Sentences with phrase «about formations as»

It is possible for people to become anally retentive about formations as in a good team players should be fluid in reacting to changed situations.

Not exact matches

Remember, if you're ever unsure about compliance guidelines, formation structure, business expansion and beyond, it is always a good idea to consult with trusted advisors, such as your lawyer or CPA, and expert resources to guide in your decision making process.

Such adoptees do about as well on a wide range of indicators of self - esteem and ethnic identity formation as their non-adopted siblings.

As communications director for the Network for Teaching Entrepreneurship, I frequently write and talk about business formation and creation.

The pace of oil and gas production gains has consistently surprised forecasters since horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, better known as «fracking», were pioneered in U.S. shale rock formations about ten years ago.

As a matter of curiosity, what do you think about technical analysis and candlestick formations?

Collectively, although nascent, we are at a key milestone in the formation of a new dynamic industry and an emerging asset class that is in many ways is equally about human capital as much as it is financial capital.»

For example, North Dakota's Bakken + Three Forks formations are estimated (as of 2013, USGS) to have a mean of 7.4 billion recoverable barrels, making total oil in those formations only about a year's worth of U.S. dependence.

At least for the Dow, this is just about as textbook a broadening top formation as one is likely to see in terms of long term price.

The pillars of one's DNA, the spirals of all celestial life forms and formations cellularized containments is where God's Sons and their given wives are taken in as residents there abouts.

For the first time since becoming a mother, I was thinking less about how I didn't want to parent and more about how I did want to parent, particularly as it concerned my child's spiritual formation.

For as well as theoretical reflection on the moral significance of a decision, there are other ways and means by which a human being can either become clear about the rightness and conformity to God's will of a decision, or at least improve the conditions for its correct formation: the general cultivation of courage, unselfishness, self - denial, the practice of the art of making vital particular decisions which can not be deduced by purely theoretical consideration as this art is taught by the masters of the spiritual life.

Discipleship is not so much about radical commitment as it is about radical love, and the disciplines are not so much about spiritual formation as about love formation.

Everyone must somehow put together his convictions about such matters as knowledge, the mass media, art, manners, work, play, nature, health, sex, class, race, economics, politics, international relations, and religion into a pattern for the formation of character through the curriculum.

The obligation to bear and communicate such meanings against his natural feeling and thinking was the ground of Jeremiah's discovery of his selfhood as «I.» Not the reception of the Word as such but the necessity to decide about it was crucial to the formation of this structure of existence and to its preservation and strengthening in the Jewish community.

As Eric Hester explains later in this issue The Truth and Meaning of Human Sexuality [11] teaches that formation in chastity and any information imparted about sexuality should be given in the broadest context of information about love.

The Faith Alive group in Southampton has in the past decade initiated Alpha courses, an ecumenical programme sharing ideas about leadership, formation and outreach methods with other denominations, a city guildhall event with a Catholic inspirational speaker and prayer teams, a city mission, an introductory programme for «new seekers», that is people interested in the Church and who might wish to continue with the RCIA, displays outside a church on a main road and a manned gazebo to provide information and resources to passers - by during the papal visit, and the Anchor catecheticscourse making use of the «way of beauty» for evangelising parishioners, seen as a primary target.

Also see Stanley Hauerwas, «The Family as a School for Character,» Religious Education 80 (Spring 1985): 272 - 85, for a similar analysis of the way this reasoning about the family in character formation «can too easily turn the family into an idolatrous institution.»

But there's something deeply disconcerting about seeing an exhibit on, for example, «A Biblical Model of Coal Formation» or «Biblical Model of Tectonic Plate Activity» or whatever and seeing them labeled as «God's Word.»

Thus the function which the tradition about Jesus performed in the life and worship of the Church came to be recognized as the organizing principle in the formation of the individual stories and sayings, and in the formation of the Gospels themselves.

Biologists do not agree about the mechanism of the continual disappearance of phyla in the course of geological time, a process almost as mysterious as that of their formation; but the reality of the phenomenon is indisputable.

As time did force the celestial nebulas to progressively surround the gravimetric oscillations where from did come about galactic formations of the elementals» began sounding theiralarms against godly beratements.

Even the day before yesterday this is what I exactly told my friend -LRB--LRB-(I'm tired of watching Ozil on the flank as he is struggling a lot & I wish him to get injured)-RRB--RRB- For me Ozil's injury is a blessing in curse we all were complaining & blaming Wenger about the formation; players selection & for using players out of position now this all problems are going to be solved thanks to Ozil's injury.

In 343 formation, ozil play as right winger, Just back to 442, where ozil play as playmaker behind striker, And enough about dlp (deep lying playmaker), xhaka is not pirlo, cazorla, and not even close to xabi alonso Jusyt play a pure dm, aka coqelin

and I'm not sure about Monreal playing as a CB, so maybe Wenger has gone back to the usual formation and his using Gibbs on the LW?

lst season at stamford bridge, was the first time i saw that 4 -1-4-1 formation being used, and for some weird reason i feel a very strange negative vibe and well all know the outcome.the manager has come back with this formation and its not yielding result, but he still sticks with it.i do nt know much about formations dear friends, but if you are playing a slow dm in arteta and a very very slow cb, then you are toast against quality teams with sound tactics.wen playing wellbeck as a lone striker, i think 4 -2-3-1, will work better, but if we have a big player like oliver (boooos), thn we can try the 4 -1-4-1, thingy cos he can hold the ball for our midfielders to run in.but on the overall, shame on wenger for not giving our defence a good cover DM.NO BODY PLAYS A SLOW DM / CB AND EXPECT TO B REGARDED AS CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.IT HURTS GUYS, REALLY HURTas a lone striker, i think 4 -2-3-1, will work better, but if we have a big player like oliver (boooos), thn we can try the 4 -1-4-1, thingy cos he can hold the ball for our midfielders to run in.but on the overall, shame on wenger for not giving our defence a good cover DM.NO BODY PLAYS A SLOW DM / CB AND EXPECT TO B REGARDED AS CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.IT HURTS GUYS, REALLY HURTAS CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.IT HURTS GUYS, REALLY HURTS.

