Sentences with phrase «about earlier i understand»

As Jill M. posted about earlier I understand her loss and I know what it means to not know an entire portion of ones family.

As Jill M. posted about earlier I understand her loss and I know what it means to not know an entire portion of ones family.

Not exact matches

Though Oracle's critics have complained over the years about Ellison's tendency to promise a product prematurely, or sacrifice quality for early delivery, he clearly understands the benefit of first - mover advantage.

«It's about winning favor early in the transaction and understanding the thing that drives them; giving them the feeling that they just got a bit more than they were expecting.»

In fact, it's all about understanding the differences between early adopters and mainstream customers, and managing your own marketing and development efforts to cross this deadly chasm.

He knew very little about digital media in those early days, relying entirely on his understanding of Facebook (fb) instead.

Investors have had time to understand Michael Dell's turnaround plan, but Dell's shares traded at no more than about $ 11 apiece in the months before buyout rumors surfaced in early January.

They discovered and refined potent themes about keeping out immigrants, «draining the swamp» and restoring an earlier era of national greatness — as understood mainly to mean for white American men.

I think Christians, in general, don't know jack squat about the gay lifestyle / community nor do they really take the time to understand... their scripture says this and that's all they need (blatant ignorance — but that's life)... even those scriptures are up for contention as noted earlier by Trey.

To be clear, you explained why this happens (although I dispute your comments about females becoming «ripe» — «But understand that females at hotter areas become ripe at earlier age and if body was built well enough and had her monthly period coming early age than she is ready minimum 9 years old...»), but I'm more interested in whether or not it is accepted legally, morally or according to islam.

Even now you talk down to me (about me) as if you understand my journey in its early stages so full of a lack of enlightenment.

It also places it in continuity with the experiences of the early church, and within the continuing narrative of the development of Christian thought — as people have struggled to make sense of and articulate their lived experience of God — which produced the great ecumenical creeds (with their clear progression of understanding about God, Christ and the Holy Spirit)- and which continues on today.

What is more important, the earlier critics did less than justice to the fact that the Bible has its own doctrine about the nature of history, which deserves to be understood and appreciated in itself.

In the early days of the church, belief in the ascension had political consequences, since the ascension was understood to be about the power of Jesus.

As he wrote earlier in this chapter, any use of the test as «a substitute for searching conversation» about world view / setting and the other dimensions of narrative explored later in the book was in his view more likely to yield a mechanist reduction than a deepened symbolic understanding.

Some additional readings and understanding about basic fallacies might also help you to see that your religious beliefs aren't any different from earlier supersti - tions and god stories that humans have invented in their history.

Before we come to an exposition of what early Protestants were trying to say positively with their new image, it is important to understand precisely what struck them as negative about the image of the Middle Ages.

An earlier version of this book was of immense help to me as I learned about the roles of faith and works in the life of the believer, and how to understand most of the tough texts in the Bible on this topic.

We are not at all prejudging anything about chronology, that is, about establishing the dates of the teachers and writings of the Mahayana schools — their roots are in the earliest times; rather we are trying to give the psychological and objective points of departure in which the speculations of the later schools were grounded and out of which they are therefore to be understood.

It was appropriate, then, for early 20th - century Social Gospel theologians like Walter Rauschenbusch to observe how prejudice and social discrimination are passed from one generation to the next, and it is consistent for theologians today to incorporate observations about social inheritance — what liberation theologians and feminist theologians call «social location» or «systemic evil» — into our understanding of the human condition.

One of the striking things about the Easter and post-Easter narratives in the New Testament is that they are largely about incomprehension: which is to say that, in the canonical Gospels, the early Church admitted that it took some time for the first Christian believers to understand what had happened in the Resurrection, and how what had happened changed everything.

We are now in position to see more clearly how Paul understood the necessity of the incarnation, (This term can scarcely be avoided, but will be understood, when applied to Paul, in the light of what I tried to say earlier), about which we were speaking in the preceding lecture.

No question about Jesus can be asked with less likelihood of an assured answer, but the question must be asked nevertheless if we would approach an understanding of the meaning of Jesus in the early church.

Applied to the Whiteheadian notion of a society, this understanding of Spirit illuminates what I said earlier about a society vis - à - vis its member actual entities.

Second, while the debate may seem to be about the relevance of archaeology for understanding ancient Israel's origins and early history the divisive issue is not the relevance of archaeology but the way archaeological evidence is interpreted.

Since His love - in - operation is His essential nature — He is love, which is His «root - attribute», not aseity, as the older theology claimed — the other things said about Him (transcendence, immanence, omnipotence, omniscience, omni - presence, righteousness, etc.) are to be understood, as I have already argued earlier, as adverbially descriptive of His mode of being love rather than set up as separate or even as distinct attributions.

