and some of the Muslim students have gone with us just to see
and learn for them selves what it is like instead of going off rumors
and here say... Unless you have experiences something on your own you have no right to talk smack
about it... The reason the world is the way it is is because people are to stuck up THEIR butts
and THEIR way, to even try
and become educated
about anything else... im not saying convert or change your ways... But be educated
about something before you talk because if your not you really look like a fool... ever
religion, race,
culture,... they have their good people
and they have their bad people
and you CAN NOT judge a whole race,
religion,
culture... off one group... that just being single minded!!!
That's exactly why you don't know much
about other
religions cultures... etc
and do not respect them at all.
Who that person is
and what he or she may think
about religion are thus weighty questions, not just for science
and the academy, but also for communities of belief,
and indeed, the entire moral
and spiritual fabric of our
culture.
The
culture seeps into the church, bringing with it a
religion without commitment; spirituality without content; aspiration
and talk
and longing, fulfillment
and needs, but not much concern
about God.
All
religions including Christianity, all
cultures and all secular ideologies are in informal
and formal dialogues
about what is the meaning of our common humanity
and about the path of common action - responses to the situation from their respective understanding of the nature
and destiny of the human selfhood.
Your implication that all religious believers are morally bankrupt is a bit of an extreme position,
and one which perpetuates simplistic stereotypes at exactly the time when we need to think more critically
and deeply
about religion in this
culture.
And it is about the way religion and television are today acting, interacting, and reacting over the question of who will shape the faith and value system of our culture in the future, and what the shape of that worldview will
And it is
about the way
religion and television are today acting, interacting, and reacting over the question of who will shape the faith and value system of our culture in the future, and what the shape of that worldview will
and television are today acting, interacting,
and reacting over the question of who will shape the faith and value system of our culture in the future, and what the shape of that worldview will
and reacting over the question of who will shape the faith
and value system of our culture in the future, and what the shape of that worldview will
and value system of our
culture in the future,
and what the shape of that worldview will
and what the shape of that worldview will be.
The challenge of Islam, however, does force us to think in new ways, particularly
about the relation between
religion and culture.
In the Christian Institute for the Study - of Religion
and Society there was an open discussion
about a proposal that since Christ transcended not only
cultures but also
religions and ideologies, the fellowship of confessors of faith in Jesus as the Messiah should not separate from their original religious or secular ideological community but should form fellowships of Christian faith in those communities themselves,
and that so long as the Law sees baptism as transference from one community to another it should not be made the condition of entry into the fellowship of the sacrament of the Lord's Supper but made a sacramental privilege for a later time (Ref.
This is not
about a
religion or
culture, there is only ONE path to SALVATION
and that is ONLY by believing in JESUS CHRIST as your Lord
and Savior.
He spoke of the prestige of science in our
culture and the corresponding lack of respect for
religion («If it's a science programme it's a documentary, if the subject's politics there's a debate, but a religious programme, unless it's hymns for granny, will have people talking
about their feelings»).
No, because the end justify s the means
and you have already made up your mind that you are right
about Jesus
and there can be no other truth,
and it's never
about learning more
about different people
and cultures and religions, it's
about making sure anyone who is different knows you are a Christian which is the only sensible way to live
and anyone who is not like you is either converted, attacked, pitied or dismissed as a fool who awaits eternal damnation.
The questions
about religion and public life, those calling for «public» discussion, no longer focus on the verifiability of religious speech but concern quite other issues: methods of understanding
and describing the religious realities, old
and new, that we see appearing around us; useful criteria for assessing these
religions and for defining
and comprehending this new set of powers in our public life;
and ways of protecting vital religious groups from the excesses of the public reaction to them,
and protecting the public from the excesses of powerful religious groups — hardly questions a secular
culture had thought it would have to take seriously!
If you'd like to get together with serious - minded people who want to talk
about religion,
culture,
and public life, please get in touch.
And the further interesting thing is that the forms of religion that are more bizarre or alien to modern Western «scientific» culture — astrology, occultism, Zen, yoga, Sufism — appeal to the «intelligentsia» and so ironically tend to cluster about our contemporary university centers (the remaining seats of that cultur
And the further interesting thing is that the forms of
religion that are more bizarre or alien to modern Western «scientific»
culture — astrology, occultism, Zen, yoga, Sufism — appeal to the «intelligentsia»
and so ironically tend to cluster about our contemporary university centers (the remaining seats of that cultur
and so ironically tend to cluster
about our contemporary university centers (the remaining seats of that
culture).
If you want to be «scientific» you also have to be agnostic
about all the other gods,
and about vampires, werewolves, dragons, ogres, leprechauns,
and pretty much everything else from all the world's
cultures and religions.
