Sentences with phrase «about getting these presents»

(Don't let that beard fool you — this jolly man is no joke when it comes to acrobatic awesomeness, and she's super serious about getting these presents where they're going.)

Not exact matches

It's true that focusing on the present helps you get tasks done faster, but working on your next day's to - do lists will help in two ways: First, you'll help your future self by setting a prioritized list of items in advance, and second, you'll be clearing your mind of tasks you don't need to worry about today.

If I talk about selling, persuading and negotiating, you may get an image of a past experience or something you were told about salespeople that would take you out of the present conversation.

When it comes to getting promoted, you want to present yourself in a way that feeds into the biases that bosses» have about what makes someone promotable.

Be realistic about financial estimates and projections: «When you present a plan to bankers and financiers, or even to your employees, people will get way more excited about what's real rather than some huge thing that's never going to happen,» says Ciccarelli.

If you don't feel as if you're investing for the future, it's hard to get fired up about sacrificing in the present.

This is a quote from the book that captures the powerful positive feeling you get from this book about the opportunity we all have to live in the present and to act, to create positive change in your life and the lives of others.

This is what Albom's book did for me: It got me thinking about how fortunate I have been to have wonderful people guide me during my career and helped me refocus my efforts on being present as a mentor, a guide, a teacher, and a student.

Americans usually get shocked and offended when presented with the worst stereotypes about people.

Whether you've had to spend a chunk of change lately for presents, bills or something else, it's easy to get stressed about having a relatively low income and high expenses.

On her fourth day of shooting last season, the show's producers approached her warily to ask if she was getting notes from the presenting entrepreneurs, because she knew a surprising amount about each industry.

On July 1, Canada is getting a fun present for its 147th birthday: new anti-spam laws.Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation, or CASL, is coming into effect and it's fair to say there's some confusion about it.

More specifically, it's about who gets to fill the U.S. demand for lumber in the event of a hot construction market like the present one, when American supply falls short.

All leaders were present, and before QP got underway, Guy Caron, Andrew Scheer, and Marco Mendicino made statements about the van attack in Toronto yesterday.

We need to focus on leveraging the platform that we have, the food is cravable and I think there «s opportunities to use what we have and present it in new forms, new varieties to get people just reengaged with what they love about Chipotle.

While there are many different checkpoints for selecting the right annuity for you, this article presents three key tips that can help get you started by finding the right life insurer, understanding how your contract is protected under the State Guaranty Association, and asking about fees and other sales charges before you buy a contract.For more information, visit the Protective Life Learning Center.

That might get in the way of the Goldilocks theme in the coming weeks, but we don't have strong directional expectations about the economy at present, and we don't observe markers of recession as yet.

I am getting the most recent data about the present circumstance of the business advertise.

The themes in it [are] the ever - present themes of adultery, as well as a pretty heavy drinking theme in the song (which probably comes from the fact that I drink pretty heavily), but the most interesting part of it to me, the thing I was most excited about when I wrote it was the bridge toward the end of the song where there's a car fire in the parking lot and all that stuff and the comment «what a cruel God we've got.»

It seems that God's glory was about to leave the Temple, and God was about to have got solely one single place, where he wanted to be present: The Christian Church.

First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)

I don't want to get too lost in the technical weeds on this text, which would be easy to do, since there is a great debate among top Greek scholars about how to understand the «time» of present participles in Greek.

I have been accused of nonsense, and not presenting facts... interesting I still hve not recieved an answer from you geniuses out there, from this ignoramus, as to how it all happened... Oh wait, someone said random chance over millions and billions of years... laughable... that is about the same odds as a windstorm blowing through a junkyard and making a fully functional 747... the odds are infinestimal... It has also been suggested that I just google my questions in order to get my answers... Who wrote the answers??

much less have all those present... second... I still sick and tired of this abuse of separation of church and state... you people need to get a history lesson in how it all came about and the intentions..

Many of them gave me the impression they felt rather guilty about their feelings that the church could get along with good language from the past if it could not find anything in the present that was not ugly.

