John's post was not
about fractional reserve banking — it was about the a book discussing the history of the Federal Reserve, and was interesting and insightful.
(Note now that we are not talking about a free banking system — I want to make a point
about fractional reserve systems in general and show how the problem is that the system isn't free, not that it's based on fractional reserves.)
Not exact matches
One of his views that always stuck with me on that subject, at least as a starting point for thinking
about it, was that it was somewhat nonsensical to talk
about what «equilibrium exchange rates» should be in a world of fiat currencies and
fractional reserve banking.
Here is John Carney arguing that «There's nothing
about Bitcoin that means you can't have
fractional reserve banking,» which is entirely correct but bear in mind that he's arguing against libertarian bitcoin supporters who view the absence of
fractional reserve banking as a desirable feature of bitcoin.
But while daydreaming
about these, we shouldn't forget to be in awe of the invention of
fractional -
reserve banking.
With or without a central bank,
fractional reserve banking will tend to bring
about a boom / bust cycle and thus reduce the long - term rate of economic progress.
I mean given that the
fractional reserve banking system is so over-levered, globally, but just thinking
about the U.S. for a minute if everybody put 5 % -10 % of their money in Bitcoin or some other cryptocurrencies, the whole banking system implodes on itself.