Not exact matches
Trudeau's
about - face is rooted in the Liberal vision of a global economy at the beginning of a decades - long transition
from fossil fuels to clean energy technology, says Jim Carr, minister of natural resources.
In the U.S., the cost of solar energy is now
about on par with — and in some cases, cheaper than — energy
from fossil fuels.
Sources told Reuters that White House officials are getting feedback
from fossil fuel companies
about the pros and cons of staying in the agreement.
Rive argues that when the factory is up and running it will be able to produce high - output PV cells at
about 55 cents a watt —
about a 20 % reduction
from current prices, which will help Rive get closer to his goal of making solar cheaper than
fossil fuels.
While Peabody was only down
about 10 % at the end of May 2014, the stock got crushed as the government proposed to reduce carbon emissions (stemming
from fossil fuels like coal), which would burn up even more of Peabody's bottom line.
Musk has a financial incentive for wanting the U.S. to start thinking progressively
about transitioning
from fossil fuel.
The companies include Chevron Corp., ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips Co., BP, Royal Dutch Shell and Peabody Energy Corp. «The American people deserve answers
from the
fossil fuel corporations
about their actions to massively deceive the public in regards to climate science,» Lieu and Welch wrote in a letter to their House colleagues asking for their support.
Think
about it: First Solar is developing technology to create clean, renewable power
from the sun that is cost competitive with
fossil fuels.
The current rate of burning
fossil fuels adds
about 2 ppm per year to the atmosphere, so that getting
from the current level to 1000 ppm would take
about 300 years — and 1000 ppm is still less than what most plants would prefer, and much less than either the nasa or the Navy limit for human beings.
Renewable energy: Commit to 100 percent renewable power The Climate Collaborative states that
about one - third of all the greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. come
from the burning of
fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas to produce electricity.
There are frequent rail accidents and pipeline explosions, evidence of long term water contamination esp around Dimock PA and in WY, non disclosure agreements forced on people whose health has been damaged
from exposure to toxic emissions, secrecy
about all of these issues, and climate changes caused by too much
fossil fuel emissions.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Long Island with reporters on Wednesday said he wanted to back up the rhetoric
about renewable energy with a push toward divesting the state's pension fund
from fossil fuel companies.
Many of the same warnings Mario Cuomo heard in the 1980s
about Shoreham are the same ones his son hears today
from supporters of Indian Point: Closing a nuclear plant will result in blackouts, a less reliable electric grid and increased air pollution as
fossil fuels are burned to replace the lost emissions - free nuclear power; customers could face higher bills; more than 1,000 jobs will be lost, and tax revenue for schools and towns will dissipate.
Was Teachout right
about Faso taking money
from fossil fuel companies that planned to use eminent domain?
One could frame the debate in the advantages of using less
fossil fuel, which range
from lower costs to people (an all electric car has operating costs
about 1/4 that of a gasoline vehicle), to balance of payments (less capital flowing out of the country, especially relevant to countries who import most of their oil), to terrorism (not funding it, and western influence leaving the ME, which is the basis of most ME terrorist organizations) to conflict in general (most of the major conflicts in the last 30 years have involved ME oil), to finite supply (when we run out, we'll be facing a global economic meltdown).
Bernie Sanders» campaign thinks Clinton owes the Vermont senator an apology for accusing him of «lying»
about how she accepts money
from the
fossil fuel industry.
We think we can do a much cleaner alternative, and if the governor is serious
about moving away
from burning
fossil fuels that he should be using the Empire State Plaza as a model.»
Moderator's Remarks
from Al Appleton, former Commissioner of the NYC Department of Environmental Protection and Senior Fellow at the Cooper Union: When we talk
about addressing global warming, we're talking
about disentangling 21st century society
from fossil fuel.
From there, the researchers estimated that the carbon stored in Central Congo Basin's peat is equivalent to about 20 years of fossil fuel emissions from the United States, at current ra
From there, the researchers estimated that the carbon stored in Central Congo Basin's peat is equivalent to
about 20 years of
fossil fuel emissions
from the United States, at current ra
from the United States, at current rates.
From the start, the ethanol industry has been dogged by concerns
about its net energy balance — whether ethanol requires more
fossil fuel to make than it replaces.
This relates to the whole area of development for people talking
about biofuels, which is this idea of trying to develop replacements for the conventional sorts of
fossil fuels that we have to at least — if we are going to be burning some sort of hydrocarbons of some kind — to try to get them [so] that they are being derived
from a different source, and potentially or ideally, ones that would actually burn without delivering as much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere too; that's great if you can get that.
A United Nations report released Sunday said that governments must act faster to keep global warming in check and that a radical shift
from fossil fuels to low - carbon energy such as wind, solar or nuclear power would shave only
about 0.06 of a percentage point a year off world economic growth.
«Carbon release back then looked a lot like human
fossil -
fuel emissions today, so we might learn a lot
about the future
from changes in climate, plants, and animal communities 55.5 million years ago.»
