Sentences with phrase «about human science»
Ultimately the truth about this human science goes deeper.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/ Not exact matches
«It's a show about curiosity and uncovering the unexplored, blurry [lines] between science, philosophy, and human experience.»
«You've got statistics, accounting, management science, operational research, but you're not talking about humans,» says Burke.
According to the synopsis about the show, «Using science and storytelling, Hidden Brain reveals the unconscious patterns that drive human behavior.
At the time, O'Connell was working on a poster for a science - fiction and horror film festival featuring John Carpenter's 1988 cult classic «They Live» about aliens living incognito among humans.
How I Did it,» about how he became the man behind companies making science fiction come true: the X Prize Foundation, Singularity University, Human Longevity Inc..
While we can't use sterile mice to make any definitive conclusions about humans, the twins study, published in the journal Science last year, provided clear evidence that the microbiome is involved in weight gain — something earlier research had only suggested.
Dan is a Los Angeles - based musician, writer, and veteran passionate about science and technology, current events, human rights, economic impacts, and strategic calculus.
Excuse me if I prefer God who cares about me & answers me when human science fails me.
You just have to take the time to think about it long enough to see that these ancient written texts were written by humans with less knowledge about science than we have now.
I've been able to accommodate faith and science, at least to a degree by Paul's words about our flawed human understanding and seeing through a glass darkly..
If you're interested in self - inquiry there are a lot of psychological texts written in recent years when the science was far, far in advance of anything understood about humans back in biblical times.
Science is the only truth, and if we truly care about human survival, Fact not Novels should be what guide our decision making.
Start with the science that shows the humanity and individuality of the embryo, and then make philosophical arguments about the equality of all human beings as persons possessing inherent dignity.
People science is about searching for answers to questions humans ask.
As Catholics, we are allowed to know the truth about human nature - and to rejoice in the fact that medical science is revealing more and more to us about it all the time.
As described in my article on The Judeo - Christian Origin of Science» [1], science is based on specific fundamental beliefs about the natural world, namely that matter is good, rational and contingent and open to the human mind, and that any discoveries that may be made should be shared Science» [1], science is based on specific fundamental beliefs about the natural world, namely that matter is good, rational and contingent and open to the human mind, and that any discoveries that may be made should be shared science is based on specific fundamental beliefs about the natural world, namely that matter is good, rational and contingent and open to the human mind, and that any discoveries that may be made should be shared freely.
We, and our students, have written not only about God but also about the problem of evil, Christ, the church, Christian education, pastoral counseling, preaching, the nature of human beings, history, liberation and salvation, spirituality, religious diversity, interfaith dialogue, science and religion, and other standard theological topics.
These matters include God, Jesus, the church, creation, salvation, and so forth, but they also include questions about how these beliefs are related to the human and natural sciences.
The remainder of this chapter will be concerned with three other kinds of human relations — economic, political, and familial — and with what the sciences centrally concerned with them tell about human nature and its transformations.
Humanity has always observed new things, which has led to new understanding about the Earth, the Bible, science, God, the human body and the Church.
And back then, wasn't it the fans wrapped up in «theories» who were ultimately disappointed when they found out that Lost wasn't really concerned with answering the thousands of questions it had raised — that it was less a heady show about theology and science and more an emotional show about its characters and the human experience?
Otherwise, humans utilize science, logic and reason to improve their lives, bring about justice and peace.
Though much of today's science is applied science — the: discovery of new processes and the making of new products to satisfy human wants — it all rests on the desire to find out with certainty what can be known about the world of nature.
A recent editorial in a Christian Science periodical proclaims that «healing, after all, is the name for how God is known and expressed in human experience» (A. W. Phinney, «What do you think about Christian healing?»
I hope I would remember to turn sincerely and expectantly to God for guidance as to how to do more — intelligently — to meet the immediate human needs of the multitude, but to take practical inspired steps for healing the fears, hates, misunderstanding, and cruelties that bring suffering to humanity» («Some Questions and Answers about Christian Science,» Christian Science Sentinel, September 2, 1985, pp. 1508 - 09).
And what about the hope and optimism still embodied in the areas of human creativity — science and its attendant technologies?
