Do we represent a wisdom tradition for the modern age — with something important to say
about human suffering and human flourishing — or are we orthopedic surgeons of the psyche?
Leaving concern
about human suffering aside, we Europeans have a very direct interest that the Belt becomes a region with at least somewhat stable states.
Eye - opening if you actually care
about human suffering.
Ophuis is confronting the public with paintings
about human suffering, from Nazi brutality to the Srebrenica massacre and crimes in Iraq.
-- a serious, socially responsible film
about human suffering.
«It» also seems to care very little about or unable to do anything
about human suffering or cruelty.
How many Christians, I wonder, are aware that in the Book of Job there is much discussion about God and
about human suffering and wickedness but not a whisper about heaven or hell, or anything of the kind?
The well - known advocate of atheistic humanism, Corliss Lamont, was quick to argue that Whitehead's use of «God» in «nonsupernaturalistic ways» was both deceptive and incomprehensible.4 And Max Otto raged at the audacity of Whitehead's attempt to do metaphysics at a time when «the millions» are concerned
about human suffering and need a restructuring of society.5
Wow... if anyone is happy
about the human suffering that will take place, THEY are a monster.
People do not care enough
about human suffering to turn from their rebellion against God and from their sins and turn back to God.
Then you might understand that Christian god as described in the bible is not loving, doesn't give a hoot
about human suffering, and in fact does not exist.
Not exact matches
The common image of Calvinism — and I hear it portrayed in this way often, even by people who know some things
about theology — is that the religion of John Calvin is a mean - spirited, narrow - minded perspective where a nasty God decides to save a few people while arbitrarily consigning the vast portion of the
human race to eternal
suffering.
I
suffered a terrible car accident... during 3 weeks I almost died «many times»... Now I can read a beautiful article like this one and agree with it... Believe me... no matter your faith, your fortune or whatever you may be involved with... on the face of death if you are
human you will only care
about your loved ones... you will remember
about the moments you were happy together and dream they happen again... you will remember your childhood like you were 7 again... you will ask forgiveness and try to show your love, no matter how hard you are... In the face of death we realize that nothing more then our family matters... For the professor, once his life of arrogance reaches an end, he will then understand what is the meaning of family...
How
about to improve life on this planet and reduce as much
human suffering as possible?
We can be very defensive
about the stupidest of things while ignoring the real issues of the world (I.e.
Human suffering).
And it's hard enough to cope with
human suffering without worrying
about the
suffering of other animals.
I've written
about some of my experiences before — meeting a six - year - old forced to memorize and recite the Westminster Confession at dinnertime, nearly losing my faith over the notion that God created the majority of the
human population for no other purpose but to
suffer in hell for eternity, and encountering the famed «Jonathan Edwards is My Homeboy» T - shirt in the midst of the so - called «Calvinist resurgence.»
Just this: that, far from being unconcerned
about the
human plight, the Church Fathers were motivated by their theology of salvation in upholding doctrines of divine immutability and impassibility (God's transcendence of
human suffering and passions).
Although we are quite in the dark
about the why of
human disease and
suffering, ordinary observation can show us that the result of their occurrence is by no means necessarily evil.
When we enter the tomb of
suffering, we have
about as much control over the logistics as when we hit the car brakes on black - ice — and if there's anything
human nature craves, it's control.
Even if this made any sense, there would be plenty of better eays to get across a message
about who is in contol (like creating
humans who already understand that) without making a world in which people
suffer now and can be sent into eternal punish, ent.
I hope I would remember to turn sincerely and expectantly to God for guidance as to how to do more — intelligently — to meet the immediate
human needs of the multitude, but to take practical inspired steps for healing the fears, hates, misunderstanding, and cruelties that bring
suffering to humanity» («Some Questions and Answers
about Christian Science,» Christian Science Sentinel, September 2, 1985, pp. 1508 - 09).
Way to many
humans have
suffered and died because they have been told
about some boggy man in the sky.
It is in
suffering that the whole
human question
about God arises; for incomprehensible
suffering calls the God of men and women in question.
Is it little wonder that the response in U.S. churches to global
suffering is superficial when the theological tradition of those churches has emphasized
human incapacity to do anything
about the
human condition?
As long as we cling to our own categories we can not hear the voices of our tradition that speak
about the importance of poverty and silence, that talk
about the benefits of unjust
suffering, that understand self - knowledge in terms of internal bondage, that depict
human struggle in terms of solitude and self - abnegation, that speak of freedom in terms of self - denial and asceticism, and that perceive wisdom in terms of detachment and transcendence.
