Ironically, the climate debate is
about humans causing climate change.
Most, (the vast majority BTW) sceptics I know aren't sceptical
about humans causing climate change at all.
Not exact matches
Looking ahead: The Environmental Protection Agency, under its new management, decided to issue new talking points to staffers instructing them to disperse doubt when talking
about human activity being a
cause of
climate change.
I really don't see what he gains from being indifferent and idiotic
about the issue, but for the mere fact he can't make up his mind whether
humans are a
cause behind global
climate changes makes me think this guy isn't fit to run the country.
Therefore, people who find # 1 absurd can determine whether or not we should do anything
about climate change by determining whether or not
humans are
causing it.
If you can then show that
humans don't
cause climate change, then only # 2 (and possibly # 4, which has the same conclusion) is left, and it means that we have no obligation to try and do anything
about it.
His session allowed him to talk
about how
human climate change in national parks is melting glaciers, raising sea level, killing trees, and
causing other impacts.
Those differences can be
caused by people intent on misleading the public, like the organized campaigns to create doubt
about the science pointing to
human -
caused climate change, she said.
Reality —
about 97 % of
climate experts have concluded that
human -
caused climate change is happening.
And President Obama told Vox in February that the media «sometimes overstates the level of alarm people should have
about terrorism» when compared with the
human suffering that will be
caused by
climate change (Greenwire, Feb. 11).
The highest number of respondents, 35 percent, said
climate change was
caused about equally by natural
changes in the environment and
human causes.
«We want to find ways to confront an erosion of evidence,» AAAS CEO and Science Executive Publisher Rush Holt told the fellows, referring to skepticism
about the reality of
human -
caused climate change, «and that's why we turned to you.»
It was suspected that a harsh drought from
about 2000 to 2010 that killed tens of thousands of livestock was unprecedented in the region's history and primarily the result of
human -
caused climate change.
The BBC team used clever analogies and appealing graphics to discuss three key numbers that help clarify important questions
about climate change: 0.85 degrees Celsius — how much the Earth has warmed since the 1880s; 95 % — how sure scientists are that
human activity is the major
cause of Earth's recent warming; and one trillion tons — the best estimate of the amount of carbon that can be burned before risking dangerous
climate change.
He said scientists need
about a century's worth of good data to start making sophisticated predictions
about the influence of
human -
caused climate change on hurricane frequency.
Associate professor of natural resource social science Linda Prokopy and fellow researchers surveyed 6,795 people in the agricultural sector in 2011 - 2012 to determine their beliefs
about climate change and whether variation in the
climate is triggered by
human activities, natural
causes or an equal combination of both.
Carolyn Gramling writes
about studies that, for the first time, blame specific extreme weather events on
human -
caused climate change — certain to be a hot topic in 2018.
«Of course not — and yet scientists have the same level of certainty
about human -
caused climate change as they do that cigarettes harm your health.»
Indeed, a recent Pew poll shows that there is a substantial and growing amount of public disagreement
about basic scientific facts, including
human evolution, the safety of vaccines and whether or not
human -
caused climate change is real and happening.
Moreover, we found that when respondents» perception of the level of scientific agreement increased, this led to significant
changes in other key beliefs
about the issue, such as the belief that
climate change is happening,
human -
caused and a worrisome problem.
When the weather is unseasonably hot or cold, Americans across the political spectrum have even stronger views
about whether
climate change caused by
human activity is a reality or not.
The consensus on
human -
caused climate change is among the strongest observed in the sciences —
about as strong as the consensus surrounding the link between smoking and lung cancer.
As for the long - running political controversy
about climate change, especially
about the degree to which
human activity
causes it, the scientists said it tends to become relevant mainly when they are dealing with long time frames — say 30 years or more — and mostly at the top echelons of the political hierarchy.
One of the senior scientists there (extremely conservative senior scientist who got after me occasionally
about being too bold), publicly used the phrase, «this [
human caused climate change evidence] is alarming to me.»
«The study participants were deeply divided along partisan lines, with
about 50 % saying they do believe in
human -
caused climate change and 50 % saying they don't,» said Dan Kahan, professor of law and of psychology at Yale Law School and the lead researcher on the study.
A «Parexit» would send a clear signal to the rest of the world: «The United States does not care
about the global problem of
human -
caused climate change.
