... [O] ngoing political debate
about global energy policy should not stand in the way of common sense action to reduce societal and environmental vulnerabilities to climate variability and change.»
Not exact matches
CNBC's Jackie DeAngelis speaks to Mohammed Barkindo, OPEC secretary general,
about Trump administration
energy policies, as well as
global oil supply.
About this Book: Fact and Fiction in
Global Energy Policy 15 Contentious Questions Benjamin K. Sovacool, Marilyn A. Brown, and Scott V. Valentine Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016
Concerns
about global warming and oil's imminent demise have caused scientists and
policy - makers to look for solutions in both the future and the past: to new technologies such as nuclear fusion, multijunction photovoltaics, and fuel cells — and to traditional
energy sources such as water power, wind power, and (sustainable) biomass cultivation (coupled with clean and
energy - efficient combustion).
However, it is not hard to see that some of those who have attempted to perpetrate this tale
about man - made
global warming are more interested in climate change as a way of increasing the power of government over all of our lives instead of implementing a sensible
energy policy.
In Shellenberger's variant, you need to add the words «in China» to any claim
about the role of an
energy technology or
policy in fighting
global warming and see if it still holds up.
I wish that people who write articles
about global warming and others who affect and make
energy policy like the environmentalists and the teary eyed soccer moms who support them, had some training in science, technology and economics.
Steven E. Koonin, once the Obama administration's undersecretary of
energy for science and chief scientist at BP, stirred up a swirl of turbulence in
global warming discourse this week after The Wall Street Journal published «Climate Science is Not Settled,» his essay calling for more frankness
about areas of deep uncertainty in climate science, more research to narrow error ranges and more acknowledgement that society's decisions on
energy and climate
policy are based on values as much as data.
«Public discourse
about global warming and climate
policies ignores fundamental physical realities
about energy and overlooks the profound benefits of...
The easiest way to develop a tax narrative is via income tax increases for the very wealthy — you can easily sell this to the 51 % of voters you need more easily than the technical details
about energy security, environmental discourse, science and uncertainty, precautionary principles, climate
policy stabalisation assessment, green legacies,
global trading schemes, UN COP frameworks ALL of which have to be defended for the
policy framework to be politically feasible.
Prior to coming to Synapse, Jenny worked as deputy editor of Singapore - based eco-business.com, where she managed online content and wrote news articles
about Asian and
global sustainability issues including
energy, carbon
policy, corporate social responsibility, clean technology, green buildings, water and waste management and livable cities.
You are correct that DoD does not talk
about national /
global energy policy (they do discuss their own internal
energy needs and
policy).
Prior to this he covered
global solar
policy, markets and technology for Solar Server, and has written
about renewable
energy for CleanTechnica, German Energy Transition, Truthout, The Guardian (UK), and IEEE Spe
energy for CleanTechnica, German
Energy Transition, Truthout, The Guardian (UK), and IEEE Spe
Energy Transition, Truthout, The Guardian (UK), and IEEE Spectrum.
Sensible economics should drive our
energy policy, not unfounded fears
about global warming.
«But there is no single story
about the future of
global energy: in practice, government
policies will determine where we go from here.»
When amateurs on a blog know more
about science than the guys on multi-million dollar grants at U.S. academic institutions informing
global energy and environment
policy, you know that the time has come to drain the swamp...
The Low - Emissions Solutions Conference (LESC) was launched last year at COP22 and is aimed at problem solving, brainstorming, and
global co-creation to inform nations
about the latest low emissions technologies for
energy,
policy, and strategy development.
Although these extremes are both unlikely they represent
about a 5 C difference in
global temperature just from the chosen fossil fuel
policy, and it is no wonder that
energy policy has got the world's attention now because we can make that much difference despite what you read in op - eds, blogs and certain thinktank reports.
The conversation that we have been having for the last two decades is
about mitigation: stabilization of atmospheric CO2 in the context of
global treaties on
energy policy.
The participants and speakers answered crucial questions
about the role of coal and low emission technologies, such as high efficiency low emission (HELE) coal technologies and Carbon Capture Use and Storage (CCUS), alongside issues around financing,
policy frameworks and meeting
global energy needs.
The greenhouse effect is one of these and lack of understanding
about it is exploited to dictate
global energy and economic
policies at great and unnecessary expense.
Moreover, the Rose Garden speech President Bush delivered that day removed any doubt that the new Bush - Cheney White House had already begun to spin the big lie
about climate change, the lie we know so well we can recite it in our sleep: scientific uncertainties regarding
global climate change are too great to make any
policy decisions, especially those that might affect the US economy (read: the US fossil fuel - based
energy economy).
We've listened to scientists who know their way around the debate within the atmospheric science and climatological communities and they're concerned that publicity
about global warming is driving
energy and environmental
policy instead of good science.
«Public discourse
about global warming and climate
policies ignores fundamental physical realities
about energy and overlooks the profound benefits of carbon - rich
energy.»
Finally, I think what the media really want to know when they ask
about Katrina and
global warming is whether the connection is «significant», and I don't think there's consensus there, partly as Gavin says, that's a matter of semantics, partly it's a genuine disagreement as to how important
global warming is where hurricanes are concerned compared to other factors, and how «significant» an argument the influence of
global warming on hurricanes is for deciding
energy policy.
President - elect Barack Obama met with former Vice President Al Gore for
about 45 minutes this afternoon to discuss
global warming and
energy policy.
«Climategate confirmed the suspicions most Americans have
about global warming,» added Ben Lieberman, a CEI Adjunct Fellow and
energy policy expert.