Sentences with phrase «about global temperatures»

Here's why we always talk about global temperature anomalies as opposed to actual global temperatures.

Scientists have high confidence about global temperature trends over recent decades because those observations are based on a massive amount of data.

Most think they are only about global temperature, but that is incorrect.

In between our series about the global temperature trend and our (upcoming) series about climate & biodiversity, let's do a short series about sea level rise, shall we?

But he did not understand that we are talking about global temperatures.

In light of some of his other claims about global temperatures and Arctic sea ice, however, I thought I'd do some of my own snooping.

We're making up for the poor job that television stations and newspapers have done conveying the truth about the global temperature record and the benefits of rising atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (C02).»

Why do we talk about a global temperature increase of 1.4 or 1.6 degrees when Greenland ice pokes up into a region where the temperature has increased much more, and the ice sheets on the Antarctic Peninsula are in an area where the temperature changes over the last few years are even greater?

I don't know what you mean by the «correct null hypothesis about the global temperature.»

Headlines like «2014: The Most Dishonest Year on Record» have been posted on climate skeptic blogs, such as Watts Up With That, and a commentator for the popular British newspaper The Daily Mail all but accused NASA of lying to the press and the public about global temperatures, despite the open discussion of uncertainties both in NASA's press materials and during a press conference with audio that is publicly accessible.

It's not just about global temperature.»

«If the global numbers come out as CRU has presented over the years, then it will strike a blow to skepticism about global temperature trend records produced by CRU and restore a good deal of credibility to this area of climate science.»

NASA says 97 % of scientists agree that their temperature graphs are accurate, and NASA, NOAA, CRU and JMA all independently agree very precisely about global temperature going back to 1880.

The result, which appears below (in red) will surprise many in the room — ... Continue reading Update about global temperatures.

Either the temperature record is sufficiently accurate to examine its evolution, including the possibility that warming may have «paused», or the record is so unreliable that no determination about global temperatures can be made.

After much bandying of words about global temperature the «debate» headed north to the Arctic.

(3) «Factcheck: Mail on Sunday's «astonishing evidence» about global temperature rise» by Zeke Hausfather of Berkley Earth, posted at Carbon Brief.

Gavin: Well, we don't have a perfect crystal ball for exactly what «business - as - usual» means, but the kind of projections that people have been looking at — which involve quite high increases in population and minimal changes in technology — you are talking about global temperature changes, by about 2070, of somewhere between two, three, five degrees Celsius, depending a little bit on the scenario, and a little bit on how sensitive the climate actually is.

The people who use this terminology can't even seem to make up their minds whether they are talking about the global temperature increase (ie, the overall temperature record, which includes effects of GHG's and noise) or just «greenhouse warming».

If the MWP did exist then what would be falsified is not just an hypothesis about global temperature but the entire meme of the special intuition of the consensus in climate science.

The use of other global temperature datasets for both NOAA's in - house dataset improvements and monthly press releases conveying information to the public about global temperatures;

Yet these proxies are being used to make claims about global temperatures (when coverage within the northern hemisphere is rather poor and coverage outside the northern hemisphere is almost nonexistent) with uncertainties of less than one degree celcius..

Titley passed on the opportunity — which Mr. Takano offered up twice — and instead talked about global temperature trends and the probability of getting heads if you flip a coin 36 times.

I know this is a cherry pick from the emails and Trenberth is not talking about global temperature, but don't know where to find the blog post where I read about this.

The most important thing is that global warming should be seen — precisely — globally, because as it gets cold in a larger area around us, it does not tell anything about the global temperature.

It informs us about the global temperature change «in the pipeline» without further change of climate forcings and it defines how much greenhouse gases must be reduced to restore Earth's energy balance, which, at least to a good approximation, must be the requirement for stabilizing global climate.

Citing the GISTEMP global anomally as he does, that should indicate that he is talking about global temperatures, but it turns out he is not.

In our «Global temperature changes of the last millennium» paper, we reviewed these estimates, discussed the assumptions and approximations they made, and attempted to assess what they tell us about the global temperature trends of the last millennium.