I ask where are the independent opinions
about the industrial wind turbine agenda.
Not exact matches
Identifying that some people who have one or more acknowledged risk factors prior to
Industrial Wind Turbines beginning to operate provides information
about predictable health problems which may ensue with exposure to infrasound and low frequency noise.
A significant number of people, who live in proximity to
Industrial Wind Turbines, complain
about a variety of physical and emotional symptoms.
Industrial wind turbines and industrial wind development is not about «saving» the en
Industrial wind turbines and
industrial wind development is not about «saving» the en
industrial wind development is not
about «saving» the environment.
That problem — * exasperated sigh * — is this: if the RSPB is really concerned
about the potential disturbance to wildlife of a few noisy lorries and drill rigs (which, let's not forget, are only up for a short period, after which they are replaced by a silent extraction device called a Christmas tree), how come it's so cheerfully complacent
about the epic numbers of rare birds and protected bats which are sliced and diced (or, in the case of bats, barotraumatised — i.e. made to implode) by the
industrial wind turbines which the RSPB not only champions but from which it benefits financially.
First, Thursday April 13th saw a disclosure from the Energy Ministry that Ontario paid out $ 28,095,332 including
about $ 240,000 in interest to Windstream Energy to satisfy the award made to them under the NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) tribunal, due to cancellation of a 300 - MW offshore
industrial wind turbine project.
«With all the available evidence from around the world
about the effects of Low Frequency and Infrasound from
industrial wind turbines, it amazes me that the alarms are not sounding earlier and stronger.»
Last week an Ontario judge ruled that Dr. Arlene King, the province's chief medical officer of health, will have to testify
about the known noise and health risks of
industrial wind turbines.
Read the story
about Shawn and Trisha Drennan and their journey in their fight for the right to live in a safe neighborhoods without
industrial wind turbines that are proven to make humans sick.....
Ontario's Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change received thousands of formal complaints from people living near
industrial wind turbines, but did little
about it, a coalition of groups and individuals opposed to
wind farm development is charging.
«We will respect the views of rural constituents by giving their MPPs free votes»: If that was true, Liberal MPPs wouldn't be responding to furious complaints from their constituents
about having
industrial wind turbines rammed down their throats with form letters.
The ultimate kick in the pants is that worldwide, with
about 240,000
industrial wind turbines, we only receive less than half of one percent, net zero, of our power needs.
IF «Greens» (Al Gore et al) love nature, why aren't they more concerned
about carpeting pristine landscapes with
industrial wind turbines?
The fact that the Ontario government spent billions of dollars erecting
about 8,000
industrial wind turbines only made matters worse.
Annoyance levels may be expressed more
about wind turbines than for comparable
industrial noise, in particular when people hold pre-existing negative attitudes towards
turbines.
We have to pause here and take stock and take the time to think this through as a society... or we could end up with thousands of giant
industrial wind turbines over great swaths of prime agricultural land and beautiful countryside and we don't know enough
about what this could mean in terms of human health, agricultural land health, animal health, water table health, wildlife health, property value health, property tax health and so on.