Sentences with phrase «about ideal gas»

So let's talk about the gas — and let's make it a consistent gas, please, as the idea of an ideal gas without thermal conductivity makes as much real sense as talking about an ideal gas that doesn't satisfy the relation, right?

You are correct about the ideal gas law, but incorrect about no power going in or out.

Not exact matches

I agree CO2 is an independent variable — it is independently irrelevant to the thermodynamic processes involved — since you are interested in learning about actual science — study your ideal gas law, and get back to me for the next class!

Robert, again, as I posted above, Caballero in 2.17 is talking about the no gravity isotropic velocity field ideal gas he shows in Fig. 2.3.

... though idiotically given as proof is a typical non-experiment from the AGWSF department, by opening a bottle of scent in a classroom saying it proves the scent is spread by Brownian motion, that's when it's not being not being idiotically explained by using ideal gas properties of elastic collisions in empty space as if ideal gas, but more often than not, claiming both these processes happening at the same time — seemingly as unconcerned as Willis about context.

So when one talks about an adiabatic ideal gas — one where no internal heat transfer occurs via conduction — one is already talking bullshit, or rather, restricting your attentions to short enough times that thermal equilibrium hasn't been established.

If you want to prove that there is a non-GHG GE involving the dynamic motion of gases, play right on through, but realize that Jelbring's paper isn't about that and is incorrect because it ascribes the same effect to a completely static, completely dry ideal gas that has been left in place, isolated, for a billion years (or as long as equilibrium takes, which won't be anywhere near a billion years at a joule of conductive transport per meter of atmosphere per degree kelvin of temperature difference per 40 seconds).

doesn't alter the fact that none of you fixated on radiation in your empty space ideal gas atmosphere without any sound has absolutely anything relevant to say about the energy budget in the real world.

There is no internal consistency, no joined up logic in their imaginary ideal gas fisics so their claims about properties and processes contradict each other.