On the heels of my last post
about iron fertilization of the ocean, I found another interesting paper on the topic.
But if you want to learn more
about iron fertilization, we and our colleagues at Discovery have written a lot about it:
Not exact matches
Kim Stanley Robinson's wildly successful 1993 science fiction trilogy
about geo - engineering and terraforming, Red Mars, Green Mars, Blue Mars, describes «the
fertilization of the Antarctic Ocean with
iron dust, which was to act as a dietary supplement to phytoplankton» as a cure for both global warming and dying coral reefs.
While many of the participants raised concerns
about the efficacy and safety of large - scale
iron fertilization, others seemed to acknowledge that the urgency of the climate crisis warranted the continuation of carefully designed experiments — pointing out that, if done appropriately, they could provide a win - win for both scientists and businesses interested in selling carbon offsets.
Most likely in response to the recent study published in Nature
about oceanic
iron fertilization, The Onion has an issue of American Voices
about it.
Reuters says that the ACE CRC report estimates that ocean
iron fertilization «would likely hit an absorption limit of
about 1 billion tonnes of carbon» or
about 15 % of total carbon emissions.
Those CDR techniques with the least potential: Biochar («significant doubts»
about scope, effectiveness and safety - «substantial research» required to prove effectiveness) and ocean
iron fertilization (not proven to be effective and «high potential for unintended and undesirable ecological side effects»).