Just when the culture starts asking questions
about economic equality and issues of international justice for the poor, the church also starts teaching and writing about similar issues.
Not exact matches
We can't become «all
about»
economic equality but we can care more
about the lives of the people around us and reclaim the value Jesus placed on feeding, clothing, visiting and inviting in.
Today these various concerns
about culture, socio -
economic justice, true
equality for women, institutions, and the natural world are in some tension with one another.
Grantly Dick - Read, the father of the natural childbirth philosophy, was a eugenicist who was quite honest
about his goal of convincing women of the «better classes» to have more children and give up those pesky demands for political and
economic equality.
The dialogue that ensued engaged the authors with a series of questions surrounding the book's central thesis: despite the real progress in racial
equality achieved by the 1960s civil rights legislation, the United States political institution has been caught in between two modes of conceptualizing, and enacting policy,
about race — both of which have failed to close the tremendous gap in racial disparities in social and
economic welfare that are a legacy of American history.
It is questionable whether it makes sense, in the 21st century, to reflect
about questions of social justice, liberty,
equality or other core concepts of political theory without taking
economic issues into account.
«Piece together the different statements from Mr Farage and his gang and think
about what it says: «working mothers aren't worth as much as men; life was better when there wasn't
equality for gay and lesbian people; you feel safer when you don't have someone who is foreign living next door; the NHS should be privatised; rights at work, whether they come from Europe or from here, are simply a barrier to
economic success.
Chattel slavery, child labor,
economic inequality, racism, sexism and discriminations of all types abounded until the liberal tradition of fairness, justice, care and
equality brought
about a free and fair society.
If a country finds a way to meet the basic needs of women by taking loans that the whole society must pay, but the national constitution, and the various policies and services do not show the timely commitment for equity and
equality, the chance to eradicate poverty and hunger will only be
about the alleviation of these two major indicators of real development and sustainability It is then urgent and important not to fall in such a trap, which only comes to add to the financial and
economic indebtedness of the society, and nations, to say the least, and to maintain the system of inequality and impoverishment as it basically exist..
Put simply, contrary to the arguments of many White Democrats (as well as pundits such as Jonathan Chait of New York, Frank Bruni of the New York Times and academic Mark Lilla), focusing on the efforts of Black, Latino, immigrant, and low - income communities for
economic, social and political
equality (which has often been derisively called «identity politics»), is critical to Democrat success in winning elections as well as in winning support from younger voters who are also concerned
about these matters.
Black History Month provides a wonderful opportunity for educators to teach their students
about the pivotal role black Americans have played in U.S. history, and to help students recognize the importance of social, political, and
economic equality as it applies to race.
When I served as student body president at AU and began working on the issues I had always cared
about — gender equity, racial justice, opportunity regardless of
economic background, and, yes, LGBTQ
equality — it became clear that making a difference in the world wouldn't diminish or dilute my own pain and incompleteness.
And Sayn - Wittgenstein was less
about the recognition of an Austrian constitutional idiosyncrasy than
about the
economic rationality of
equality.
While feminists worked to enact laws that would help women retain their share of some of the
economic security they had «in partnership» helped accumulate, along came joint custody theory and joint custody laws — once again, using feminists» own words
about equality against them, and in a weird way, rendering children yet another possession for equitable division.