What are we
doing about failing schools, how do we pay teachers and what we are paying for are questions that are implicitly raised in every budget.
Even if states could get away with making cosmetic changes under these programs, their combined impact helped to build demand in state capitols to do something
serious about failing schools — and supplied resources that states could leverage toward this end.
Still, if reformers want the federal government to do
something about failing schools, they should team up with the good folks at the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools and push for dramatically higher federal funding for charter schools, as well as smart policies to encourage the rapid replication of quality schools.
«It's incredibly important that as the city weighs a number of important decisions over the next weeks and
months about failing schools that parents» voices are heard today,» Jeremiah Kittredge, the executive director of F.E.S., said during a press conference following the rally.
Pardon my skepticism, but it feels like we have been here before with earlier programs designed to address
concerns about failing schools, like A Nation at Risk and No Child Left Behind.
His leadership style brings me back to a
quote about failing schools and school turnaround from former Interim APS Superintendent, Errol Davis:
On the school's web site, though, someone was apparently desperate to find something
positive about the failing school, noting that it's «the only Garden School in Los Angeles» and «we pride ourselves in taking the classroom outside, not limiting our students within the confines of a traditional classroom.»
Created in the Race - to - the - Top - application era to convince federal proposal - scorers that Tennessee was
serious about its failing schools, the ASD was charged with, well, doing exactly that.
As for state control, statistical modeling shows that having a child in public school and saying that extracurriculars and advanced academics are important aspects of school quality are all negatively associated with preferring that the state education agency make
decisions about failing schools.
THE BIPARTISAN bill crafted by House and Senate lawmakers to replace No Child Left Behind leaves it to the states to decide what to
do about failing schools.