With less panache, but with equal force and even further empirical social science evidence, her method resembles Roland Barthes» Mythologies in its outlines of the deep structure of the contemporary beliefs and practices surrounding our most deeply held moral codes about human sexual desire — or should I say eros.
about science, the quran toled 1440 years ago how the earth is formed, and also it told us how human is formed.
Just as physics reveals little of significance about man until one reflects on the enterprises of science and technology, so scientific psychology, aiming to out - do physics in objective rigor, can yield little insight about man until the distinctive human quality of self - awareness is acknowledged as an essential factor in psychological inquiry.
The following video talks about the science behind how humans experience morality.
Instead, it's about the human tendency to forget what Chesterton called the «sharp distinction between the science of mental relations... and the science of physical facts.»
Cloning, anti-aging technology, human / mechanical intertwining, basic discoveries of science pushing god further into a gap, resource scarcity, will all make for some very interesting conversations about population control, pregnancy and abortion in the coming centuries.
That testing includes a continuing attention to whatever the special sciences tell us about the conditions and the character of human motivations.
Noted Neuro - Buddhist Sam Harris has this to say about the President's choice to head the NIH: Dr. Collins has written that «science offers no answers to the most pressing questions of human existence» and that «the claims of atheistic materialism must be steadfastly....
Just as studying an artist's painting or an architect's building tells us much about the human author, so too does the study of the natural sciences lead us to understand the Author.
Some philosophers and scientists have claimed that empirical science could only develop where there was nothing sacred about the earth, leaving humans free to experiment with it.
What gets me about these people is they like to challenge science with the question - «Did humans just appear out of nowhere?»
If we use Gould to interpret Catholic teaching we are bound to be dualistic not just about science and religion but also about body and spirit, as if God somewhat arbitrarily glues a spiritual soul onto the physical human body.
And there is another thing: I think it's presuming on human weakness to suppose that the metaphysician will just operate and forget about science.
Armed with science, sociology and pluralistic awareness, liberals sometimes seem to offer rational reasons why evangelicals should take less seriously their talk about God's self - revelation on behalf of a lost human world.
Read this the other day what is GOOD about $ $ $ $ $ $ $ & SCIENCE is it is the TRUTH if you want to BELIEVE it or NOT From Fish to Human: Research Reveals How Fins Became Legs http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121210124521.htm
Inasmuch as congregations are themselves social spaces with social forms, theological schooling focused through questions about them must attend critically to the scripture whose use creates the social space; and it must attend to the disciplines of the human sciences that provide understanding of the social forms that make congregations moral and political realities in their own right.
As more and more facts about our world were discovered (ie, the world is more than 6000 years old, humans were not the first species, there was no world - wide flood), science and religion have grown further and further apart.
Such a «social constructionist» conception of science might seem as menacing to Hawking as it would to Wordsworth, both of whom need to believe that, whatever ontological affinities must be conceded, the distinction between daffodils and stinkweeds is grounded not only in the human intuition about the world but in the nature of things.
All the science that human knowledge has reached about the creation of the universe, heavens and Earth is nothing but a drop of water out of an oceans of knowledge that human science yet not has yet reached!!
So tell me again about how accurate your science claims / beliefs are and how foolish mine are when you (science) reject something as impossible that humans have proven to be possible.
Brand also asked about the seeming divide between science and religion, to which McGrath replied: «For me, science is great but it doesn't help us find that extra dimension - there's something special about human beings, we don't want to just know how things work but what they mean».
... Since man enjoys the capacity for a free personal choice in truth... the right to religious freedom should be viewed as innate to the fundamental dignity of every human person... all people are «impelled by nature and also bound by our moral obligation to seek the truth, especially religious truth» (Second Vatican Council, Dignitatis Humanae, 2)... let me express my sincere hope that your expertise in the fields of law, political science, sociology and economics will converge in these days to bring about fresh insights on this important question andthus bear much fruit now and into the future.
They are seeking what has been called post-modern paradigms for «an open secular democratic culture» within the framework of a public philosophy (Walter Lippman) or Civil Religion (Robert Bellah) or a new genuine realistic humanism or at least a body of insights about the nature of being and becoming human, evolved through dialogue among renascent religions, secularist ideologies including the philosophies of the tragic dimension of existence and disciplines of social and human sciences which have opened themselves to each other in the context of their common sense of historical responsibility and common human destiny.