Those who work in theological education are also aware, however, that we must also avoid intellectual or spiritual tourism — the tendency to explore the range
and quaintness of the world's wondrous variety without asking
about the truth - claims of various
cultures, without attempting to discern the relative justice of alternative social practices, or without seeking commonalities that may overarch multiple lands
and religions.
Because we don't have the capacity
and time to teach them
about everything, we teach them the tools on how to separate right from wrong
and know this is something in
culture that you don't have to follow
and this is something that you should adopt because it is aligned with your
religion.
Like our founder, Richard John Neuhaus, we believe that public life is ultimately shaped by
culture and religion — our ideas
about the first
and highest things — rather than clever soundbites or wonky white papers.
There are many theologians of
religion and the whole church, of faith
and of
culture, but very few who have had much to say
about the dynamics of belief within the setting of the local congregation.
@Patty et all, How do you live your lives in such fear everyday... you have been so brainwashed
about other people,
cultures and religions, I'm surprised no reports of increased from fear craving people have not committed suicide or have had heart attaches or stocks.
= > you do nt believe in the God of Israel because «it is a prison of the mind based on
culture and circvmstance» That does nt make any sense, you are talking
about the inst.i.tutions of
religion, not the God of Israel.
In addition to witty commentary on
religion and culture, Zack writes thoughtful
and accessible reflections on theology, as well as deeply personal, engaging stories like this one
about the news that he
and his wife are expecting.
Hard conversations are coming, perhaps legislation, around gun control,
about hatred, racism,
religion,
about our
culture's glorification of violence, our nationalism,
and the divisions between us, yes, those conversations need to happen, but not just now: now is the time for grieving, now is the time for loving, for burying, for mourning with those who mourn, for gathering humanity together,
and for compassion.
And what are the best ways for Christians to talk about and live their faith in a culture that thinks sex and chores are more important to family life than religi
And what are the best ways for Christians to talk
about and live their faith in a culture that thinks sex and chores are more important to family life than religi
and live their faith in a
culture that thinks sex
and chores are more important to family life than religi
and chores are more important to family life than
religion?
The gospel always comes wrapped in a particular language, particular customs
and traditions
and ways of doing things, particular unwritten rules
about politics
and religion and the family — in other words, in a particular
culture.
Alex McFarland, the Christian director of Worldview
and Apologetics at North Greenville University, holds regular public debates with Silverman
about God
and the place of
religion in American
culture.
This is a blog concerned with the material
culture of
religion,
and as a general rule, I don't write
about politics.
In describing
and accounting for the lives of the Religious Right, which we define simply as religious conservatives with a considerable involvement in political activity, the book
and the series tell the story primarily by focusing on leading episodes in the movement's history, including, but not limited to, the groundwork laid by Billy Graham in his relationships with presidents
and other prominent political leaders; the resistance of evangelical
and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964; a battle over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's —
and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976
and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority
and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality
and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency
and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson
and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the
culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections;
and, finally, by addressing crucial questions
about the appropriate relationship between
religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church
and state.
They are seeking what has been called post-modern paradigms for «an open secular democratic
culture» within the framework of a public philosophy (Walter Lippman) or Civil Religion (Robert Bellah) or a new genuine realistic humanism or at least a body of insights
about the nature of being
and becoming human, evolved through dialogue among renascent
religions, secularist ideologies including the philosophies of the tragic dimension of existence
and disciplines of social
and human sciences which have opened themselves to each other in the context of their common sense of historical responsibility
and common human destiny.
The Christian contribution in this context should be in relation to the struggle of India to develop, through dialogue among the many
religions,
cultures and philosophies, a body of common insights
about being
and becoming human, that is, a common framework of humanism which will humanize the spirit of modernity
and the process of modernization.
Last, since I exist in the United States in 2013, am white,
and have never been Jewish, I doubt that I do a great job getting in the mindset of, for instance, Paul, without looking to other resources that would help me understand a bit
about his
culture (s),
religion,
and times.
It is one thing to be open to the world
and learn
about other
religions and cultures, but it certainly is another to constantly defend them to show that you are the open minded educated American.
All these show that ours is a historical context conducive, not only to inter-religious but also to
religion - ideology dialogues on building a common body of insights
about being
and becoming human - a dialogue in which Christianity can make a contribution from its idea of reconciliation of humanity
and the creation of a Secular Koinonia across
religions,
cultures and ideologies.
He made a few remarks
about how Dallas's view of things reflected a general antipathy among some evangelicals toward contemporary
culture, but I was still puzzled, given Balmer's criticism, as to why anyone would find this kind of
religion attractive,
and I wished our guide had helped us to see that a little better.