If a man looks at a woman with the intent to have sex with her, or even just cat - calls her, it's because of how * she's * dressed, or how * she * presents herself, and * she's * always the one who is encouraged to do something about it, while the men get a free pass because hormones (or whatever excuse).

To people like the present reviewer, who were lectured by scholars who discouraged this practice in favour of getting to know the text of a work, for example the Republic of Plato, without bothering about the background, the approach of most of the papers in this volume is novel and challenging.

At the present and with this hot media publicity exposure only The King of KSA has the Holy Power if to do any thing about for her getting a lower sentence or be released for deportation any where on Earth!!

Here's another one: An entirely natural wormhole opened in the space - time continuum, and a guy from the present got sent into the past, and told someone about the Big bang theory, and that story made it into the Quran.

Just like anything we get excited about, we want to share it, so when a leader learns something that challenges or inspires them they bring it to the table and present it to others, furthering the impact and ripple effect.

When I write in my book The Atonement of God that God was not angry about sin, and did not need Jesus to die so that we could be forgiven, people get upset that I am presenting a God who looks and acts just like Jesus Christ instead of like a Hitlerian Zeus.

However, I have, and I know other pastors who have, let their concerns about «teh bottom line» get completely in the way of being able to be truly present to people.

The Economist presents itself as a definitive source for news and interpretation, so it would help if it wasn't quite so tendentious when writing about the Catholic Church and was a little more careful to get its facts right.

When they got on the phone with their new principal to ask her about all this, they reported that she «presented incomplete answers, conflicting dates and inconsistencies in her responses.»

John, to present that as a counter example is proof you need to get yourself up to date on that issue and learn what the Galileo case really was about.

So, I think that there is no getting around that fact that if the present model were correct, it would call for some revisions in current ideas about the determinants of physical fields.

When a Crusade Evangelist gets all the glamor, glitz, and glory of presenting the «Gospel» to millions of people, and the people hear a message about being born again, and then those who respond attend a church without all the glamor, glitz, and glory, and they hear a message about discipleship, following Jesus, danger, famine, persecution, and suffering, they rightfully feel that somebody is not being honest.

Because I am struggling with how to present my view about the violence of God in the Old Testament in a way that makes sense and in a way that does not get me branded as a heretic.

So far, I have presented most of the major theories about how to understand the Violence of God in the Old Testament, and rather than just blurt out why my view is, I am going to lead you through the theological and Scriptural reasoning that I went through to get to my view.

At the same time I have tried to look at prayer in a new way, by getting at its roots, by relating it to the kind of world we know nowadays to be ours, and by speaking about it in the light of present - day understanding of our selfhood.

She wants me to take over if I'm interested — it could count as my scholarly project that I need in order to graduate from my residency program, and I could potentially get published / go to national conferences to present about it.

I wanted to give you guys a chance to get a present that I totally want for myself... because, isn't that what birthdays are all about?

I think what's better about Roiboos teas is that you don't get the tannins that are present in regular tea that tend to make it bitter.

Well, last year when I presented at Paleo f (x) I got to meet the folks behind Vital Proteins, a brand I had heard of but didn't know much about.

While it's not weird for us to look forward to these events; what I find disturbing is that we spend so much time waiting to get somewhere else, that we sometimes forget about the current; we don't know how to enjoy the present; and what's worst of all — we may even completely ignore the here and the now.

By the way, I got your book as a present for the seccond time now:p I guess ranting on facebook about your recipes made quite the impression on my friends!

«Mayor Ford has presented us with a once - in - a-lifetime teaching moment about the dangers of addiction and we sincerely hope that he gets well soon.

Phil, thanks mate, I've been saying the same thing since about 2008 every time I get fed up with the present situation, my mates laugh at me now.

The prem teams get so much money now they can afford the best managers in the world and then buy the best players and if u think about what arsenal have done it's obvious we have stagnated with the same manager, spending the same amount of money playing the same tactics which never won the league in the first place (not including wengers first decade or so) so the past does not represent the present when every other team has improved so much!

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits