Sentences with phrase «about divorce when»

Nobody wants to think about divorce when they are thinking about getting married.

In a culture with high divorce rates and widespread concerns about the fragility of marriage, perhaps it is hard not to have some thoughts about divorce when problems and disappointments arise in marriage.

I know it is hard to think about divorce when those around you disapprove.

No one talks about divorce when a marriage is solid, stable and happy.

No one wants to think about divorce when they are getting married.

And I am also cognizant that they are parents to two young children, Apple, 9, and Moses, 7 — most of us have feelings about divorce when the couple's children are so young.

For instance, one survey of pastoral care counselors — 62 percent of whom are mainline clergy — found that only 50 percent are more cautious about divorce when children are involved, in contrast to 74 percent of secularly trained family psychiatrists.

David — because it's seems disingenuous (to me at least) to say that this isn't about a divorce when the entire narrative context is in fact about a divorce.

Another wife, who talked about divorcing when her children were young, says now, «He is my soul mate.

Not exact matches

Having a conversation about what you want if things don't work out as planned often helps couples have a more reasonable discussion when divorce hits.

They say in any divorce there is a moment when you have to raise your eyes up to the horizon line and start thinking about what comes next.

When the co-owners talk about divorce, employees understandably worry and feel stressed about the future of the business and their jobs.

If you know anything about Robbins's personal story, however, you might know that his childhood was pretty rough: His parents divorced when he was 7 years old.

Her parents, Sheila and Bill Gregory, divorced when she was about 4, leaving her largely in the care of her mother.

When he had to squeeze extra floors into a new building, he called Sandy Lindenbaum, a zoning - law guru who called himself «the last of the gunslingers»; when he needed the New Jersey Casino Control Commission to see things his way, he turned to Atlantic City fixture Nick Ribis; when he wanted to divorce Ivana (and, later on, her successor, Marla Maples), he retained Jay Goldberg, a self - described «killer» who says he can «rip skin off a body»; when it was tax time, he reversed decades of bragging about his billions and had tax attorneys say his properties were worth only a fraction of what he had publicly proclaimed (an ongoing tax appeal in Chicago declares Trump Tower Chicago «a failed business»); when he was in the market for a troubleshooter, he hired Michael Cohen, who has threatened journalists who've written about Trump with bodily hWhen he had to squeeze extra floors into a new building, he called Sandy Lindenbaum, a zoning - law guru who called himself «the last of the gunslingers»; when he needed the New Jersey Casino Control Commission to see things his way, he turned to Atlantic City fixture Nick Ribis; when he wanted to divorce Ivana (and, later on, her successor, Marla Maples), he retained Jay Goldberg, a self - described «killer» who says he can «rip skin off a body»; when it was tax time, he reversed decades of bragging about his billions and had tax attorneys say his properties were worth only a fraction of what he had publicly proclaimed (an ongoing tax appeal in Chicago declares Trump Tower Chicago «a failed business»); when he was in the market for a troubleshooter, he hired Michael Cohen, who has threatened journalists who've written about Trump with bodily hwhen he needed the New Jersey Casino Control Commission to see things his way, he turned to Atlantic City fixture Nick Ribis; when he wanted to divorce Ivana (and, later on, her successor, Marla Maples), he retained Jay Goldberg, a self - described «killer» who says he can «rip skin off a body»; when it was tax time, he reversed decades of bragging about his billions and had tax attorneys say his properties were worth only a fraction of what he had publicly proclaimed (an ongoing tax appeal in Chicago declares Trump Tower Chicago «a failed business»); when he was in the market for a troubleshooter, he hired Michael Cohen, who has threatened journalists who've written about Trump with bodily hwhen he wanted to divorce Ivana (and, later on, her successor, Marla Maples), he retained Jay Goldberg, a self - described «killer» who says he can «rip skin off a body»; when it was tax time, he reversed decades of bragging about his billions and had tax attorneys say his properties were worth only a fraction of what he had publicly proclaimed (an ongoing tax appeal in Chicago declares Trump Tower Chicago «a failed business»); when he was in the market for a troubleshooter, he hired Michael Cohen, who has threatened journalists who've written about Trump with bodily hwhen it was tax time, he reversed decades of bragging about his billions and had tax attorneys say his properties were worth only a fraction of what he had publicly proclaimed (an ongoing tax appeal in Chicago declares Trump Tower Chicago «a failed business»); when he was in the market for a troubleshooter, he hired Michael Cohen, who has threatened journalists who've written about Trump with bodily hwhen he was in the market for a troubleshooter, he hired Michael Cohen, who has threatened journalists who've written about Trump with bodily harm.

It is often said that those who are concerned about the social and personal effects of divorce are nostalgic for the 1950s, yearning for a mythical time when....

Our re-connection is not important but what I wanted to tell you is that when I told the wife about this thread, and that «Tony Jones» ex-wife is telling her story... I guess they got divorced?

Colina — What David said is true — you keep trying to control the narrative by pulling the conversation back to it being about a «divorce», when nobody really talked about that at all until you initially brought it up, then David addressed it (everyone else ignored it because obviously they weren't interested in the «sordid details»), and you again directed the conversation (attempted to direct it) right BACK to an over simplification of it being about the divorce between two people!

When Christians are ready to follow Jesus» teaching on divorce, we can then begin to talk about what the rest of the Bible says about homosexuality.

Jesus made that exact point when asked about a bill of divorce.

