The «basket of technologies» way of talking
about geoengineering puts the focus on «technologies» as «devices» or things, objects, rather than where the focus should be: upon activities or practices.
Not exact matches
Prior to the pivotal 2006 intervention by Paul Crutzen (22), which «opened the floodgates» (15), there prevailed a near - unanimous taboo against
geoengineering research precisely because of anxieties
about the political uses to which it could be
put.
Power structure funded disinformation individuals and sources, of course, never mention chemical ice nucleation (and its use by the
geoengineers) while
putting out completely false information
about «global cooling» or «global warming is a hoax».
In an email to the Guardian he says: «Climate change is no longer something we can aim to do something
about in a few decades» time, and that we must not only urgently reduce CO2 emissions but must urgently examine other ways of slowing global warming, such as the various
geoengineering ideas that have been
put forward.»
I don't think any glaring lie
about the ongoing global
geoengineering programs has enraged me so much as the criminal lies contained in the total propaganda site posted below
put out by NASA.