Sentences with phrase «about fossil fuels»

But then he got concerned about the fossil fuel used in the process and the toxic materials, such as mercury, released into the air.
We can not talk about climate finance without talking about fossil fuel investment.
But enough about fossil fuels — have I mentioned forests yet?
It's almost certainly about fossil fuel interests attempting to protect their industry.
If you look at the bigger picture — which is, what are we going to do on the whole about fossil fuels and reducing and eliminating eventually our dependence on them?
A lot of nasty things are said about fossil fuels even though they are largely responsible for our longevity, our prosperity, and our comfortable lifestyles.
But it's not a solution of course, since we are still talking about fossil fuel consumption.
«When you're talking about fossil fuels, you have to factor in the land used for exploration, extraction, processing, and then transportation,» he said.
National Observer, July 13, 2017 These «missing charts» may change the way you think about fossil fuel addiction
I've recently been writing about the fossil fuel divestment movement which, according to some accounts, is «sweeping» US college campuses.
When I wrote about the fossil fuel industry looking worried, some commenters questioned my focus on divestment.
In the video above, we asked Dr. Soon about his fossil fuel funding at a climate denial event hosted by the Heritage Foundation last month — the event that wraps up Christopher Rowland's article in the Globe.
Exxon Mobil, a massive fossil fuel corporation, has a lot of money to invest in scientific research about fossil fuels.
Minister and community activist Rev. Lennox Yearwood speaks about fossil fuel divestment during one of Bill McKibben's «Do the Math» climate change presentations late last year.
Michael Gerrard, director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia Law School, said he's also expecting to see «a lot more litigation about fossil fuel extraction, especially on federal lands and waters,» as the Trump administration seeks to expand domestic energy production.
Michael Mann, a distinguished professor of meteorology at Pennsylvania State University, said the executive order is a sign that the current government cares more about fossil fuel energy profits than the health of the planet.
MC: So, no motive to deceive from the scientists, but what about the fossil fuel industry, the oil and coal industries, who have a vested interest perhaps in the status quo.
So, once again, it is ever more obvious that the collective lot of enviro - activists have only one source for their unsupportable accusation about a fossil fuel industry denial mating, the worthless set of «reposition global warming» memos, and the one guy responsible for gaining media traction for them, Ross Gelbspan.
«In this case, Exxon scientists knew about fossil fuels causing global warming and Exxon took internal actions based on its knowledge of climate change,» according to DeSaulnier and Lieu's letter.
If UNCERTAINTY ABOUT THE PHYSICS OF CLIMATE is a BIG REASON for MORE ACTION about FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS, then shouldn't uncertainty be embraced as a friend?
3) Given that in this case we do have substantial evidence of a very serious problem, UNCERTAINTY ABOUT THE PHYSICS OF CLIMATE is a BIG REASON for MORE ACTION about FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS.
And, one more thing: let's not forget that Matt Pawa, at his former law office's online page collection, had a particular article about Western Fuels suing a number of environmental organizations including Ozone Action, where it quoted David Hunter's desire to one day make a legal argument about the fossil fuel industry running a misinformation campaign.
Their opposing viewpoints about fossil fuels also highlight Musk's entrepreneurial vision - driven spirit with Buffett's down - to - earth profit - driven investment strategy.
A long time ago we weren't too bothered about fossil fuels.
Public - and private - sector interest in the process is driven by any number of concerns about fossil fuel supplies, greenhouse gas emissions, generating rural development or scientific research efforts, and building sustainable sources of energy.
«It's very mysterious at this point in time, we don't really know what's contemplated there,» Fulton says, «If you piece together the different things that have been said by the president - elect about fossil fuels, and encouraging fossil fuel development, you'd expect this would have something to do with that.»
When asked about fossil fuel subsidies in the U.S., the study's lead author says «[t] he U.S. can remove them.
What coincidence then, when talking about fossil fuels from plants from the era of huge long dead lizards (the fossil fuels are not made of the dinosaurs), that denying evidence for anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is linked to that lizard part of the brain.
I think the issue about fossil fuel «subsidies» which keeps popping up among the True Believers, needs further explanation, though.
Peer pressure, eco-activist harassment, politically correct posturing, and shared ideologies about fossil fuels, forced economic transformations and wealth redistribution via energy policies also play a major role, especially on campuses.
Donald Trump has a lot of ideas about the fossil fuel industry and how he plans to «save» coal from destruction.
OK, now, no jokes about fossil fuels: The Rolling Stones are returning to Los Angeles with a special free concert at Staples Center to raise awareness about global warming.
This prediction of cooling appears to me to be largely dependent on reasoning about fossil fuel particulates increasing.
My page on the Turnbull government exposes a number of lies about fossil fuels and renewable energy.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z