Sentences with phrase «about force +»

So the revised calculations make me feel much better about force + night for the night weapons.

Not exact matches

Schmelzer loves to talk about how mentors at the Nike + Accelerator forced him and his partners to overhaul their GeoPalz business plan to focus on the lifetime value of their child customers.

Wenger has always forced players to try new positions and when they shine, it's all down to Wenger's amazing coaching, for example Thierry Henry, Emmanuel Petit, Lauren, Alex Song, Ljungberg, Van Persie and a couple of others at most... but it's kept quiet about the 100 + players he failed to make shine in a new position.

As I understand Hansen he's saying: if we double CO2 this century (so upto about 550 - 600 ppm), that will mean a forcing of about 4 W / m2 and 3 degrees C warming in the short term (decades), and thru slow feedbacks (albedo + GHG) another 4 W / m2 and 3 degrees in the long term (centuries / millennia).

The Martian: Extended Edition (Blu - ray + Digital HD) Release date: June 7 Details: 2015, Fox Home Entertainment Rated: Unrated & PG - 13, language, brief nudity, injury images The lowdown: Director Ridley Scott adds 10 minutes to this very entertaining movie about an American astronaut stranded on the Red Planet after a storm forces his crew mates to abandon the planet without him.

ABOUT: Mario + Rabbids Kingdom Battle is the story of an unexpected encounter between the most famous video game character, Mario, and the irreverent and chaotic Rabbids as they join forces to restore the Mushroom Kingdom, which has been torn apart by a mysterious vortex.

The + R Driving mode adjusts the throttle, suspension, and steering for a more thrilling driving experience, and the digital meter display on the dashboard gives you information about boost pressure, g - forces, and track times.

ABOUT: Mario + Rabbids Kingdom Battle is the story of an unexpected encounter between the most famous video game character, Mario, and the irreverent and chaotic Rabbids as they join forces to restore the Mushroom Kingdom, which has been torn apart by a mysterious vortex.

But in any case, do an expansion about today (t1) and you will see that the forcing increase is linear in time i.e. F ~ F (t1) + k * (t - t1) * B * exp (k * t1) / C (t1)(minor correction made)-- gavin]

A doubling of CO2 in present conditions would add a forcing of about 3.7 W / m2 (+ / -?

And what about the problem that the forcing due to solar variation is only like + / -0.2 W / m ^ 2, not enough to explain the observed temperature variations?

If you pick a modern ear baseline where you have more data and a better handle on forcings you end up with about 0.8 C — 2.0 C «sensitivity» and an uncertainty range of about + / -0.3 C degrees.

Maybe you don't know much about the sum of radiative forcings, or findings from paleoclimate, that allow climatologists to calculate that human emissions of greenhouse gases are responsible for 100 + % of recent warming, but that doesn't mean nobody does.

Natural oscillations (mainly solar) and variable non-CO2 forcing like aerosols have caused fluctuations up to + / -0.1 C about that trends so no one expects it to follow the CO2 curve more closely than to within about a tenth of a degree, but the overall rise remains 1 C (+ / -0.1 C) and the overall CO2 forcing of 2 W / m2 is consistent with that.

Based on CERES - EBAF data calibrated to Argo OHC up to July the 2008 - 2017 average TOA imbalance is going to be about 0.9 W / m2, Berkeley Earth Land + Ocean global average about 1.01 K difference from 1860 - 1879, forcing updated using NOAA AGGI to about 2.3 W / m2.

The 5AR estimates (with «low confidence») they create -1 W / m2 of forcing, with an uncertainty of about + / - 1 W / m2, with GHGs forcing of about 3.2 + / - 1 W / m2 (5AR WG1 Figure T. 6).

This emissivity is what determines CO2 sensitivity (forcing for a doubling of CO2) and the IPCC is still looking for a way to narrow the range of sensitivities which has not improved since the sleight of hand of the Charney report 4 decades ago (3 °C + - 1.5 °C, talk about the «settled science»!).

If r is the total radius of the wood being sampled, w the width of an annual ring, and h is the height, then the volume added is Pi * -LSB-(r + w) ^ 2 - r ^ 2] * h or, neglecting the w ^ 2 term, about 2 * Pi * r * w * h. Under circumstance where the total VOLUME of annual growth is constant, the width of tree rings is forced to decrease exponentially with age; a constraint that may explain the presence of the negative exponential term in the RCS formula.

So how can we possibly start talking about anthropogenic forcings and surface temperature changes wrought by same when we don't even know to + -5 C what the average temperature of the earth should be due to our albedo measurements being so imprecise and having no bloody idea how, when, and why the earth's average albedo varies.

As I understand Hansen he's saying: if we double CO2 this century (so upto about 550 - 600 ppm), that will mean a forcing of about 4 W / m2 and 3 degrees C warming in the short term (decades), and thru slow feedbacks (albedo + GHG) another 4 W / m2 and 3 degrees in the long term (centuries / millennia).

No feedback CO2 sensitivity is about 1.21 + / - 0.25, water vapor feedback is about 2x (nfbCo2) + / -1, and water vapor is dependent on surface temperatures not CO2 only, so any «natural» or «unforced» variability should have the same amplification as CO2e «forcing».

Over at RealClimate, David B Benson sees AMO + Volcanic forcing as significant, and I'll give you a link after a comment I'm about to do there.

I have been arguing for years that all of these standard form contracts that are being forced upon us in the 21st century — are about as far from being «offer + acceptance + consideration» as one can get!

On John's larger point about using grades because they're a «safe» measure, I'd simply remind everyone that there were bad old days, when applicants to firms were judged on factors that were less than meritorious, and so if grades, dumb as they are, do nothing else they force a law firm to swallow hard before declining to hire a Black woman with a fist full of A + marks.

About Type: Public Limited Company Subsidiary of: Legal & General Founded: 1836 - Legal & General Underwritten by: Banner Life Insurance Company Website: lgamerica.com Phone: [phone] Address: 3275 Bennett Creek Avenue, Maryland, 21704 A.M Best Rating: A + (Superior) 2nd highest of 16 possible ratings Comdex Ranking: 94 out of 100 Insurance In - Force: $ 658 Billion Assets: $ 7.3 Billion Customers - Over one million U.S. customers and ten million worldwide, 5th largest issuer of new life insurance in America Competition: New York Life, Northwestern Mutual, Mass Mutual, MetLife, John Hancock, Principal, State Farm, Allstate, AIG, Mutual of Omaha, Ohio National Life, SBLI, Protective Life, Primerica, State Farm, USAA, Pacific Life Insurance, North American Co, Lincoln National Life, AAA, Transamerica, Prudential.