If your CB's are awful in a 4 back system then they'll be exposed as well in a 3 back system no matter what happens.You're just delaying the time for them to get exposed and deceiving yourself.Our problem was not about formation.It was about tactics yet no one saw this and thought 3 -4-3 was our saviour.Look at our starting CB's in 4 back: Koscielny and Mustafi who are all quality.The midfield is the problem.It's not the 3 back or 4 back.In 3 back also our players are not suited for that formation hence I advice Wenger to switch back before it's too late.We need to revert to 4 back and play the right players in the centre.We needed a DM to make our midfield stable but we didn't so we have to make do with what we have.

Mexico didn't experiment, and that's fine - Miguel Herrera has talked about wanting his team to be more versatile, but they played the same formation and style as they always have under him tonight.

I do not think we can say the same thing of Alex Oxlade - Chamberlain, though, despite the boss saying a lot of good things about the dynamic England international and despite the fact that he seems to have found a new lease of life as a wing back in Wenger's new three at the back formation.

Titi may not agree about Giroud dropping to the bench as he seems to think that all Giroud needs is a partner up front, but I can't see Wenger switching to a 442 kind of formation.

Its almost as if they shit themselves and backed off of city and as Ive already said there was None in the team who wants to own the responsibility when the chips are down everyone turns their backs and more or less says «its not down to me» «its not my responsibility» and Wenger who should be appointing a player to lead when we are up against it or at least chopping and changing formations ect and revitalising the side just rants at the ref and means about offside.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

As well as his goals, Willian won both penalties and put in the kind of effort we've come to associate with him, in what will surely give his manager a bit of a headache about sticking with the 3 -5-2 formation that does not really accommodate his talentAs well as his goals, Willian won both penalties and put in the kind of effort we've come to associate with him, in what will surely give his manager a bit of a headache about sticking with the 3 -5-2 formation that does not really accommodate his talentas his goals, Willian won both penalties and put in the kind of effort we've come to associate with him, in what will surely give his manager a bit of a headache about sticking with the 3 -5-2 formation that does not really accommodate his talents.

I think all AFC supporters will get excited about those two, I will go as far to say that next season could see AFC with one of the best defs if we keep this 3 CB formation.

At the end of the day, the best formation to suit Ozil is a classic Arsenal 4 -2-3-1 which means he can play in the hole behind that striker feeding balls to the pacey wingers and striker without having to worry about tracking back too much seeing as there will be 2 midfielders behind him playing the double pivot to track back aswell as the wingers.

About that new formation, when we come up against a good team that goes 442 or 4411, I think we need to switch straight back to our old formation as that is the one that made 442 almost obsolete.

Wtf are you talking about, with 4141 formation the DM is isolated and is left to cover alot more ground where as is a 4231 one of the other Central midfielders are alot deeper to support the DM.

@Muda, I accept your formation but i would rather we use Coquelin at RB instead of Bellerin, the hype about Bellerin is becoming too much.Atleast for the few games I've watched him play he seems to be very inexperienced and always cut out of position, so i would prefer Coquelin as he has always done a good job each time he plays at RB.

But as Christmas is all about tradition and 4 -4-2 is the more traditional English formation, that is what we have used for our mid-term Premier League team of the season, made up of the eleven best - performing individuals in the league.

Above all our players are not drilled for a 4 -1-4-1 formation as they seem not to have a clue about it.

But if the academy graduate really is out of the first team frame you would think we would make a deal to free up the wages and the place in the squad, so I wonder if Wenger may just be thinking about Gibbs as the left sided wing back in the new back three formation, or at least as his second option after the summer signing Kolasinac.

Also Arsene will look inwards first if he is thinking about Xhaka as being a problem, the formation change might have been brought about to accommodate Xhaka in the first place.

Yes I enjoyed the win and it was good but enough already... all this talk about new formation that should have been used since five years ago is shameful to me seeing as we tried it when Chelsea is making it look like the Almighty formation...

Dear wenger please learn to setup formation as well as Tactics before you talk about signings.

I have strong reservations about 3 at the back as the default formation.

Chamakh looks too isolated up the top on his own and he's certainly nowhere near as good as RVP in keeping the ball so I can really only see him come good in a 442 formation with a second striker to aid him, what about Park?

Kilbane who played as a left wing back during his days as a player, wrote about why the Nigerian is thriving in Chelsea's formation under Conte in his column for the BBC.

He doesn't want to be seen as a wheeler - dealer and he doesn't want to be seen as a manager who thinks about foreign concepts like tactics or formations.

As this talk was about the role of imagination in identity formation - a particular aspect of adoption - I didn't have time to go into the complexities of orphan statistics.

Join moderator Leah Bloom, LMFT, a faculty member at the Chicago Center For Family Health and an adult internationally adopted person, as she leads our panel through a discussion about the intricacies of identity formation within an adopted individual.