Have you heard anything
about the global climate data cited in this editorial that just came out - or what would you say to this argument against global warming?
The impact of these results is wide - reaching, and Dr Pullen suggests that it may even change how we think
about global climate data: «Climate models need to incorporate genetic elements because at present most do not, and their predictions would be much improved with a better understanding of plant carbon demand.»
Not exact matches
Using
climate models and
data collected
about aerosols and meteorology over the past 30 years, the researchers found that air pollution over Asia — much of it coming from China — is impacting
global air circulations.
Because elements of this system are poorly understood and poorly represented in
global climate models, collecting real - time, complementary
data from a variety of areas will go a long way toward improving scientists ability to use these models for making accurate predictions
about Earths
climate.
I also agree with Ken Caldeira, a
climate scientist at the Carnegie Institution and Stanford University, who said the basics were clear long ago and that the response to
global warming is more
about ethics and economics than
data:
Mike's work, like that of previous award winners, is diverse, and includes pioneering and highly cited work in time series analysis (an elegant use of Thomson's multitaper spectral analysis approach to detect spatiotemporal oscillations in the
climate record and methods for smoothing temporal data), decadal climate variability (the term «Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation» or «AMO» was coined by Mike in an interview with Science's Richard Kerr about a paper he had published with Tom Delworth of GFDL showing evidence in both climate model simulations and observational data for a 50 - 70 year oscillation in the climate system; significantly Mike also published work with Kerry Emanuel in 2006 showing that the AMO concept has been overstated as regards its role in 20th century tropical Atlantic SST changes, a finding recently reaffirmed by a study published in Nature), in showing how changes in radiative forcing from volcanoes can affect ENSO, in examining the role of solar variations in explaining the pattern of the Medieval Climate Anomaly and Little Ice Age, the relationship between the climate changes of past centuries and phenomena such as Atlantic tropical cyclones and global sea level, and even a bit of work in atmospheric chemistry (an analysis of beryllium - 7 measure
climate record and methods for smoothing temporal
data), decadal
climate variability (the term «Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation» or «AMO» was coined by Mike in an interview with Science's Richard Kerr about a paper he had published with Tom Delworth of GFDL showing evidence in both climate model simulations and observational data for a 50 - 70 year oscillation in the climate system; significantly Mike also published work with Kerry Emanuel in 2006 showing that the AMO concept has been overstated as regards its role in 20th century tropical Atlantic SST changes, a finding recently reaffirmed by a study published in Nature), in showing how changes in radiative forcing from volcanoes can affect ENSO, in examining the role of solar variations in explaining the pattern of the Medieval Climate Anomaly and Little Ice Age, the relationship between the climate changes of past centuries and phenomena such as Atlantic tropical cyclones and global sea level, and even a bit of work in atmospheric chemistry (an analysis of beryllium - 7 measure
climate variability (the term «Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation» or «AMO» was coined by Mike in an interview with Science's Richard Kerr
about a paper he had published with Tom Delworth of GFDL showing evidence in both
climate model simulations and observational data for a 50 - 70 year oscillation in the climate system; significantly Mike also published work with Kerry Emanuel in 2006 showing that the AMO concept has been overstated as regards its role in 20th century tropical Atlantic SST changes, a finding recently reaffirmed by a study published in Nature), in showing how changes in radiative forcing from volcanoes can affect ENSO, in examining the role of solar variations in explaining the pattern of the Medieval Climate Anomaly and Little Ice Age, the relationship between the climate changes of past centuries and phenomena such as Atlantic tropical cyclones and global sea level, and even a bit of work in atmospheric chemistry (an analysis of beryllium - 7 measure
climate model simulations and observational
data for a 50 - 70 year oscillation in the
climate system; significantly Mike also published work with Kerry Emanuel in 2006 showing that the AMO concept has been overstated as regards its role in 20th century tropical Atlantic SST changes, a finding recently reaffirmed by a study published in Nature), in showing how changes in radiative forcing from volcanoes can affect ENSO, in examining the role of solar variations in explaining the pattern of the Medieval Climate Anomaly and Little Ice Age, the relationship between the climate changes of past centuries and phenomena such as Atlantic tropical cyclones and global sea level, and even a bit of work in atmospheric chemistry (an analysis of beryllium - 7 measure
climate system; significantly Mike also published work with Kerry Emanuel in 2006 showing that the AMO concept has been overstated as regards its role in 20th century tropical Atlantic SST changes, a finding recently reaffirmed by a study published in Nature), in showing how changes in radiative forcing from volcanoes can affect ENSO, in examining the role of solar variations in explaining the pattern of the Medieval
Climate Anomaly and Little Ice Age, the relationship between the climate changes of past centuries and phenomena such as Atlantic tropical cyclones and global sea level, and even a bit of work in atmospheric chemistry (an analysis of beryllium - 7 measure
Climate Anomaly and Little Ice Age, the relationship between the
climate changes of past centuries and phenomena such as Atlantic tropical cyclones and global sea level, and even a bit of work in atmospheric chemistry (an analysis of beryllium - 7 measure
climate changes of past centuries and phenomena such as Atlantic tropical cyclones and
global sea level, and even a bit of work in atmospheric chemistry (an analysis of beryllium - 7 measurements).
