Sentences with phrase «about global cooling in»

I take the articles about global cooling in the 70's to indicate that it was, in fact, cooling in the 60's and 70's.

I'll admit I was about 7 when I read about global cooling in Newsweek (also Popular Mechanics?)

It will be a compelling battle to try and replace the mother of all eco-scares — man - made global warming — but Climate Depot is confident that one of these test - marketed new eco-issues will catch on and you may soon see massive denials from environmentalists and UN officials that claims of a man - made global warming crisis never really existed (echoing the claims that there was no widespread concern about global cooling in the 1970's) See: Spoof: NYT in 2019: Scientists Now Say Global Warming Fears Fading Away — Claim There Never Was Warming Consensus — By Marc Morano

Much of the talk about global cooling in the 70s related to these orbital time - scales and the cause of ice ages.

There were climate scientists who speculated about global cooling in the seventies and there were journalists who wrote articles about the prospect of coming ice ages.

There were climate scientists who speculated about global cooling in the seventies and there were journalists who wrote articles about the prospect of coming ice ages.

Not exact matches

* Canada vs USA * D. Rosenberg in Barron's (Feb 27» 17) * Financial Markets History (CFA) * Global liquidity + China * Staying rational the day after Trump election * Consequences of the U.S. elections * China's Transition: Fast and Slow * The Fall in Interest Rates * Cool Streets of North America * Emerging bonds * About Millenials * Looking for safe income?

Frankly, if I wanted to worry about climate change, I would worry about global cooling again, since the sun is behaving very weakly just now, and sun - watching scientists have even dared to suggest that a reprise of the Little Ice Age is in the offing.

During the Eocene, the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was more than 560 parts per million, at least twice preindustrial levels, and the epoch kicked off with a global average temperature more than 8 degrees Celsius — about 14 degrees Fahrenheit — warmer than today, gradually cooling over the next 22 million years.

Cool It, a documentary based on his 2007 book of the same name, continues Lomborg's cry to rethink the world's responses to global warming: Abandon toothless agreements about carbon cuts and instead invest in renewable energy, along with geoengineering as a fail - safe.

So if you think of going in [a] warming direction of 2 degrees C compared to a cooling direction of 5 degrees C, one can say that we might be changing the Earth, you know, like 40 percent of the kind of change that went on between the Ice Age; and now are going back in time and so a 2 - degree change, which is about 4 degrees F on a global average, is going to be very significant in terms of change in the distribution of vegetation, change in the kind of climate zones in certain areas, wind patterns can change, so where rainfall happens is going to shift.

People who claim we can stop worrying about global warming on the basis of a cooler year or a cooler decade — or just on questionable predictions of cooling — are as naive as a child mistaking a falling tide, or a spring low tide, for a real long - term fall in sea level.

January through August of 1998 are all in the 14 warmest months in the satellite record, and that El Niño started when global temperatures were somewhat chilled; the global average temperature in May 1997 was 0.14 C (about 0.25 degrees F) cooler than the long - term seasonal norm for May.

Everything's Cool (Unrated) Cautionary documentary exposes the efforts of the fossil fuel industry lobby and conservative think tanks to manufacture an artificial debate about global warming in the face of irrefutable proof of the phenomenon provided by responsible members of the scientific community.

«If you drive 75 mph instead of 65, you would lose about 7 mpg in our new Fusion Hybrid,» says Raj Nair, Ford's global product chief, adding that cool weather and break - in miles similarly affect observed economy.

For instance, the canvas buckets give a temperature up to 1ºC cooler in some circumstances (that depend on season and location — the biggest differences come over warm water in winter, global average is about 0.4 ºC cooler) than the modern insulated buckets.

A big factor in those oscillations is ENSO — whether there is a a warm El Niño event, or a cool La Niña event makes an appreciable difference in the global mean anomalies — about 0.1 to 0.2 ºC for significant events.

It would have been helpful if, in 1975, the owners of these climate models had written to Newsweek informing them that: A) their story about global cooling was wrong because B) climate models have clearly demonstrated that temperatures are about to head up rapidly.

Another hint of cooling concerns about climate came Monday in a Rasmussen Reports poll on global warming [UPDATE, 1/24: See note at end of post], showing a rise in doubts about a human cause (details below).

The last time we had such an active tornado season was in the mid-1970s, when it was also very cold in the center of the continent (and people worried about global cooling!).

It looks suspiciously like the same list of ideas that Time magazine demanded in June 1974 with its cover story about Global Cooling.

There is no «global cooling» at all, despite Monckton's caption — the globe is warming at about 0.18 °C per decade and has been for several decades, with no sign of even a slowdown in this warming, let alone a halt or reversal.

To veterans of the Climate Wars, the old 1970s global cooling canard — «How can we believe climate scientists about global warming today when back in the 1970s they told us an ice age was imminent?»

Does anyone remember, it was in this blog also, a discussion about cooling trends in certain regions or demographics but they were simply variations within the larger scheme of global warming?

In response, here's a link to a less - than - a-minute slide show with Chinese text that features images of my actual foot (produced last year as a Public Service Announcement to raise awareness about humanity's global ecological footprint; plus the music's kinda cool, too):

If industry - generated aerosols have a more limited cooling effect than originally thought, we can clean up and scale down dirty coal plants without worrying too much about consequent sudden jumps in global temperatures of up to 2 degrees C (if I remember the upper limits of earlier studies correctly).

