Sentences with phrase «about free speech in»

But they also contributed to a larger conversation about free speech in an era where social - media posts replace political pamphlets and the public square has increasingly moved into cyberspace.

The company's sales to a Russia - connected troll farm raise big questions about free speech in advertising and beyond.

Ken White: News and pop culture are full of controversies about free speech in the First Amendment.

An attempted performance about free speech in Cuba, however, has landed her in legal hot water.

While the decision to hold or cancel the event is entirely the business of the DUS, it once again raises the increasingly unpleasant debate about free speech in this country.

Not exact matches

Twitter has often boasted about its commitment to the principles of free speech, sometimes leading to criticism from those who felt the company was more interested in tolerating all forms of speech than in trying to ensure a harassment - free experience for its users.

Although Thiel implies in his essay that the Gawker story about Hogan's sex tape would not have been published by any right - thinking journalistic outlet, and that the First Amendment doesn't and shouldn't protect such behavior, two higher - court judges ruled before the Hogan decision that the Gawker piece was clearly covered by the Constitution's free - speech protections.

That decision, rooted in constitutional arguments about free speech, removed certain limits on corporate political donations.

Law professor Eugene Volokh, who blogs about free speech issues at the Washington Post, has made the same point in the past to argue that Google's (GOOG) choice of search results are a form of free speech.

As blame fell to Facebook for Trump's election, word of Facebook prototyping a censorship tool for operating in China escaped, triggering questions about its respect for human rights and free speech.

«Despite the level of hysteria and partisanship in American politics, we are surprised and disappointed by the unprecedented attack on a media company by an organization that purports to value free speech,» American Media officials said in a statement Tuesday about the Common Cause complaint.

His ban from visiting Britain in June 2009 has made him the «poster child» for free speech, not only for Americans concerned about the cultural shift towards totalitarianism and their rights to freedom of expression, but for people around the globe.

While I do support free speech, I can't deny my in ability to sort all this out from where I happen to be, dissociated from the major «players» having direct involvement with the situation at hand (which has gone way beyond what I thought this thread would be about, initially).

Presidential debates, increased public affairs, innovations in news coverage, fewer commercials on children «s programs, more female and minority on - air employment, greater minority ownership of stations, «free speech messages» in many cities, greater responsiveness to viewer «s letters, and a temporary reduction in violent programs — all were brought about through the efforts of the broadcast reform groups.9.

The right to offend is what free speech looks like in practice, and the whole point about free speech is you don't pick who gets to enjoy it.

You are correct about free speech: we should be American enough to accept the concept that you have the right to say what you did in your post.

After raising in a light way some deep questions about equality, democracy, and free speech, he concludes: «The ultimate failure of the United States will probably not derive from the problems we see or the conflicts we wage.

Consensus or not, most of the proposed ban's pushback has come from concerns about free speech, that holiest of cows in the Western world.

It clearly shows that in these marginal seats, the key battleground seats where the general election will be won and lost, voters are very concerned about threats to religious liberty and free speech.

«In some of these cases, the people releasing these films or cartoons are trying to make a statement about free speech, which is fair enough,» says Bergen, referring to the film and other provocative recent depictions of Mohammed, Islam's founding prophet.

However, we, as Americans should know better about the ramifications of our actions before we use our wonderful right of «free speech» as it could possibly get someone killed by some murderous fanatic half way around the world, or... even possibly here in our own country.

In a statement, Broglio's office said: «Archbishop Broglio and the Archdiocese stand firm in the belief, based on legal precedent, that such a directive from the Army (about not reading the letter) constituted a violation of his Constitutionally - protected right of free speech and the free exercise of religion, as well as those same rights of all military chaplains and their congregants.&raquIn a statement, Broglio's office said: «Archbishop Broglio and the Archdiocese stand firm in the belief, based on legal precedent, that such a directive from the Army (about not reading the letter) constituted a violation of his Constitutionally - protected right of free speech and the free exercise of religion, as well as those same rights of all military chaplains and their congregants.&raquin the belief, based on legal precedent, that such a directive from the Army (about not reading the letter) constituted a violation of his Constitutionally - protected right of free speech and the free exercise of religion, as well as those same rights of all military chaplains and their congregants.»

When one party has elevated lifestyle libertinism to the first of constitutional principles (and is prepared to kill unborn children, jettison free speech, and traduce religious freedom in service to hedonism), while the other is prepared to nominate a fantasist who spun grotesque fairy tales about an alleged connection between an opponent's family and Lee Harvey Oswald shortly before he closed the deal?

Just a friendly update from California that I have now spent my fifth day working on contacting all of the big free speech legal advocates in Canada and the United States (and those important organizations in Europe as well) about this story and the entire issue of Free Speech (which these public figure pastors in the U.S. who are nationally known want to silenfree speech legal advocates in Canada and the United States (and those important organizations in Europe as well) about this story and the entire issue of Free Speech (which these public figure pastors in the U.S. who are nationally known want to silenFree Speech (which these public figure pastors in the U.S. who are nationally known want to silence).