On July 23, I wrote
about the rocky rollout, prior to peer review, of «Ice Melt, Sea Level Rise and Superstorms: Evidence from Paleoclimate
Data,
Climate Modeling, and Modern Observations that 2 °C
Global Warming is Highly Dangerous.»
It's an exciting time, though, with all this new
data about global sea temperature, sea level and other features of
climate....
Two days after the talk, Mr. Gore was sharply criticized for using the
data to make a point
about global warming by Roger A. Pielke, Jr., a political scientist focused on disaster trends and
climate policy at the University of Colorado.
What we know
about global warming comes from thousands of scientists pouring over countless
data sets, conducting experiments to figure out how the
climate works and scrutinizing every aspect of each other's work.
Steven E. Koonin, once the Obama administration's undersecretary of energy for science and chief scientist at BP, stirred up a swirl of turbulence in
global warming discourse this week after The Wall Street Journal published «
Climate Science is Not Settled,» his essay calling for more frankness about areas of deep uncertainty in climate science, more research to narrow error ranges and more acknowledgement that society's decisions on energy and climate policy are based on values as much a
Climate Science is Not Settled,» his essay calling for more frankness
about areas of deep uncertainty in
climate science, more research to narrow error ranges and more acknowledgement that society's decisions on energy and climate policy are based on values as much a
climate science, more research to narrow error ranges and more acknowledgement that society's decisions on energy and
climate policy are based on values as much a
climate policy are based on values as much as
data.
Given all the oversimplified assertions over the years
about Himalayan glaciers in a warming
global climate, it's great to see a committee assembled by the National Academy of Sciences weigh in on the question with some data - based findings in a new report, «Himalayan Glaciers: Climate Change, Water Resources, and Water Security.
climate, it's great to see a committee assembled by the National Academy of Sciences weigh in on the question with some
data - based findings in a new report, «Himalayan Glaciers:
Climate Change, Water Resources, and Water Security.
Climate Change, Water Resources, and Water Security.»
Just as missing
data in some areas of
climate science does nt prevent us from making rational statements
about global warming, so to the fact of missing mails does not prevent us from describing clearly what we do know
about the mails.
From
Climate Change Dispatch Peter Ferrara — Forbes Blogs — February 24, 2014 If you look at the record of
global temperature
data, you will find that the late 20th Century period of
global warming actually lasted
about 20 years, from the late 1970s to the late 1990s.
Lesson 3 examines how scientists gather
data about climate change and finally lesson 4 examines the evidence for and against
global warming.
Dr. Parkinson, the Aqua project scientist, says some of the uncertainties
about global warming and
climate change arise from conflicting
data gathered by different instruments at different times in different parts of the world.
Then, in 2009, the exposure of emails between the «scientists» responsible for the
data the UN Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) was putting out to scare the pants off of everyone
about «
global warming» — since dubbed Climategate — revealed they were not only rigging the computer models, but were increasingly worried that the planet had entered a new, perfectly natural, cooling cycle.
Aside from continuing to misunderstand that the «missing heat» is
about having an inadequate
global climate observational network (mainly because we don't have good measurements of deep ocean heat), observational
data have demonstrated that water vapor, and likely clouds, are indeed positive feedbacks.
The apparent attempts to cover up problems with temperature
data from the Chinese weather stations provide the first link between the email scandal and the UN's embattled
climate science body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, as a paper based on the measurements was used to bolster IPCC statements about rapid global warming in recent d
climate science body, the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, as a paper based on the measurements was used to bolster IPCC statements about rapid global warming in recent d
Climate Change, as a paper based on the measurements was used to bolster IPCC statements
about rapid
global warming in recent decades.
The unfortunate use of the term «pause / hiatus» has seeped over into the general
climate scientist population now: this has had the effect of inadvertently framing discussions over the
global temperature
data as being
about explaining the so - called pause, even though the very notion isn't statistically supported.
Further the historic
data leads me to believe your better talking
about climate change,
global warming could be very short lived.
Keep in mind, also, that the
data are measured over a time period that largely predates the polarization related to
global warming — so using that study as a way to confirm assertions
about the impact of the
climate wars on public trust in scientists is motivated reasoning in its purest form.
«Causes of differences in model and satellite tropospheric warming rates» «Comparing tropospheric warming in
climate models and satellite
data» «Robust comparison of
climate models with observations using blended land air and ocean sea surface temperatures» «Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series and its impact on recent temperature trends» «Reconciling warming trends» «Natural variability, radiative forcing and
climate response in the recent hiatus reconciled» «Reconciling controversies
about the «
global warming hiatus»»
All these years Steve has maintained a very clear (and always polite) stance: he proposed himself to audit some
data, models, procedures and conclusions, while not defending or declaring any particular position
about the claims made by
Climate Science regarding anthropogenic climate change, global warming and other similar
Climate Science regarding anthropogenic
climate change, global warming and other similar
climate change,
global warming and other similar issues.
