When asked why I changed my mind
about federal climate policy, this is a large part of my answer.
Not exact matches
Respondents were asked
about their views on
climate change, support for specific
policies under consideration in the
federal / provincial / territorial
climate action negotiations underway in Fall 2016, and the
federal government's role in implementing a national
climate plan.
He comes to the table with strong feelings
about keeping
federal lands in the hands of the government, a belief that «something is going on» with the
climate and an embrace of an «all of the above» energy
policy.
His rich descriptions and lively anecdotes provide pointed lessons
about the partisan
climate that stymies much
federal policy making today.
They do not meet the standard of timing, but that is because the pace of temperature change depends on development, growth, and
policy decisions
about climate and other things that can not be predicted (but that does not stop the
Federal Reserve from setting monetary
policy).
In recent years, concerns
about the effects those emissions might have on the
climate have prompted the Congress,
federal regulators, and others to consider
policies to reduce them.
Automakers are telling consumers that they care
about climate change but are spreading
climate denial behind the scenes to influence
federal policy.
In April 2011, not long after Julia Gillard was returned to power in the 2010
federal election, I asked a representative sample of Australians
about their attitudes to
climate policy.
Local government as a way of getting
climate emergency action through Photos by Julian Meehan, audio recordings by The Sustainable Hour Philip Sutton Trent McCarthy Mik Aidt Bryony Edwards Adrian Whitehead How councils can reverse global warming With State and
Federal Governments failing to implement
policies to reestablish a safe
climate, this workshop at Read more
about Exploring the critical role local councils can play in reversing global warming -LSB-...]
United States president Donald Trump's assault on
federal climate policy only got more people thinking and talking
about climate change.
A review by the Center for
Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) of five detailed studies published recently by various NGOs and
federal energy forecasters (M.J. Bradley, the Energy Information Administration, the Bipartisan
Policy Center, the Rhodium Group for the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and the Nicholas Institute) finds that the CPP will only require
about an 18 percent emissions reduction beyond business - as - usual scenarios from now through 2030.
Denialists will want to focus on the anomalously cool region of northern Russia — not record - breaking, but taking
about anomalous cooling can help to introduce doubt into the decision - making process, which is helpful when it comes to blocking
climate and energy legislation, preventing
federal and state shifts in energy
policy, providing talking points for Inhofe & Barton, etc..