This year I wrote an article about how North America's amazingly variegated climate, where it's tinder dry in some places and soggy and cool elsewhere, may be one reason the country has not focused on the global warming issue as much as more compact places with more uniform climate conditions (western Europe, for instance).

spalding craft (2)-- Actually, there is an overwhelming abundance of evidence that the climate warmed to a maximum, so - called optimum, temperature at different times in different regions, but about 8 — 6 thousand years ago; it had been cooling, on average since until humans started added considerable quantities of global warming (so - called greenhouse) gases started in, say, 1850 CE.

To keep myself in good spirits, I also collect funny tidbits of humor about global warming and I made a sideblog here to collect them: I call it «Goodbye Cool World»

I was pleased to read in your blog that at least some climate scientists are now worried enough about rapid global warming that they encourage investigation of «geoengineering» ways to cool the earth.

In the late 17th Century for instance, our work has suggested about a 50 - 50 split between volcanic and solar effects (compared to the late 18th Century) which enhances the global cooling.

The amplification factors would of course also amplify large reductions in solar activity, which is important, for those who are concerned about the possibility of sudden, sever and rapid global cooling.

In the North Atlantic, the measured values differ markedly from the average global warming: the subpolar Atlantic (an area about half the size of the USA, south of Greenland) has hardly warmed up and in some cases even cooled down, contrary to the global warming trenIn the North Atlantic, the measured values differ markedly from the average global warming: the subpolar Atlantic (an area about half the size of the USA, south of Greenland) has hardly warmed up and in some cases even cooled down, contrary to the global warming trenin some cases even cooled down, contrary to the global warming trend.

Using air conditioners and electric fans to stay cool already accounts for about a fifth of the total electricity used in buildings around the world — or 10 % of all global electricity consumption today.

ENSO at least says something PHYSICAL about how heat is being entrained in the deep ocean: a La Nina ought to anchor global surface temperatures to the deep ocean and cool it.

For those interested in reading the truth about global warming and global cooling see here:

Then there's the CIA intelligence report issued in 1974 warning about the potential for global unrest from disastrous food harvests caused by global cooling.

A woman stops with her bicycle to look at the «Cool Globes» exhibition about combating global warming and climate change in the Kongens Nytorv area in the center of Copenhagen on December 19, 2009.

«To summarize - Using the 60 and 1000 year quasi repetitive patterns in conjunction with the solar data leads straightforwardly to the following reasonable predictions for Global SSTs 1 Continued modest cooling until a more significant temperature drop at about 2016 - 17 2 Possible unusual cold snap 2021 - 22 3 Built in cooling trend until at least 2024 4 Temperature Hadsst3 moving average anomaly 2035 — 0.15 5Temperature Hadsst3 moving average anomaly 2100 — 0.5 6 General Conclusion — by 2100 all the 20th century temperature rise will have been reversed, 7 By 2650 earth could possibly be back to the depths of the little ice age.

Then, in 2009, the exposure of emails between the «scientists» responsible for the data the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was putting out to scare the pants off of everyone about «global warming» — since dubbed Climategate — revealed they were not only rigging the computer models, but were increasingly worried that the planet had entered a new, perfectly natural, cooling cycle.

This morning (1-10-2015) on a website called NEWSMAX, a site by Ronald Reagan's son Michael, the lead story is something about the unnatural cold temperatures in Virginia, which is explaining away global warming by suggesting (with various kinds of scientific data) that we are just entering a «natural» 30 year cycle of cooling off.

There is pretty good evidence in the tropical ocean paleo that the LIA was about a degree cooler in ~ 1700 and since higher latitudes tend to amplify tropical advection, global temperatures could have be more than 1 C cooler.

Between global warming being exagerated (a la Schneider) and its effects actually being a net benefit through increased production of primary producers in the food chain, the chance that the earth is going to cool (Little Ice Age, end of Holocene Interglacial, Tambora II) I think it's absolutely nuts to worry about it at all.

An answer was provided by MIT scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen, who suggested that such a hypothetical removal of all the CO2 in the air would translate into a global cooling of about 2.5 degrees, presumably in Celsius (see here, about 47 minutes into the video).

Marcott paper Basically the folks at RC have probably made poor ol Marcott respond that the uptick did not matter anyway its not important, significant, robust etc don't rely on it just forget about it please etc but unfortunately for them as Ross MC on Realclimate reply, at CA says «But that is precisely what they do in Figure 3 of their paper, and it is the basis of their claim that «Global temperature, therefore, has risen from near the coldest to the warmest levels of the Holocene within the past century, reversing the long - term cooling trend that began ~ 5000 yr B.P.» Without the uptick in their proxy reconstruction this kind of statement could never have been made.

So despite over a century of a CO2 - induced warming effect, these other factors helped mitigate this warming effect from about the 1940s to 1970s, resulting in slight global cooling.

Driving this point home, the global climate cooled after 1940 until about 1975 — in spite of the copious emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the industrial boom years after World War II.

On the other hand, there is rising concern about what «global cooling» will soon do to the planet as we suffer through the beginning of the coldest winter in decades.

For instance, extreme weather events occurred with about the same frequency during the 1945 - 77 global cooling period as they do today, yet no climate scientist pointed to human activity as being responsible in the earlier period.

Contrary to what the mainstream press reports and exaggerates about «global warming,» the world has actually been in a stable - to - cooling phase since the El Nino temperature spike of 1997/98.