Sentences with phrase «about doctrine»

I don't blog about those doctrines directly much anymore.
After hearing him speak, some of them had a better opinion of him and wanted to learn more about his doctrine.
Plus, when you feel accepted, you will feel happier and better about the doctrine that you're learning.
There continues to be a flood of publication about the doctrine — some of it good and some, to be sure, not so good.
The problem is that while the gospel does contain doctrine, the gospel is not primarily about doctrine.
I wonder sometimes at why, and it may be as you said, that people would rather comment on a post about doctrine and theology.
It is not neutral about the doctrine or beliefs of the church, however, and doesn't need to apologize for that.
Be that as it may, there is nothing secondary about the doctrine treated here.
But there is something off about their doctrine and it comes shining clearly in this movie.
After three years there, I wrote a post on this blog about some doctrines and theological ideas I was reading about and investigating.
Until then, what do you think about the doctrine of Total Depravity as expressed above?
Theology is important — we need to strive to understand God, but we must strive to do so with the purpose of knowing Him more and loving Him more, not so that we can participate in debates about doctrine.
We argue about doctrine which Jesus did not give us, we use it to control and be powerful, that is why people argue and bully.
Come on, Riley, you have to know that there is disagreement over just about every doctrine in Christianity.
Now the outside community is our Church, We have a group of like minded people who meet together once a month to fellowship and to care about our community, we don't care about your doctrine or if you have one, other than «love, compassion and justice for all».
I would never expect a nonmember of this church to understand enough about its doctrine to make an honest assessment of anything other than superficial, publicized topics.
There are so many areas where sincere and godly people disagree about doctrines that are mutually exclusive.
And yet, I'm left feeling confused and unsatisfied about doctrines like sin, the Fall, salvation, etc..
Calvinism, of course, has its own sectarian edges: it can degenerate into a graceless polemic about the doctrine of grace with little evidence of the reality of the thing argued about.
The Bible has just as much to say about this doctrine as it does about Jesus» resurrection.
«You know, I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it.
And here I was challenged, because how do you write about doctrine and how the Scriptures impact people's lives without sounding like a cheap tract?
No doubt there is some justification for their belief that the lessening of knowledge and conviction about these doctrines has left a void that leads to lack of evangelical fervor in the church as a whole.
When Francis talks about doctrine becoming «clearly contrary» to a «new understanding of Christian truth,» it seems that he rejects Newman's notion that a development of doctrine is conservative of the doctrine's past.
In my theology class at Fuller Theological Seminary, I teach my students about the doctrine of Providence.
The Methodists took constant criticism from people who believed false reports about their doctrines and practices.
Quakers don't worry about doctrines, but instead welcome anyone who wishes to engage in the practices of worship and community with us.
If disagreements about doctrine do not strike at the heart of Christianity, then mutual tolerance is called for.
This issue is more directly about the doctrine of God than strictly Christology, but it deeply affects Christology as well.
It is a professional hazard for a theologian to write extensively about the doctrine of God.
I don't know much about Lutherans, but I've never pictured them as passionate about doctrine.
Their was no separation about doctrine, or denomination, what you wore, who you hung with, what you ate, none of that... Just brothers and sisters with LIFE!
Paul is clear that there are some disagreements, even about doctrine, that shouldn't divide.
Perry may haste from one church to another, but he will not escape the confusion about the doctrine of baptism in the US churches.
@Theo We've had the discussion before about the doctrine of «cognite intrare».
Seriously, look at the baloney they're spewing about their doctrine denying the priesthood to blacks for over a century.
What I find amusing about people fighting tooth and nail about the Bible being the only source of inspired truth, is the fact that they themselves are defending a harmful fallacy about the doctrines of pre-believers being doomed to eternal separation from God.
Some of the fights within modern Protestantism about doctrine suggest that it is desperately important that, «We get this right!»
In what follows I will show that the first assumption is clearly wrong and that the second assumption glosses over certain important distinctions Whitehead made about his doctrine of ingression.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z