Judith raises concerns
about the epistemology of models for open, complex systems, distinctly indefinite... and then... adopting an uncertain global climate policy that could possibly produce «losses that throw mankind into economic, social and environmental bankruptcy.»
We've been asleep at the wheel, haven't carefully thought about the epistemology of consensus, and what should count as evidence.
• Lack of formal model verification & validation, which is the norm for engineering and regulatory science • Circularity in arguments validating climate models against observations, owing to tuning & prescribed boundary conditions • Concerns about fundamental lack of predictability in a complex nonlinear system characterized by spatio - temporal chaos with changing boundary conditions • Concerns
about the epistemology of models of open, complex systems
I got PhD at Penn State University but I had to school myself on Philosophy of Science, learning deeply
about Epistemology, Metaphysics, Logics, and History of Science.
, there were interesting questions being raised
about epistemology / hermenuetic.
R In 1879, W. K. Clifford had never thought
about epistemology and had not acquired the concept of rational justification, so that he didn't believe that he was rationally justified in believing that ship owners ought not to send their ships to sea without checking their seaworthiness.
How could he have done that, if he had never thought
about epistemology and hadn't so much as acquired the concept of rational justifiability?
Now suppose your student responds as follows: «Look,» he says, «by 1879 Clifford had been lecturing and writing
about epistemology for years.
It's fundamentally
about epistemology.
Not exact matches
He's a Thomist in terms of «
epistemology,» which means that he believes that we're, by nature, all
about both economic liberty and the truth
about the personal, relational God.
If you really don't care
about evidence, if you just wanted us to provide an answer without any interest in what we'd say, or without any care to understand our position... then I guess yeah, there's no way for me to show your beliefs to be flawed, as you've adopted a purely egocentric
epistemology.
If an
epistemology of the cross were
about no other task, its contribution to the critique of power - as - domination would justify its existence.
An
epistemology oriented by the cross shares feminists» skepticism
about traditional science «s claims
about objectivity.
Just a word
about the relation between Luther's theology of the cross and the contemporary proposal that lam calling an «
epistemology of the cross.»
To examine what an
epistemology of the cross has to say
about power is principally to underscore the critical element at its center.
Developments in quantum mechanics (with its emphasis on probabilities, wave - particle duality, quantum teleportation of information and tunnelling, and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle) may prove a useful, if limited, tool in speculating
about topics such as free will, communication, matter - spirit and
epistemology.
The investigation of the relationship between fat and perception is not a matter, I suppose, that formal
epistemology concerns itself with; but in its words
about the knowledge of God the biblical account is steeped in it.
Recognizing these assumptions
about theology and
epistemology helps to explain why Protestants in the United States keep repeating traditional ways of thinking
about «truth.»
But this is very different from supposing that we must begin with modern
epistemology and only raise questions
about the reality of the world after we have explained epistemologically how those questions can be answered.
According to the intention of its founder, genetic
epistemology should examine how scientific thinking, as it pertains to the established sciences, becomes possible in the development of the individual from child to adult; genetic
epistemology should further ask
about the relationships between this ontogenetic process and the phylogenetic process of the history of humankind as the history of science.
I entered into the earlier long discussion on ontology and
epistemology in preparation for submitting and testing the following assumption: Let us assume that the way we come to faith in God and come to develop symbolic expressions
about relationship to Him is not fundamentally different from the way we come to have certitude
about and develop symbolic specificity
about our other relations.
And in a spirit of honesty Klemke gives us the
epistemology (that is, the view of what constitutes true knowledge) which undergirds his skepticism
about meaning in the universe:
Consequently his
epistemology avoids the pitfalls of nineteenth century Traditionalism which, carried to its logical conclusion, by undermining the possibility of any rational discourse
about reality - and God as its ultimate cause - leads either to radical scepticism or fideism.
New York, NY
About Blog Philosophy of mind,
epistemology and cognitive science.
Spartanburg, SC
About Blog This site collects resources from the pens of John Frame and Vern Poythress, two Reformed theologians who have made contributions to the body of Christ in systematics,
epistemology, linguistics, sociology, and other fields.
Here I would agree with Stephen Downes when he says that its not the content that matters but the process in which the MOOC is taken which would bring
about a change in the
epistemology.
A: Solid content knowledge, strong knowledge
about pedagogical techniques in mathematics, a deep understanding of the
epistemology of mathematics, knowledge
about how people learn math, and the ability to listen to and engage the learner.
Esthetics, ontology, and
epistemology — questions
about art, being, and what one knows or can know — became shorthand for an artist's acts of creation, vision, and perception.
The philosophical proposals of new materialism probe the limits of historical theories attached to Enlightenment ontology (what is in the world) and
epistemology (what we know
about what is in the world, and how it is classified), wherein things were considered to be separate and unable to affect one another.
If anyone is interested in a highly amateur take on what's important
about how we know we don't know, with some
epistemology thrown in, Tobis has kindly given me a platform to invite thinkers
about thought to talk
about communication in the context of what is not knowledge:
The history of the word «trivial» tells us a lot
about why
epistemology has become dysfunctional and modern science needs re-educating in logic.
Namely, I'd expect you to alert * me * to the errors * you * can see in * my *
epistemology (or whatever - ology we're talking
about).
WRT to your statement
about personal = > Was Aristotle's metaphysics and
epistemology his personal finding?
Because climate is a complex system with many feedbacks, how we assess our knowledge
about complex systems is a fairly new topic in
epistemology and the philosophy of science.
I agree with most of what she says
about the growth of scientific knowledge and, as far as I can tell as an amateur, her views are broadly consistent with current
epistemology.
Many months ago I got in a tiny snit
about the polysyllabic word
epistemology.
New York, NY
About Blog Philosophy of mind,
epistemology and cognitive science.
Spartanburg, SC
About Blog This site collects resources from the pens of John Frame and Vern Poythress, two Reformed theologians who have made contributions to the body of Christ in systematics,
epistemology, linguistics, sociology, and other fields.
Netherlands
About Blog Blogs are on the philosophy of the social sciences,
epistemology and methodology, hermeneutics and analytical philosophy.
Spartanburg, SC
About Blog This site collects resources from the pens of John Frame and Vern Poythress, two Reformed theologians who have made contributions to the body of Christ in systematics,
epistemology, linguistics, sociology, and other fields.
Through course readings, discussion, and practical application, candidates explore: (1) different approaches in qualitative research and
epistemologies and common theoretical perspectives that undergird qualitative inquiry, and (2) various methods and techniques for gathering, interpreting, and making meaning of in - depth and rich information
about things as they occur in their natural settings.