Hi David, Just a note that even though I am in California, I have contacted top Canadian free speech legal experts about what this US group is doing to you and the you've been «warned» part.

The NFL Players» Union issued a statement defending its members right to free speech, saying «It is a source of enormous pride that some of the best conversations about these issues have taken place in our locker rooms in a respectful, civil and thoughtful way that should serve as a model for how all of us can communicate with each other.

We live in a country a free speech and freedom of religon, how about we all start practicing it and not persecute or belittle someone for what they believe and how they practice it.

But giving your mom a speech about how you are morally superior to her for not eating animals is false logic, considering the slave labor used to produce your fruits, vegetables, nuts, and other delicious animal - free ingredients (coffee, sugar, bananas, mangos, berries, peaches, and cashews are just a few examples of foods imported from the third world where workers are severely mistreated and underpaid, or farmed by underpaid Mexican immigrants in the US).

The result you're complaining about is the very result we should hope for in a society that truly values free speech.

In each of these cases, talk with your child's teacher about the problem, and make an appointment with the school's speech - language pathologist for a free speech and language screening.

The debate over the Cecil Rhodes statue in Oxford University is not about free speech, it's about who we want to celebrate.

It's also part of a broader problem, in that politically - minded young people often seem instinctively uninterested in JS Mill - type arguments for free speech, and consider censorship questions as more about protecting certain groups from emotional pain than protecting individuals from those who would stop them participating in debate.

But instead of attending more closely to these circumstances in order to think seriously about the changing place and politics of free speech in contemporary India, its proponents have lapsed into an anachronistic narrative about circumscribing the reach of religious dogma in social life.

The board, following a discussion about the influence of money in state politics and the merits of free speech in political donations, deadlocked its vote between the two Republican and two Democratic commissioners.

Margaret Thatcher lauded in the maiden speeches of Mike Freer, Louise Bagshawe and Nick Boles (who also had a word or two to say about Quentin Davies)

A federal judge temporarily barred NYC from enforcing a new law that would require crisis pregnancy centers to disclose more information about their services, scolding city officials for offending «free speech principles» in the process.

President - elect Donald Trump, in a free - flowing speech last night at a dinner honoring his running mate, Mike Pence, jabbed at his new Republican allies and his critics alike, questioned the ethics of «super PACs» and talked about creating a «merit - based» immigration system.

We labelled this pineapple «Mohammed», to encourage discussion about blasphemy, religion, and liberty, as well as to celebrate the fact that we live in a country in which free speech is protected, and where it is lawful to call a pineapple by whatever name one chooses.

The board majority first sought his removal for the comments published in Artvoice about the Obamas, but then quickly changed course on the advice of their attorney, who said that would be infringing on Paladino's right to free speech.

The accusations against Paladino in the Buffalo School Board's petition do not include his remarks about the Obamas, but the Buffalo businessman has brought them up in his defense for allegedly leaking the teacher negotiation details, saying it's part of a conspiracy to deny him his first amendment rights for free speech under the US Constitution.

His first speech as Lib Dem leader was about free schools in Sweden, he said.

The School Board — advised by legal counsel about Paladino's free speech rights — is taking the approach that Paladino should be removed from the board because he publicly shared information that was discussed in executive session.

Her speech also hit home for students in the crowd when she talked about pushing for a debt - free education, something Bernie Sanders has also talked about.

The accusations against Paladino in the Buffalo School Board's petition do not include his remarks about the Obamas, but the Buffalo businessman has brought them up in his defense for allegedly leaking the teacher negotiation details, saying it's part of a conspiracy to deny him his first amendment rights fo free speech under the US Constitution.

We can now create our own content and share it with audiences large and small, so we should worry about anyone who aims to stand in the way of the transmission of free speech — just as we would worry about someone who would try to block you from telephoning a friend, or using a fax machine to send them a document.

These meetings are free of cost and held in a public space, typically beginning with a short speech from an elected official and then an open Q&A, where attendees can ask questions about a piece of legislation or a specific issue.

Free to join Search for other singles by location About MembershipDefinition, a list of Hook Examples in common speech, Usage, literature.

Dublin About Blog In general, I write here about private law, free speech, and cyber law; and, in particular, I write about Irish law and education poAbout Blog In general, I write here about private law, free speech, and cyber law; and, in particular, I write about Irish law and education policIn general, I write here about private law, free speech, and cyber law; and, in particular, I write about Irish law and education poabout private law, free speech, and cyber law; and, in particular, I write about Irish law and education policin particular, I write about Irish law and education poabout Irish law and education policy.

As the tension escalates, there are some poking between the ribs questions too about free speech and facts in the post-truth era.

Ken Loach (Winner, Palme - d'or 2006, The Wind that Shakes the Barley) paints a romantic drama about a leftist leader, and a 1930s Ireland that celebrates free speech and thought in the face of oppressive dogma.