«There is a spirited discussion currently happening
about increasing the block size.
Not exact matches
Preston: [00:23:24] So I hope you guys enjoy the discussion with the discussion for the masterminds going to pick up talking
about this 2X upgrade that's
about to happen in November where they're trying to
increase the
block size even though this Segwit thing has already happened that it's already alleviated a lot of the pressure for the transactions being fit into the
block.
The proposed soft fork replaces Bitcoin's
block size limit with a
block «weight» limit, which offers an effective
block size limit
increase of
about 0.7 to 1.0 megabyte, depending on the types of transactions included in a
block.
If activated, SegWit offers a number of benefits, one of which is an effective
block size limit
increase to
about 1.6 to 2 megabytes, depending on the types of transactions included in
blocks.
The Bitcoin
block size debate
about how the Bitcoin network can support
increased transactions without compromising the original values of decentralization and democratic control, has dominated forums, chat rooms and social media for months now.
When asked
about an activation threshold for a hard fork, Ver seemed to distance himself from the idea of
increasing the
block size limit without a large amount of support signaled by miners on the network.
As the spirited debate
about the
block size increase and the best ways to switch continues, it is clear that there is a need to lead the important industry - wide discussion, bringing all involved parties together, opening the lines of communications, and providing the venue for all points of view to be heard.
After Corallo's post, Pieter Wuille, a Core developer since 2011 and co-founder of Blockstream, penned a response in support of
increasing the
block size, but wary
about using Andresen's proposed method and hard forks.
It is hard to remember a time when Bitcoin community wasn't arguing
about the
increase in
block size.
Even with
increases in
block size it was estimated that the blockchain capacity could only support
about 800 million users with micropayment channels due to the number of on - chain transactions required to open and close channels,» read the paper.
A new version 0.12.0 of the Bitcoin Core has been officially released amidst the ongoing debate
about the way to
increase the
size of bitcoin
block.
While many continue to argue
about the merits of hard forks versus small forks, the first significant
increase in
block size in quite some time is nearly ready to launch.
Further, Dash's new software rollout will also
increase the network's maximum
block size from 1Mb to 2Mb, allowing for
about 48 transactions to confirm every second, compared to Bitcoin's 7.
Many mining pools, even those that routinely complain
about the lack of a hard - forking
increase to the
block size limit, are now pushing marketing campaigns built around this new, growing source of revenue for hashers.
Questions have also been raised
about aspects of the governance system proposed for Bitcoin Classic, the introduction of two functioning blockchains that share years of transaction history and each with its own network of assets, and the exact degree of support from bitcoin miners for Bitcoin Classic versus a broader
block size increase, particularly those based in China.
The move to develop the technology finds Purse pitching its implementation - one that is today an alternative to versions by Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin Unlimited - as a third option in the scaling debate that would bring
about a
block size increase and malleability fix via soft fork, or a change that doesn't risk splitting the bitcoin blockchain.
Notably, in December 2015, the moderator Theymos rеmoved Armstrong's tweet
about Coinbase running Bitcoin XT «as an experiment,» provoking an outcry among the supporters of the
block size increase, who accused Theymos of blatant siding with Bitcoin Core.