You've probably already heard
about high mercury levels in some types of fish, and even PCB's in some fish too.
Not exact matches
But when I got to the part
about the benefits of eating tuna, a quick google search bombarded me with warnings of their
high mercury levels.
While most urine samples collected from
about 200 people in Huepetuhe last year showed
mercury levels below the World Health Organization limit for occupational exposure, a few were extremely
high, according to Dr. Jonh Astete, who coordinated the study by Peru's National Institute of Health.
I would try and limit it to
about two cans of the tuna per week and yes, there are
higher levels of
mercury in some forms of tuna.
The journal Environmental Health published a research article that says this
about the testing of samples of HFCS: «The samples were found to contain
levels of
mercury ranging from below a detection limit of 0.005 to 0.570 micrograms
mercury per gram of
high fructose corn syrup.
Is there any convincing evidence or analysis you see that says this is in any way
about climate, particular, as distinct from the noted issues with
mercury in rice and
high smog
levels and the like?