Sentences with phrase «about global warming denialist»

We find this to be well - argued and in line with what we have been saying about global warming denialist interventions to manipulate the communication of climate change research.

I'm not sure it's an easy line to draw, though there's certainly a difference between searching for a protocol online and writing a blog article about global warming denialists.

Not exact matches

Should this be the case, they could be deemed to be more of a threat to my grandchild than that represented by global warming denialists (many of whom are pro nuclear and concerned about peak oil and population overshoot).

We've seen a bizarre (well, if you know the climate denialist scene, not so bizarre) misreporting about Millar et al., focusing on the claim that climate models have supposedly overestimated global warming.

Could anything be more out of date, backward - looking, or antiquated in spirit than the Carlin report's repackaging of yesterday's denialist illusions and pseudoscientific nonsense about climate — fantasies that have been shot down time and again, that don't have a melting Greenland glacier's chance in a warming climate when exposed to the light of reason, yet which have been presented to the world as if they were a brilliant refutation of the CO2 - global warming link by the sharpest analytical minds in the field of climatological research?

He maunders on to accuse «climate denialists» of drawing inconvenient conclusions from the recent temperature record about the rate of global warming.

The investigative blogger Deep Climate has been working to set the record straight on how an orchestrated campaign by members of Congress, industry - funded global warming denialist groups and PR operatives, and professional «skeptics» has spread misleading information about the paleoclimate... Continue reading →

While our email exchange has taught me nothing about global warming, it has given me another insight into the perplexing mind of your typical denialist type.»

For years, the more dimwitted of the climate denialists have been yammering on about a pause in global warming.

The Denialist Party is spouting Kremlin / Gazprom canards about the supposedly greedy, dishonest climate scientists who allegedly mislead people about global warming.

What I am talking about is, that it seems to me that with regard to climate science, this blog spends far too much time responding to the phony, trumped - up «debate» fueled by denialist drivel, and not enough time addressing the legitimate scientific question as to whether it is in fact too late to prevent global warming and climate change that will be catastrophic to human civilization, not to mention the entire Earth's biosphere.

Once it became public that it was the tobacco industry pumping so many lies into the media about cigarettes the tide turned, and these global warming denialist groups are literally using the same tactics.

Discover Magazine — While temperatures rise, denialists reach lower — Phil Plait — The «Bad Astronomer» dissects an error - laden WSJ article entitled «No Need to Panic About Global Warming.»