I found myself reading it and feeling surprised that I was reading
about hawk training - not something I'm remotely interested in!
Notice the little stencils that decorate bedclothes, pay attention to the wonder embedded in an observation
about a hawk's feathers and the thought with which a derelict's skeleton is exhumed, and note with careful consideration the subjects of every piece of art on every wall.
But what
about hawks and doves?
So what
about Hawking's latest book?
«The extraordinary thing
about Hawking, besides his obvious brilliance, is the length of his illness,» says Brown.
This is a slight and irritating volume: mostly not about science at all, but
about Hawking's low opinion of the rest of us.
There is as much here about Einstein's theories of relativity, quantum theory, and the work of people like John Wheeler as there is
about Hawking and his work.
Many moviegoers may think they already know a good deal
about Hawking's achievements, but they would do themselves a disservice to miss out on Redmayne's almost perfect performance.
Most published authors know that they need to be on it yet at its core, Goodreads is all about the reader, not
about hawking our books.
I discovered so many things
about hawking & about White.
I was engaged by the hawk, especially her playing with it, and I too found some of it hard to read, but given the title, obviously I was ready to learn
about hawking; I am interested in birds, and I am always interested in other people's experience of handling grief.
My dogs are small, so I worry
about hawks or other birds of prey, mostly.
Steve Rock, Bander, 18 years When I first started, I knew nothing
about hawks other than that they were cool.
Marc Motano and I must have had a similar feeling
about Hawking.
Not exact matches
But self - learning machines are concerning enough to draw the attention of big thinkers like Musk — he referred to AI as «our biggest existential threat» — as well as Stephen
Hawking and Bill Gates, with whom Musk co-authored a letter
about the technology's dangers.
There are quite a few people out there who've said that A.I. is an existential threat: Stephen
Hawking, astronomer Royal Martin Rees, who has written a book
about it, and they share a common thread, in that: they don't work in A.I. themselves.
All of this is being done while trying to simultaneously educate clients on both sides of its business
about why anyone should get excited
about yet another «paradigm shift» in an online space where someone's almost always
hawking the next big thing.
Even Japanese and South Korean defence
hawks are cautious
about expressing the need for atomic arms.
Many prominent Republican foreign policy
hawks have already publicly expressed concern
about Tillerson's Russia ties, a problem likely exacerbated by reports that the CIA believes Russia actively interfered in the 2016 presidential election by leaking embarrassing private emails from top Democrats.
And to be sure, the sad Theranos saga is a sobering reminder of how essential a healthy skepticism and due diligence are when it comes to evaluating companies — particularly those that are secretive or excessively cryptic
about the technologies they're
hawking.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb isn't mincing words
about kratom, the increasingly popular herbal substance that's been
hawked as an alternative to painkillers and anti-depressants by companies promoting its ostensible curative properties (and supposedly innate safety as a «natural,» plant - based product).
«I try to lead as normal a life as possible, and not think
about my condition, or regret the things it prevents me from doing, which are not that many,»
Hawking, who long used a wheelchair, reportedly wrote on his website.
Stephen
Hawking, the famed physicist who died in March, has delivered his last thoughts
about the nature of the cosmos.
While I agree with you and often
hawk about the extremist in the Faiths.
Meanwhile, to
Hawking's supporters who suggest that I am not owning up to his scientific «proofs,» I believe airwx has already said it best for me — he's a THEORETICAL physicist, and having read some of his work, I'm smart enough to know that much of what he says
about God is an exercise in jumping to conclusions, even as sound as much of his scientific work is.
Hawking's opinion
about heaven is just that, an opinion.
How
about Stephen
Hawking, Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Clemens, Noam Chomsky...
Last week, physicist Stephen
Hawking died at 76, but already, false reports are being spread
about his death.
Hawking may be smart, but I roll my eyes at his comment
about Heaven.
In
Hawking's comment
about how people there is no afterlife for broken down computer parts comment, how does he explain what people see when they have a near death experience?
Johny, and Mr.
Hawking —
About 25 years ago Time Magazine ran articles about religion and the general concensus was, «If GOD did not exist, people would create one to explain the mysteries none of us understand&ra
About 25 years ago Time Magazine ran articles
about religion and the general concensus was, «If GOD did not exist, people would create one to explain the mysteries none of us understand&ra
about religion and the general concensus was, «If GOD did not exist, people would create one to explain the mysteries none of us understand».
My scientific colleagues in Oxford and London are puzzled by
Hawking's bold declarations
about God, mainly because they are such speculative interpretations of what is already a very speculative theory.
Hawking knows no more
about the subject than anyone else.
First of all, I can't imagine why anyone would be interested in what Stephen
Hawking thinks
about Heaven.
@just sayin, How
about atheists like the members of Pink Floyd, Eddie Vedder, Arthur C. Clark, H.G. Wells, George Orwell, Ayn Rand, George Clooney, Carl Sagan, Stephen
Hawking, Stanley Kubrick, Kevin Bacon and Richard Feynman...
How
about the arrogance of this mortal creature Stephen
Hawking!
Dr.
Hawking would agree with everything I said
about what modern astrophysicists believe happened in the first few milliseconds of the big bang.
Stephen
Hawking for instance, actually tried honestly to put that in logical terms and failed, but he's sincere in it and know what he's talking
about.
From the article, talking
about the UK — «In fact, the country is one of the less religious ones in Europe, home to vociferous critics of religion like Richard Dawkins, and those who find belief in a higher power simply unnecessary, like Stephen
Hawking.»
I have read a lot of
Hawking, but that's not what I'm talking
about.
Ahh, also
Hawking knows a LOT more
about physics than you do, or I do, and when YOU get to be the Lucasian Professor, then you can say he's a joke.
One might also say that if the story is
about science, like Stephen
Hawking's theories, then folks shouldn't post religious comments either, but try stopping them!
Like Richard Dawkins, Stephen
Hawking, Leonard Mlodinow, and Peter Atkins, Krauss evidently thinks that actually knowing something
about philosophy and theology is no prerequisite for pontificating on these subjects.
I think by you praying for Mr.
Hawking is more for your benefit than his — because he could care less
about Jesus, or the interpretations that Man / people / humans made of flesh have made
about him.
I don't bother
about Stephen
Hawking.
Hawking warns
about contacting other life forms.
Hawking now is left to wax on and on
about spiritual matters, an area that he is largely unqualified to talk
about.
With all respect to comments of views on Larry King to Interview Stephen
Hawking about the form of God??
Dr.
Hawking's position
about gravity creating everything is a theory, and not a law.
Stephen
Hawking's recently published a book
about God not creating the Universe based on the fact that time as we know it did not exist before the big bang.