Oceans play a key role in mitigating climate change, in part because they absorb
about 25 % of global carbon - dioxide emissions
from fossil -
fuel burning and deforestation, he said.
The trend worries many local environmental groups, such as California's Surfrider Foundation or Australia's Nature Conservation Council of NSW, which are concerned
about protecting nearby ecosystems by safely disposing the concentrated brine left
from the process as well as increased
fossil -
fuel use and the resulting greenhouse gas emissions.
This is equivalent to
about 10 years» worth of
fossil fuel emissions
from countries spanning the Amazon Basin.
Kyoto regulates all sources of carbon dioxide as well as other greenhouse gases, but reliable long - term data by country are available only for carbon dioxide
from burning
fossil fuels (which accounts for
about two - thirds of the human contribution to global warming).
Currently,
about 95 percent of hydrogen production worldwide comes
from converting
fossil fuels such as natural gas into hydrogen — a process that releases large quantities of carbon dioxide into the air, said Maher El - Kady, a UCLA postdoctoral researcher and a co-author of the research.
From a climate perspective, there is some good news
about the likely decline in the growth of
fossil fuel production discussed by others at the panel, Tans said.
While fracking has become a focal point in conversations
about methane emissions, it certainly appears
from this and other studies that in the U.S.,
fossil fuel extraction activities across the board likely emit higher than inventory estimates.»
«We now know a great deal
about the harm
from the emissions
from fossil fuels,» said Frederica Perera, director of the Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health at the Mailman School of Public Health.
More optimistic Daniel Sperling, director of the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Davis, said he was more optimistic than the panel
about the move away
from fossil fuel.
In comparison, annual CO2 emissions
from fossil fuel combustion are a tiny fraction of that, or
about 5.7 gigatons.
Though he hasn't provided many specifics, Trump has publicly said he is eager to streamline the process and make it as easy as possible for energy companies to extract
fossil fuels from public lands, which are the source of
about 24 percent of America's
fossil fuels, including
about 40 percent of all the coal produced in the U.S.
Based on satellite monitoring and models that estimate the carbon released
from burning vegetation (plus or minus 50 percent), the group reckons that U.S. fires produce 290 million metric tons of carbon per year, equal to
about 5 percent of the nation's annual emissions
from fossil fuels.
The shift back to
fossil fuels, combined with rapid growth in the number of cars on the roads (see «
Fuelling Brazil's transport boom»), has worsened city smog and caused emissions in the transport sector to spike at
about 170 million tons of CO2 in 2011, up
from less than 140 million tons in 2008.
The organic matter in soils, sediments, and water may come
from decomposed land plants, dead plankton (tiny marine animals and plants), or burned wood or
fossil fuels, and it offers clues
about Earth's past and present environments.
Most of the CO2 comes
from fossil fuel burning;
about 1/6
from deforestation I think — William]
By comparison, scenarios for
fossil fuel emissions for the 21st century range
from about 600 billion tons (if we can keep total global emissions at current levels) to over 2500 billion tons if the world increases its reliance on combustion of coal as economic growth and population increase dramatically.
Abstract: Black carbon (BC)
from biomass and
fossil fuel combustion alters chemical and physical properties of the atmosphere and snow albedo, yet little is known
about its emission or deposition histories.
Knisely projected that unless
fossil fuel use was constrained, there would be «noticeable temperature changes» and 400 parts per million of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the air by 2010, up
from about 280 ppm before the Industrial Revolution.
[Response: even with tropical deforestation, most CO2 (
about a 6:1 ratio
from memory) is
from fossil fuel use.
So whenever one talks
about aerosols, one needs to put a caveat noting that greenhouse gases also come
from fossil fuels and are the dominant effect.
These researchers wanted to know more
about the role of pollution
from traffic and the industrial burning of
fossil fuels in these deaths.
Globally,
about 80 percent of human - induced carbon dioxide emissions comes
from the burning of
fossil fuels, while
about 20 percent results
from deforestation.
As the graph below
from Spracklen's News and Views article shows, the balance between warming (red shading) and cooling (blue shading) have kept the country's contribution to human - caused climate change pegged at
about 10 % in recent decades, despite soaring
fossil fuel emissions.
Read all
about climate denial scientist Willie Soon's dirty money
from petrochemical billionaire Charles Koch, coal utility Southern Company, oil giant ExxonMobil and other
fossil fuel companies to deny the science of climate change!
The World Energy Outlook 2016, released last week, is just one among an increasing line of studies showing how nations need to slow and, ultimately, phase out investment in new
fossil fuel supply infrastructure —
from oil fields and pipelines to coal mines — if they are serious
about keeping warming to 2C or less.
It also acts as a carbon sink — absorbing
about 30 % of atmospheric CO2 released
from human activities such as burning
fossil fuels...
Because this climate sensitivity is derived
from empirical data on how Earth responded to past changes of boundary conditions, including atmospheric composition, our conclusions
about limits on
fossil fuel emissions can be regarded as largely independent of climate models.