After a time, however, some Jews began to speak
about resurrection of the body, which to them meant the entire
human personality; they did this because it was inconceivable that Jews who
suffered death as martyrs in the time of the Maccabees should be «cast as rubbish to the void,» their faithfulness to Judaism unrewarded and their bravery denied enduring value.
New Age spirituality isn't really my cup of tea, and ever since I visited India I've been a bit skeptical
about Eastern religions, as they seem to perpetuate a cultural indifference toward
human suffering.
I think that the references to hell are talking
about the practice that was once used of sacrificing
humans by burning them, and if we were evil we might
suffer the same fate as those
human sacrifices
Human beings all
suffer temptation; all sin; all lie
about it.
The argument from
suffering reaches beyond medicine's responsibility and competence; it extends into metaphysical questions
about the nature of
human happiness and what constitutes a meaningful life.
Systemic
suffering and social malfunctioning, therefore, are caused by
human greed, self - centeredness, an illusion
about power and control, racism, sexism, imperialism, ethnocentrism, and other factors.
A review of a book
about the mystery of
human suffering, especially as it relates to Christ's
suffering.
So if the catholic church was really serious
about relieving
human suffering they would promote family planning an help people have smaller families.
So where are the
human rights they tell us
about's when many
suffer because of those in this world... it is only for those cases you see people become as good as the «Three Wise Monkeys»...?!
In the first place such education, now as always, is concerned with the nurture of men and women whose business in life it will be to help men to see their immediate perplexities, joys and
sufferings in the light of an ultimate meaning, to live as citizens of the inclusive society of being, and to relate their present choices to first and last decisions made
about them in the totality of
human history by Sovereign Power.
We should try to cure all those who are
suffering from this Syndrome which affects
about 30 % of the
human race.
Historically and theologically we are dealing here with devout yet aberrant forms of faith that are unable to illuminate the more profound problems of
human existence,
suffering, guilt and destiny or to answer questions
about human history in its wholeness.
Also the bible talks
about imperfect
humans tendency to struggle for dominance, and this results in wars, oppression, and
suffering.
They teach me so much
about the complexity of
human relationships — the beauty and the
suffering.
At the same time, a persistent reflection on this central image may be able to explain, to some extent at least, why Christian theology has arrived at so many dead - ends in its ruminations
about mystery, creation,
suffering, and
human freedom.
It is taken from something he says
about the relationship between
human suffering and human depravity in his essay «On Human Nature.&r
human suffering and
human depravity in his essay «On Human Nature.&r
human depravity in his essay «On
Human Nature.&r
Human Nature.»
The God of the Bible — the God of the Exodus, the God of the prophets, the God of Jesus — cares deeply
about suffering and thus is passionately against that which is the source of unnecessary
human social misery.
I bring the conversation up because it came to mind last week when I was reading
about a Christian ethicist so passionately committed to defending the (unmistakably) exceptional nature of
human beings that he thinks it necessary to forbid his children any sentimental solicitude for the
suffering of beasts, and to disabuse them of the least trace of the dangerous fantasy or pathetic fallacy that animals experience anything analogous to
human emotions, motives, or needs; they can not really, he insists, know anxiety, grief, regret, or disappointment, and so we should never allow them to divert our sympathies or ethical longings from their proper object.
It isn't
about human rituals but
about believing the Holy Messiah, Jesus Christ by name to the Christian community did bear the
sufferings for our sins, so that we, by repentance (turning away from our sins) and following in the teachings of the Messiah to become the «new man in him» can be forgiven, and given the great mercy and grace that we all need, in order to be saved, and not destroyed with all that is evil.
The document from the Equality and
Human Rights Commission follows the European Court of
Human Rights judgment in four cases
about religious rights in the workplace, one of which found that an employee
suffered a breach of her right to religious freedom for being told not to wear a cross at work.
The Leftovers is at its most interesting when it is a reflection on
human grief,
suffering and confusion
about the big questions, and when it causes us to ask of ourselves, what if...?
I'm a very
human pastor in a world of unbearable
suffering and I'm telling you
about it.
Doctrine are those
human lessons we've learned over time trying to live under Dogma, and are usually
about the mistakes made along the way (doctrine only develops by
human actions that caused additional
suffering that didn't need to happen - doctrine is
about teaching you NOT to do those things).
living a life of delusion is AWESOME until REALITY BIOTCH slaps you in the face and pops the sheltered bubble of the priveledged happy life you live and heaps misery onto you and your loved ones and all you can do / say / think is... god has a plan... yup a plan to make you
suffer for a reason you can't understand... from my VAST knowledge of the world and
human nature i know how to make choices that avoid MOST of the misery and
suffering the rest of you shlubs endure, can't avoid everything, but instead of wasting time with religious b and s i think
about avoiding misery and
suffering... 35 years and so far sooooooo goooood...