Recent posts include discussions
about electronic evidence in divorce, same sex marriage and QDROs.
When you begin working with a client on a new litigation matter, you'll know something about the facts of the case, but next to nothing
about the electronic evidence in your client's custody.
Not exact matches
«This paper adds to the rapidly growing body of
evidence raising concerns
about the aggressive marketing of
electronic cigarettes in those countries where it is still permitted.
What the Crown and the court were talking
about was the series of provisions on
electronic evidence from s. 31.1 to s. 31.8 of the Act.
This article is
about the poorly drafted proposed 2nd edition of a National Standard of Canada, which the
Evidence Acts make necessary for discovery and admissibility proceedings concerning the use of electronic records as e
Evidence Acts make necessary for discovery and admissibility proceedings concerning the use of
electronic records as
evidenceevidence.
The problem is compounded in the UK by the absence of detailed guidance in the Civil Procedure Rules
about how to deal with
electronic evidence.
``... When you think
about it, even a crime scene photograph is
electronic evidence now.»
The best
evidence, however, is an April 2, 1994, news article in The Baltimore Sun, Lawyers in Cyberspace,
about how Venable «recently hung out an
electronic shingle as a publisher on the Internet — making articles by its lawyers available worldwide to users of the far - flung network of computer networks.»
I recognize there is still some outmoded thinking
about e-signatures (as if faxes weren't essentially
electronic documents themselves, except easier to fake than PDFs), but for general legal communications, where is the
evidence?
For example, it is up to judges to determine whether digital
evidence is reasonably accessible, or even to determine what
electronic evidence is — something not always clear when talking
about spreadsheets, databases or other unstructured data.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (b)(2) mandates that lawyers meet and confer
about discovery issues and agree on how to handle
electronic evidence.
This appeal requires an examination of the effect of
electronic record management on the laws of
evidence, which were formulated on different assumptions
about how records are kept.
You may not use these
electronic means to investigate or communicate
about the case because it is important that you decide this case based solely on the
evidence presented in this courtroom.
(By contrast the statute and regulations
about Canada's secure
electronic signatures give a presumption of attribution and of admissibility as
evidence to the signed document.)
Craig Ball is a Board Certified trial lawyer, certified computer forensic examiner and
electronic evidence expert He has dedicated his career to teaching the bench and bar
about forensic technology and trial tactics.
As Canada's only independent law firm devoted exclusively to eDiscovery and
electronic evidence management, Heuristica is frequently asked to speak or present at association meetings or to litigation teams
about eDiscovery.
No lawyer with half a brain plugs
electronic evidence into his or her own computer and pokes around because, by now, most lawyers know
about metadata, and appreciate that they can alter
evidence simply by browsing it.
The Austin, Texas - based attorney, professor and
electronic evidence expert has always been passionate
about technology — somewhat too passionate at times.
In this episode of The Florida Bar Podcast from the 2017 Annual Florida Bar Convention, hosts Christine Bilbrey and Jonathon Israel talk to Suzanne Clark and Park McManis
about electronic discovery and digital
evidence.
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY Looking for an Epidemiologist position with Lab Services: • Five years of clinical experience of coordinating and implementing activities related to building the practice and
evidence - base of health equity • Highly skilled in conducting analysis of performance monitoring data to bring
about comprehension of equity impact • Hands on experience in designing and developing data collection instruments and systems related to diseases on case - based surveillance • Proven experience of assisting in planning implementing
electronic lab reporting
About Blog Ride the Lightning:
Electronic Evidence is a blog by Sharon D. Nelson, a noted author and lecturer and President of the digital forensics firm Sensei Enterprises, Inc..
About Blog Craig Ball of Austin is a trial lawyer, computer forensic examiner, law professor and noted authority on
electronic evidence.
Griffin v. State, 19 A. 3d 415, 421 - 22 (Md.) Generally, a witness authenticating
electronic evidence must «provide factual specificity
about the process by which the electronically stored information is created, acquired, maintained, and preserved without alteration or change, or the process by which it is produced if the result of a system or process that does so.»
Some judges are skeptical
about what process was used to acquire the texts and some states only accept
electronic evidence if it has been obtained by a professional such as a private investigator.