Sentences with phrase «about his playing style»

But my main concern is about playing style and attitude.

I don't even want to talk about his playing style or anything.

#Pjaca: «The coach has told me a lot about his playing style and I liked that.

There is a mantle for just about every play style, and as your strategies change depending on a monster's weaknesses, so will your mantle, which is why it's ideal to collect them all.

Watching the puppies, you will learn about play styles, appropriate play, and dog body language.

There may be something about his play style or general demeanor, for example, that rubs other dogs the wrong way — rather than being just an issue of still having his «boys.»

Available in a variety of shapes and sizes that suit just about any play style, these dog treat puzzles and toys offer extra incentive for your pet to keep playing, thanks to their carefully constructed confection collection compartments.

And with a growing cast of now 27 heroes to choose from, there's a character to fit just about any play style.

Choosing the Witcher 3 best armor and weapons in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is all about a playing style.

Not exact matches

While there have been questions about Kaepernick's ability as a quarterback or his fit with certain teams due to his specific playing style, Reid has been considered one of the better safeties in the NFL.

To kick off our recent workation, we played a lighthearted Jeopardy - style game testing fun trivia about our company and teammates.

To the Third World ambivalence about missionaries, they respond either by playing down the role of missionaries or by trying to move from «old style» (evangelistic) to «new style» (social change or institutional support) missionaries.

Certainly one of the reasons for the neglect of both thinkers among English language philosophers has been that they have not played the role which Russell and Wittgenstein did in generating so - called analytical philosophy (a philosophical style inimical, upon the whole, to attempts to theorize about the nature of the universe in general.

The only potential downside about Lukaku is would we need to alter our style of play to get the best out of him?

; You see Klopp, Gardiola, every managers add that plus to the team; energy and keep them focused, a real driving force all game long., forget about Zidane, the all real plays as he used to almost, a real style..

An injury to Toby Alderweireld means Dier is set for a run in Tottenham's defence, while Southgate's comments about his intended style of play suggest he may fancy the Spurs man at the back.

Per is very slow, I wish he was faster atimes but ppl under rate him a lot and please football is not all about pace; Per plays with his brains and we tend to applaud players who play with more aggression unfortunately he doesn't; I will use an eg, if it was Per marking Hazard instead of Koscielny in d build up to the chelsea penalty, he would have probably gone backwards trying to stay on d right side of hazard so he doesn't shoot and narrowing d angle so that our goalie easily picks up d ball, that's how Per plays and to me that's subtle but intelligent option in that scenario but that style of play doesn't get plenty credit.

On top of that, there's plenty to criticise about the style of play at United under Mourinho, with fans not a great deal more entertained than they were in those dour days under Louis van Gaal.

Mainly because there has been so much talk from fans and media about him changing his style of play to fit what the Wizards are doing now.

Its not about d personnel in midfield, but d playing style of d coaches.

Wilshere himself has been talking about his injury record and although there is good news in that his problems have not been muscular or anything to do with his own physical issues, he admitted that his style of play is partly responsible and what's more there is nothing he can do or is willing to do to change it.

As reported by Metro the prolific striker had those same doubts about whether his style of play would be at odds with the way Arsenal play.

This group is all about having confidence and forcing their style of play on the opposition.

The striker admitted that he didn't know very much about Norwich but that the most important thing for him when considering a new club is the sides style of play.

«Rick and I were talking about how he needed some shock troops who could play his up - tempo, defensive style,» says Wallace.

There has been much said about the way that Guardiola is trying to change the style of the team to play his way, and Nolito thinks there is still room for improvement.

We believe this is about a philosophy that is not just about the style of play, but the whole ethos that surrounds the Club.

«I don't know if my playing style would suit the Premier League, and I haven't thought about my future yet.

The MOST frustrating / infuriating thing about AW, is that many of his ideas ARE still on the cutting edge regarding playing style, tactics, roles etc, however he seems to constantly shoot himself in the foot with his application / execution as he wants to achieve the outcomes HIS way.

Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!

Now thinking about the style that won arsenal trophies we had physical / technical midfielders and we had wide players who could play the forward role easily who were also equipped with pace and technical ability.

«I've spoken to plenty of players who have played under him at Arsenal over the years and every single one has only good things to say about his management and coaching style.

Giroud reminds me a bit of Dimitar Berbatov, as a matter of fact I am wholeheartedly convinced Giroud is Berbatov in disguise, because he is the only striker I have witnessed who can go more than two months without a goal and finish amongst the top 3 strikers in the Premier League, completely similar in style, both very classy finishers, brilliant hold up play they are also both lazy as hell and occasionally turn up in random clusters of games which 80 percent of the time are worthless in the hopes of winning any silverware, but do just about enough to convince you that they are better than they are.

Mexico didn't experiment, and that's fine - Miguel Herrera has talked about wanting his team to be more versatile, but they played the same formation and style as they always have under him tonight.

So please make up your mind about the style we want to play, do not blame the player.

Not too much is known about his style of play, but given the stage that he is at in his professional career and the club that he plays for, I'd imagine that Wenger is eyeing up this guy on the cheap.

The Fitzgerald Field House used to be where the Pitt men's and women's basketball teams played (and where Jerome Lane pulled his infamous Darryl Dawkins - style backboard shattering dunk in 1988 against Providence), but about a decade ago the hoopsters moved down the street to the $ 120 million Petersen Events Center.

What is one of the most obvious thing you notice about the style of play.

Maybe they like they like the way he looks; personally all I care about is how effective a player is for us in the style that we play.

However, I am open to idea's about a new manger with a different playing style and probably new philosophy and ideas.

OG is a Bergkamp style CF, just a very very very very poor version... Think I might of missed out a few million «very» to represent a realistic comparison... Back in those days we played a «442» formation but Bergkamp always dropped deep to collect the ball, in some ways he made the ACM come about due to his intelligence and ability.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Its not the first team that im worried about but its what is on the bench that scares me.Are those guys as reliable.Are they pushing for their first team positions?Do we have enough goalscorers do we have strength in our team to win midfield battles and penetrate defences.Does our style of play suit both the starters and the benchwarmers?These are the questions i sm trying to figure out.

Honestly, think about it, after all these years, of wenger sticking to his stubborn ways and belief's, Wouldn't a change in his style of play, contradict his last decade of work?

Wilson - > Honestly haven't watched him to say anything regarding his style of play, but we're talking about a Championship player here, I'd reserve judgement until he has proved his worth in the PL.

As for Morata, he has said that the football played in England would suit his style of play, although Benzema made a joke about the interest in his signature from Arsenal last summer, which should rule him out.

They just played their style of ball and did what they'd done to just about everyone all year.

I didn't hear too many complaining about our style of play when we won the double in 1970 - 71 with our 1 - 0 to The Arsenal side!!

Lacazette, Reus, Dybala — As long as he is top - quality, I am not really concerned about who exactly this new player should be, as I trust that Wenger will only recruit a player that fits into the team's new - found style of play.

We need some midfielders that can be strong and battle for us!!!! al our midfield are forward thinking and there is such a big hole from them and the back 4, It does not matter who we have playing at the back we will always get attacked with goals against us with the style of midfielders we have, Let get some steel in the middle of the park, Lets bring in some players that other teams feel fear playing against us, Look back at our best teams and we have always had players that will get back and cover and can tackle and win balls in the middle of the park, So many of our midfield now can, t even get back never mind win the ball back when we need it, It is NOT about the price of players it is all about buying players that can balance a good strong team, At time we need to buy a player who is not a star but is good at doing what we need him to do,