Not exact matches
There are other open questions
about how the RTA is affected by the different protection orders, particularly when the perpetrator was a tenant or co-tenant of the residential premises at the time a protection order was made that granted the victim
exclusive possession of those premises.
Both the Family Law Act and the Matrimonial Property Act are silent
about the status of a perpetrator who was a tenant or co-tenant at the time an order granting
exclusive possession to the victim was made, so it is likely the perpetrator will continue to be a tenant.
The expression of these rights and interests in these terms [the right to
exclusive possession occupation use and enjoyment of the land] reflects not only the content of a right to be asked permission
about how and by whom country may be used, but also the common law's concern to identify property relationships between people or things as rights of control over access to, and exploitation of, the place or thing.