But if it doesn't — like when it talks about the anger of God, or repentance, or gay sex, or divorce — then we can emphasise its humanness, point out the limited knowledge of the writer, explain how they came to be so silly, and move beyond the text to a supposedly higher ethical standard.

It is important to remember when Jesus is teaching about adultery in Matthew chapter 19 that what he is saying is that if someone divorces for any reason other than adultery that the offending party has only two choices reconcile with their spouse or remain single and live as a widow the rest of their days.

Jesus gave a clear thought about what marriage should look like.The one warning He gave was for a man to give his a written notice of divorce if his wife commits fornication.And the only thing the bible speaks against is when some wears tardy clothes as a sign of gayism and the bible refutes that tremendiously.

Joe and I actually made a new vow when we signed our divorce papers, «to speak and act in loving ways toward one another and about one another,» for the sake of the children and for our own wholeness, for the rest of our lives.

When free speech is divorced from God, people feel they have the right to say any mean and nasty thing they want about other people.

He gave priority to love of God and neighbor when questioned about family, marriage, and divorce.

And when Jesus was quizzed about divorce on the basis of Deuteronomy 24:1 - 4 (Mark 10:2 - 9), he subordinated that passage as a concession to hard - heartedness and lifted up the Genesis accounts affirming the indissolubility of the marriage union (Gen. 1:27; 2:24; 5:2) as the expression of God's will.

That means that when he gets to the difficult passages, whether it be about the sin or divorce, the sin of sodomy, or the sin of unbelief, he will teach on all of it.

2) Create the straw man that this is about «divorce» when most of the comments are about the abuse of power.

Why do so many advocate making gay marriage illegal but not divorce, when Jesus never referenced the former but spoke quite negatively about the latter?

(Mark 12: 28 - 31) When he was asked about divorce, he again appealed to two passages of the Law (Gen. 1: 27 and 2: 24): «Man and woman He created them; therefore a man will leave father and mother, and the two become one flesh.»

What I find puzzling is the obsession with consensual and faithful gay relationships when Scripture says much more about divorce and remarriage (every single sex act with a second spouse is ALWAYS adultery unless someone is unfaithful and that the only moral choice is reconciliation with your first spouse or lifetime celibacy — 1 Cor 7:10 - 11), charging interest on a loan, our moral obligation toward the poor and other things most conservative Christians ignore.

Jesus himself had to remind his hearers of this when they questioned him about divorce, which in his day meant putting aside a wife you didn't want any more: «for your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so» (Matthew 19:8).

When challenged about the lawfulness of divorce, Jesus cited Genesis, stating clearly that the human act of joining together in marriage is at the same time God's work.

Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?

Duff knows plenty about shouldering loads: His father, Warren, died when Vontez was two, and after his mother, Wynoka, remarried and later divorced, Vontez took care of his three younger siblings while his mom worked long hours at a juvenile detention center.

If there's one thing almost all of us can agree on when it comes to divorce it's worrying about the kids: How will divorce impact them?

When I was approached by Susan Pease Gadoua to help write The New I Do: Reshaping Marriage for Skeptics, Realists and Rebels, I grilled her about her approach to marriage and divorce, and her background.

As I'm freshly going through my second divorce, the number one thing I have learned is that I should have spoken up more when I didn't like her behavior and instead of getting cross about her having secret friends, I should have raised why those actions were inappropriate.

i know i watched her turn into someone that i did nt even know.so now, all i have to choose from in my age group is the same thing i divorced.and in divorces 9 times out of 10, the women ends up financially better off, and bragg about how independent they are.LMAO, ofcoarse, u got the house, the kidz, the 401 k, child support, alimony the vehicles etc. need i say more.if they arent crazy when you get with them, they will be when they hit midlife.

What is it with men, when I was younger no one wanted anything serious because I was divorced with children, by the time I was in my 30s no one wanted a serious relationship then either because I was a promo model and they didn't like other men looking at me (the exception being creeps who did nt care about me they just wanted a trophy wife or those who wanted «good breeding stock»), now my kids are grown and I have my own business no one wants anything serious because I'm «too old».

For instance, if all of the strong and intelligent women I loved growing up appeared to be at their happiest when they were divorced or widowed, how did that shape my views about (not to mention my behavior during), my marriage?

When I divorced in my 20s as a childfree woman, no one flipped out about it.

So where does that leave us when it comes to listening to your parents about your marriage or divorce?

I've been married and divorced twice, but when I divorced the first time — in my 20s, with no children — I never paid attention to any articles about reinventing myself as a divorcee.

Astro and Danielle Teller's book Sacred Cows: The Truth About Divorce and Marriage also questions the status quo when it comes to marriage and divorce; as they told me, «society, rightly or wrongly, believes it will get what it wants if it gets people to get married and stay mDivorce and Marriage also questions the status quo when it comes to marriage and divorce; as they told me, «society, rightly or wrongly, believes it will get what it wants if it gets people to get married and stay mdivorce; as they told me, «society, rightly or wrongly, believes it will get what it wants if it gets people to get married and stay married.

When she told him she was scared, that she was thinking about a divorce, he agreed — he wasn't going to get better any time soon.

Rather than go on an on about my own reactions to divorce — and I am on the record for strongly believing that there should be no shame or judgment when it come to divorce, nor should it be seen as a «failure» — I'd rather hear what you have to say.

When Bowman ran a small group for children with recently separated or divorced parents, she used a rain - and - sun analogy by asking about the positives and negatives of the new family structure.

When it comes to divorce, everyone is concerned about the kids.