This dramatically smaller value can directly affect the way people think
about fugitive methane.
Not exact matches
Industry, with the full support of the administration, continues the fait accompli of radically expanded natural gas fracking across the country, with serious unresolved issues
about fugitive atmospheric
methane emissions and the potential for contamination of drinking water aquifers — and with no adequate federal regulatory structure in place.
More and more people are learning
about how bad fracking is, even Robert F. Kennedy jr, came out and publicly admitted that Fracking is not a safe bridge away from fossil fuels and is worse for climate change then using coal because of the
fugitive methane emissions that are released in the fracking process's.
But thanks to the University of Texas, the Environmental Defense Fund, and others, we have taken a tremendous step forward in filling in our knowledge
about the exact nature of
fugitive methane emissions.
But while scientists know that «
fugitive methane» is a concern, there's much uncertainty
about the full extent of the problem.
We know a lot more
about where
fugitive methane emissions come from and how to address them.