Overall, these observational
data underscore the concerns
about global climate change.
«At «A Day of Examining the
Data,» the December 7 counter-conference to COP21, the Nongovernmental International Panel on
Climate Change (NIPCC) released a report titled «Why Scientists Disagree
About Global Warming.»
Second, the same echo chamber that promoted Steve McIntyre's criticism of the Hockey Stick is now fully engaged accusing scientists of manipulating
data to increase
global concern
about climate change.
In many cases, their agendas are based upon questionable scientific
data and erroneous claims
about global climate change.
We consider several important
climate impacts and use evidence from current observations to assess the effect of 0.8 °C warming and paleoclimate
data for the effect of larger warming, especially the Eemian period, which had
global mean temperature
about +2 °C relative to pre-industrial time.
ORIGINAL POST (4 February): Early today, AGU's former Board member John Bates published a letter outlining what he believes to be mismanagement of
climate science
data in a highly - cited scientific paper, «Possible artifacts of
data biases in the recent
global surface warming hiatus» (Tom Karl, et al. 2015)... I know many of you will have concerns or questions
about this news, and I strongly encourage you to share those thoughts with us here, or in an email to
[email protected]
Transient
Climate Sensitivity (TCS) is a more realistic way to evaluate the actual
global warming effects of CO2 that can be validated with actual
data, but TCS is rarely reported in peer - reviewed paper or media articles, because the sensitivity is
about half the ECS value and is not so alarming.
Climate science deniers are very fond of showing extremely deceptive temperature graphs: They plot the
data starting in 1998, when temperatures were higher than average, so it looks like the world hasn't gotten much warmer since then, and talk
about the
global warming «pause.»
These have been combined to give us a clearer picture of what the historical
data can tell us
about global climate change over the past 161 years,» Colin Morice, climatologist at the Met Office, said in a press release.
The maps constructed by the authors show the
climate regions of the world (except Antarctica) for two periods, 1901 - 1931 and 1975 - 2005, based on CRU (UK)
global temperature
data interpolated to a 30 minute grid, average area
about 2500 km2.
Despite the embarrassment of the Climategate
data fraud and conspiracy scandal, it has not stopped the politically motivated and financially hungry at Copenhagen from making every effort to lie and mislead the public
about the actual
global climate condition.
Peiser has long opposed mainstream science's conclusions
about anthropogenic
global warming; in 2005 Peiser said he had
data which refuted an article published in Science Magazine, claiming 100 % of peer - reviewed research papers on
climate change agreed with the scientific consensus of
global warming.
The ENA is providing a rare, long - term
data set
about the response of these low clouds to changes in atmospheric greenhouse gases and aerosols — a major source of uncertainty in
global and regional
climate models.
This is NATIONAL, not
global data about only ONE of many parts of the massive body of
data that underscores the case presented by the vast majority of expert scientists who have published peer - reviewed papers concerning
climate change.
The following graph shows
data I've collected from a representative sample of Americans, asking them how many
climate scientists agreed
about human - caused
global warming.
The «Pause» in
Global Warming and a Blind Test of Contrarian Claims
about Climate Data.
Are we to forget
about the mountain of science
data on
global climate engineering?
The satellites tells us more than enough
about global temperature, terrestrial monitoring is a joke system, with all its unwarranted adjustments and faked
data, also it employs too many
climate change advocates — just sack them all.
Brietbart's James Delingpole confirming what sceptics have been observing with disgust for years and what thankfully the world is now becoming increasingly clear
about — that NASA, under the directorship of
climate change activist Gavin Schmidt and before him James Hansen (pictured) arrested 4 times for
climate activism, is scandalously tampering with one of the four major
global temperature
data sets — GISS.
The National Science Digital Library - Classic Articles
about Climate Change PAGES (Past
Global Changes) research to understand past changes IEDRO - Weather
Data Rescue Organization
The SST CCI Science Leader, Chris Merchant, has written a blog on the
Global Drifter Program, which includes information on what using the drifter array and satellite
data as two independent systems can tell us
about marine
climate change.
Party members are in fact divided
about the issue of
climate change, a new study based on three years of data from the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication finds, with 44 percent ready to admit that global warming is hap
climate change, a new study based on three years of
data from the Yale Project on
Climate Change Communication finds, with 44 percent ready to admit that global warming is hap
Climate Change Communication finds, with 44 percent ready to admit that
global warming is happening.
Reading back through the blow - by - blow account of the entire debacle does give us some fresh reasons to be mad
about the whole thing — for starters, in all the hubbub over whether or not
climate scientists were amassing a
global conspiracy or using «tricks» to hide
data (long, long debunked), it's worth remember that the one guy who actually committed a real crime has barely even been pursued.