Sentences with phrase «about heat»

True story: the heroes of AGW Theory (the idea that humans caused global warming by releasing carbon dioxide into the air) had a very poor grasp of the facts about the heat carrying capacity of Earth's oceans.

That resulted in conclusions about the heat transfer from equator to the poles.

British thermal unit, the amount of heat required to raise one pound of water (about a pint) one degree Fahrenheit in temperature — about the heat content of one wooden kitchen match.

When it comes to heat distribution, a BtuBritish thermal unit, the amount of heat required to raise one pound of water (about a pint) one degree Fahrenheit in temperature — about the heat content of one wooden kitchen match.

We don't have to worry about that heat anymore?

> Gates is trying to construct some kind of narrative about the heat not diffusing but somehow being buried in small hot pockets of water thousands of meters below the surface.

Thus, we'd be very cautious about making an essentially linear, deterministic argument about heat extremes to the public.

(Note the absence of depth profile temperature information, which would tell you something about the heat content of the oceans).

If anyone knows how to make this calculation it should be someone at realclimate, but barring that, they certainly know about that heat engine of nature.

Summer popsicles and strangers to commiserate with about the heat 15.

Perhaps it is your view that your articles comments about HEAT and T ^ 4 should not be taken seriously.

These stations are scattered around Australia, all are at sea level and are said to be isolated from Urban Heat Influence - although the satellite images below suggest that questions might be asked about heat from nearby industrial and urban development, dependent upon prevailing winds.

But given that I work in heating and air conditioning, what I know about heat and the laws of thermodynamics, the new theory just doesn't sound right to me.

It's not about heat capacity as such.

=============================================== On Spitzbergen it was as warm 70 years ago as it is today By Dr. Sebastian Lüning and Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt (German text translated by P Gosselin) Newspapers like to write about heat and melt records in the Arctic, which supposedly had never happened before.

So, if you are concerned about heat death understand that it is a LOCAL problem, solvable by LOCAL MEASURES, and the problem is not getting worse.

What you say about heat transport by evaporation, condensation and convection is true.

According to those who have studied the issue, each BTUBritish thermal unit, the amount of heat required to raise one pound of water (about a pint) one degree Fahrenheit in temperature — about the heat content of one wooden kitchen match.

«It's not just about the heat, or the number of people.

(134) Other chances to mention global climate change came in stories about heat waves, floods, and coastal storms, especially when the events were more damaging than anything in recent memory.

Now the question is whether my ideas about heat transfer as vibrational are backward.

Plus, that paper is about heat / cold wave frequency, not trends in freeze - up or spring thaw dates.

So why do we only ever hear about the heat retaining properties of the atmosphere when the true cause of the Earth having the atmospheric temperature it has is not the atmosphere at all but the oceans?

I know much less about heat transport below 700m, but I think its caused mainly by large scale scale circulation and Ekman transport much more than downward diffusion.

Is there anything to say about the heat engines out there?

It means worrying about water security for people and farms, and about heat waves and mosquito - borne diseases.

So we have the formula: some partial knowledge (about the heat absorbing of CO2) is believed, and presented as complete knowledge of the climate system.

dude, what about that heat wave — must be global warming!»

I see a lot of people talking about heat and temperature as if they're the same thing here, then basing their arguments on that false premise.

Turgid undergraduate books about heat transfer in university libraries all write that radiation emitted by a colder body is absorbed by a hotter body.

The uhü is heated and cooled with a single - head Mitsubishi Hyper - Heat ductless minisplit with a rated capacity of 18,000 BtuBritish thermal unit, the amount of heat required to raise one pound of water (about a pint) one degree Fahrenheit in temperature — about the heat content of one wooden kitchen match.

Notice that it was not about heat in the system until the temperature started levelling off.

I don't know about heat sloshed under the poles but I need a slosh of scotch heat after this; since you know Bob well you will know he has discussed a reemergence mechanism to explain how the ocean can put heat into the atmosphere in an El Nino year yet keep warming itself; and despite the fact that the oceans are a complex eddying mess the fact remains that AGW is a top down heater; if the oceans were going to be heated by AGW a shallow ocean would be heating; but it ain't:

In the latter case it is about heat transfer and the way climate science has bungled the thermodynamics, in the former it is not about the radiative greenhouse effect as that is not about reflection.

plazaeme, here at 19 ° South 146 ° East, we know about heat.

just like the diffusive case, and there is no «build up» from «back radiation» or «back diffusion» that will make the source hotter, and this simply and directly violates everything we know about heat flow and thermodynamics.

But what about heat capacity over the full ocean depth?

So what does the 0 - dimensional energy - balance model predict about heat - waves in Australia, the decay of Arctic sea ice and Amazonian precipitation?

And once again you are talking confused nonsense about heat flowing in only one direction.

You certainly sound like a sky dragon here with your use of the magic word «thermodynamical» and statements about heat only flowing in one direction.

I contacted the WMO just last week about these heat pulses or bursts.

Here's the real story: On Nov. 7, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., issued a summary of the study about the heat source under West Antarctica.

Are studies done about the heat sink effect all of mans roads and buildings are having.

The one thing I will say: with model this simple, you can't worry about the heat on opposite sides of the planet (day / night).

But Greenhouse Theory could agree about heat capability [and latent heat absorbed] of water being able suck the heat of the Venus atmosphere, but would contend that this was only a temporary effect and that temperatures of Venus would roar back.

Recently there have been some widespread misconceptions about heat accumulation in the oceans, particularly in the deeper layers below 700 meters.

Remember that in a recent article «All About Dehumidifiers», there was a lament about the heat load added by all other dehumidifiers.

It is all about the heat transfer.

When we are at the upper bound of temperatures and worrying about heat, CO2 doesn't help.

Readers might be interested in this bit of analysis about heat generation in the climate models: