That's why I have stopped listening to climate change experts because at the end of the day, they know little more
about future climate trends than the average Joe.
Not exact matches
The motivation for the MCA arose from citizens and organizations in Montana who have expressed interest in receiving timely and pertinent information
about climate change, including information
about historical variability, past
trends, and projections of
future impacts as they relate to topics of economic concern.
Therefore, it is a (by some deliberately promoted) misunderstanding to draw conclusions from such a short
trend about future global warming, let alone
climate policy.
There is compelling evidence that the atmosphere's rising CO2 content - which alarmists consider to be the chief culprit behind all of their concerns
about the
future of the biosphere (via the indirect threats they claim it poses as a result of CO2 - induced
climate change)- is most likely the primary cause of the observed greening
trends.
I realize I was trespassing with anecdote in a discussion
about science and
climate, which requires more than a decade to begin to show
trends, but it seems to me that as recent incidents display to some extent
climate change under way, it is unwise to ignore the
future, which might just accelerate rather than boinging back to neutral.
As pointed out in Part I, NTZ shifts the focus from PCF08's look to
future climate projections to a view of what scientists were saying
about the recent mid-century cooling
trend.
However, internal
climate variability creates irreducible uncertainty in the projected
future trends in snow resource potential, with
about 90 % of snow - sensitive basins showing potential for either increases or decreases over the near - term decades.
Although the NAO is the dominant pattern of atmospheric circulation variability, accounting for
about half of the total winter SLP variance on both interannual and multi-decadal time scales, other large - scale structures of internal circulation variability will also undoubtedly contribute to uncertainty in
future climate trends.
These assessments are intended to inform the nation
about «observed changes in
climate, the current status of the
climate, and anticipated
trends for the
future.»
Global hazards, global hazard
trends, global hazard patterns
Climate change and its causes, global warming impacts and options The challenge of global hazards for the
future GOING GLOBAL Globalisation, global groupings, global networks Population and roots, on the move, world cities The challenge of a globalising world AS Unit 1 — Global Challenges Slide 1 GCE 2008 Geography Assessment for Unit 1 — Global / hold differing views
about this global trade (10) / relation to topic U - Understand how to classify /
However, there remains uncertainty in the rate of sea ice loss, with the models that most accurately project historical sea ice
trends currently suggesting nearly ice - free conditions sometime between 2021 and 2043 (median 2035).12 Uncertainty across all models stems from a combination of large differences in projections among different
climate models, natural
climate variability, and uncertainty
about future rates of fossil fuel emissions.
Policymakers, planners, investors and vulnerable communities need information
about future climate so that they can prepare for expected
trends and changes.
The discrepancy between recent observed and simulated
trends in global mean surface temperature has provoked a debate
about possible causes and implications for
future climate change projections.
Our Sean Sublette talked with Weather Underground on the Weather Channel
about how a changing
climate will affect the
future of baseball, from the seasonal temperature
trends to the health of players and fans.
While there is general agreement
about the modern global warming
trend (since 1850), scientific controversies increase as
climate research moves further back in time, and predictions move further into the
future.
In this chapter we make no specific assumptions
about the rate and direction of technological change into the
future, recognising that very wide ranges of potentials will exist at the local and organisational levels at which
climate vulnerability and responses will often be shaped, and also that the knowledge base referenced in the chapter reflects a range of assumptions
about future trends.