According to one study that looked at eight fuel aridity metrics in the Western U.S. and modeled
climate change's effects on them,
human -
caused climate change accounted for
about 55 percent of the observed increases in fuel aridity between 1979 and 2015 (Figure 6), and added an estimated 4.2 million hectares of forest fire area between 1984 and 2015.7 Based on all eight metrics, the Western U.S. experienced an average of 9 additional days per year of high fire potential due to
climate change between 2000 and 2015, a 50 percent increase from the baseline of 17 days per year when looking back to 1979.
The focus of the debate on CO2 is not wholly predicated on its attribution to past forcing (since concern
about CO2 emissions was raised long before
human -
caused climate change had been clearly detected, let alone attributed), but on its potential for
causing large future growth in forcings.
I have wanted to learn more
about the effect of
human -
caused climate change on the natural world.
The National
Climate Assessment offers a wealth of actionable science about the causes, effects, risks and possible responses to human - caused climate
Climate Assessment offers a wealth of actionable science
about the
causes, effects, risks and possible responses to
human -
caused climate climate change.
Marine scientists who met in Monaco in October 2008 released a strong statement on January 30, 2009
about ocean acidification accelerating due to increasing carbon emissions
caused by
human - induced
climate change.
«[The next ice age is] not worth worrying
about compared to immediate concerns
about damaging
human -
caused climate change expected over the coming decades if no action is taken to mitigate this likelihood.»
As the graph below from Spracklen's News and Views article shows, the balance between warming (red shading) and cooling (blue shading) have kept the country's contribution to
human -
caused climate change pegged at
about 10 % in recent decades, despite soaring fossil fuel emissions.
I find it troubling that Wojick, a federal employee (DOE), is being paid to develop materials designed misinform and confuse school children
about human -
caused climate change.
Through many of those years, Taylor was a frequent spokesperson for those scientists who regularly challenged whether
climate change is real,
human -
caused, or, in either event, worth worrying
about or doing anything to address.
Perceptions of where the scientific community stands on
climate change have fluctuated from a low of 44 % in 2010 who said that scientists agree
about human activity as the main
cause of warming temperatures to a high of 57 % saying this today.19
But the annual amount of
human -
caused global emissions of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas driving
climate change, is now
about 50 percent larger than in 1992.
Students watched An Inconvenient Truth — former U.S. Vice President Al Gore's documentary
about global warming — and studied the science behind
climate change (including arguments that it is not a crisis
humans caused).
After a long controversy, Idaho science teachers will now be able to fully educate their students
about human -
caused climate change.
Though writers have long warned us
about what happens when
humans mess with nature in general and the weather in particular, We Are Unprepared might be in the vanguard of tales that deal with the consequences of
human -
caused climate change.
Senator John McCain used a visit to Vestas, a manufacturer of wind turbines in Portland, Ore., as a backdrop for a speech describing his views on
human -
caused climate change and what to do
about it.
We can argue
about how to deal with manmade
climate change and we can argue
about how bad the impacts will be but arguing
about whether there is global warming or whether
humans are
causing it is, quite frankly, absurd.
-- At the other extreme, CO2 growth exceeding exponential at 1.5 % / year would be inconsistent with historical trends and with the negative feedback
caused by
human concern
about climate change.
As I explained last winter in my Issues in Science and Technology essay, I've unlearned almost as many things as I've learned
about human -
caused climate change in more than a quarter century of reporting on the issue.
Mr. Will's overarching premise
about sea ice and messages it holds related to
human -
caused climate change, was wrong, they say.
From what data exists
about previous peroids of rapid
climate change (i.e.
climate change caused by an intrinsic mechanism such as a meteor impact, massive volcanic activity or
human activity, as opposed to sun cycles), it seems that
climate does show such behavior too.
Quite possibly the most important thing to communicate
about climate change is that there is a 97 % consensus amongst the scientific experts and scientific research that
humans are
causing global warming.
The letter portends to offer facts
about «
climate change deniers, but readers can't even get further than the first paragraph without running into an unsupportable talking point
about skeptic
climate scientists saying global warming «isn't happening / happening, but for natural reasons / happening and
caused by
humans, but it's not so bad.»
The fact that certain analytical conclusions
about observed
climate change, attribution to
human causes, in particular the energy system and deforestation, projected greater
climate change in the future, observed impacts of
climate change on natural and
human systems, and projected very disruptive consequences in the future given our current trajectory, is not due to «group think» but rather to a generally shared analysis based on evidence.
«Recent surveys of meteorologists have indicated that their belief or disbelief in
human cause trying
climate change is really an extension of the broader public misunderstanding, and that's a real problem because meteorologists are among the most trusted messengers of information
about climate change.»