In an earlier article I noted that in India, any discussion about baptism and conversion takes on «added significance because of the understanding that after baptism the «converted» person has not only changed his or her religion but also social milieu, habits, customs, and manners, in addition to forfeiting several legal rights, especially with regard to the inheritance of property.

The New Testament is part of that tradition, not separated from it; therefore, its significance is in reporting the earliest ways, so far as we can recover them, in which Jesus was understood by men and women who themselves were caught up in that tradition and who found (as Houlden notes) «an experience of salvation, of new well - being in relation to God» in their response to the event about which the witness spoke (p. 135).

They were attracted to what they saw of the faith and practices of early Christian communities; only later did they come to understand very much about the faith, after a prolonged program of catechesis made them proficient in an alien grammar and way of life.

I think Creel is correct in claiming that on Hartshorne's view God learns about possibilities as time goes on; indeed, earlier portions of this paper imply that this is a consequence of any view which understands possibilities as a continuum.

All the great spiritual writers have known this, but few in the Church's history understood it better, experienced it more deeply, and wrote about it with more insight than John Cassian, the monk from southern Gaul who lived in the early part of the fifth century.

In Jesus time when he fled Herod with his parents, the largest group of Jews where he possibly fled to, were located in Alexandria, a place where 300 years earlier Alexander, who conquered as far as India and tried to have his subjects learn about and understand each other... had followers that built the great library of Alexandria, holding much of the knowledge of the ancient world.

I have already listed several of these quotes in an earlier post about how Calvinists understand the phrase «dead in sin,» so let me provide just a few additional quotations here which are fairly typical of how Ephesians 2:1 - 3 is understood.

As we saw above, the Christian tradition understood it as a reference to the parousia (Luke), or to the burial and resurrection of Jesus (Matthew), but these interpretations come from the world of ideas to be found in early Christianity and say nothing about ancient Judaism.

Early Christian thinkers knew, writes Wilken, «something that has largely been forgotten by biblical scholars, and their commentaries are an untapped resource for understanding the Bible as a book about Christ.»

In so far as the early Christian gospel was addressed to Jews and / or gentiles of the first century, it can certainly be understood in a more specific way if we know something about the first - century world; on the other hand, it may be that we shall be tempted to make what was intended generally more specific than it actually was when we relate it too closely to the first century.

Did you understand from the beginning you were likely to offend folks with your unhealthy yet indulgent food served by extra-attractive human specimens, and decide early not to worry about it because your core audience would get it?

I understand what you are saying about it being too early but these were just my initial thoughts

Earlier reports suggested that the Spanish club were ready to sell the defender in order to balance the books though, and if they were about to do this then I could understand them not wanting to risk the deal by playing him in a pointless match.

Then he thinks because his earlier success increased the share price then Fans should be proud of it... He does not understand the fact that we as fans don't give a damn about those numbers.

There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)

maybe you don't understand that Wenger's words are simply an attempt to recover some of the market value that was lost due to the way they have mishandled his contract negotiations, which means that everyone, once again, knows that we have little to no leverage when it comes to negotiating a transfer... much like we did with RVP, when we sold the EPL trophy to ManU for less than $ 25 million... any reputable team with a sporting director would never have allowed this situation to occur again and if they had heads would roll... if handled correctly the worst case scenario would have seen us get a minimum of $ 65 million for a player of his ilk in the present economic climate and we could have used those funds to purchase the best available striker in the early days of the transfer window... just imagine what outsiders must think about the state of our team if all you did was read the headlines... sadly, things might just might be worse than they think

This is why this early in the process before combines and pro-days and before we learn what teams really think about players, I want to highlight the most overlooked understood thing in the draft: being drafted into the right atmosphere.

It may seem to early to think about kids when you'd rather think about picking out a dress and the perfect wedding venue, but if you're planning to have children, it's essential to understand your family - of - origin issues.

Obviously talking to your toddler about sexually explicit scenarios and situations wouldn't be appropriate (or particularly helpful, since they really won't understand what you're talking about), but laying down the groundwork with concepts of bodily autonomy and empowering them to speak up when they are hurt or uncomfortable can start as early as two years old.

Conversations about feelings should happen as early as possible, so that your child understands that different emotions cause different behaviors.

A bit of education in advance of your «on the job training» will enable you to better understand what to expect about breastfeeding / chestfeeding and your baby's behavior in the early days.

Parents learn to understand what their babies / children are communicating with body language, symbolic play, behaviors and words about their earliest experiences; families learn ways of interacting and activities that will lead to resolution of early trauma and closer, more loving family bonds.

While some people may get excited at hearing their baby say a word in the early months, there is some debate about if a baby's first word is actually referencing something and they understand what they are saying, or if the baby is simply just babbling.

Talking about financial needs and goals early on enables the person with Alzheimer's disease to understand the issues, clarify his or her wishes and participate in making financial and care plans.