Presumptive Consensual Dispute Resolution (CDR) assumes that families experiencing separation or divorce are mostly better served if the system encourages them to negotiate rather than fight
about issues in dispute between them.
In this case, the Court found that although it is clear that the mediator / arbitrator would have formed some tentative impressions or even conclusions
about the issues in dispute, «it was important that he remain open to persuasion and refrain from expressing strong views that might disclose a predisposition to decide one way or the other.»
Not exact matches
This
issue of trading being taught vs. it being a natural gift was first made popular by the famous experiment by Richard Dennis and Bill Eckhardt who had an ongoing
dispute in mid-1983
about whether traders were born or made.
The federal government and British Columbia Premier John Horgan, whose province produces
about half of Canada's softwood, have been pushing to resolve the
dispute before the start of NAFTA renegotiations rather than risk having the
issue sidelined or bogged down for months
in the broader trade talks.
It is not without interest that such dissenters are frequently most enthusiastic
about the Church taking official positions on innumerable
issues in political
dispute.
When he teaches
in a solemn way
about issues of faith or morality, especially when things are
in dispute, his teaching is guaranteed to be infallible.
Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious
dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the
issue or must
in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action
in behalf of his family
in the emergency; differences of opinion exist
in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?
The legal
dispute in court was
about two
issues: (1) whether or not it could be said that parliament had given its approval already, and (2) if it hadn't, did it need to.
Asked
about her Facebook posts on the
issue of abortion rights, which were surfaced by activists
in the district, Perez Williams did not
dispute their authenticity.
«We have long detected the dead hand of the Government interfering to stop us reaching negotiated settlements
in the current
disputes and it's
about time Chris Grayling stopped playing politics with passenger safety and started taking the
issue seriously.
To understand the shrill reaction of both Poland and Israel
in this
issue, one has to note that there is a long - time ongoing
dispute about the property of heirless Jews that was seized during Nazi occupation and Soviet control and currently is
in Polish possession.
They talked
about a number of
issues facing the territory, including the economic impact his people have on the state, the future of gaming
in New York, and the ongoing
dispute between the nation and state government over the collection of cigarette taxes.
On other
issues, Clegg found an ally
in then Foreign Secretary William Hague during «behind - the - scenes debates
about Israel and Palestine or the Middle East or China, where [Clegg] would customarily push for a harder line than the narrow realpolitik espoused by Osborne» (202), a poorly drafted sentence that makes it unclear whether Clegg's
dispute with Osborne ranged over all these
issues or solely China.
«It's definitely a bit of a contentious
issue — not just polite conversation,» says Scambos, who continues to worry
about the harm a
dispute like this can do
in a time when many science fields are increasingly subject to political polarization.
Regardless of the type of legal proceeding or which side uses scientific evidence, the forensic scientist must be able to write a report and testify under oath
about: what facts or items of evidence were analyzed or tested; what tests or analyses were used; how valid or reliable those tests or analyses have been found to be by other courts; why and how the forensic scientist was qualified to conduct those tests or analyses; and, what the results of the tests or analyses were and how those results are relevant to the
issues in dispute.
About Blog Recognised as a market leader
in medical negligence, we provide innovative and pragmatic solutions to liability claims,
disputes of all types and health law
issues generally.
Recording Devices
in Schools As cameras and other recording devices increasingly find their way into the public school classroom, legal
disputes about this
issue are also on the rise.
As we demonstrated
in our 2015 analysis of the Common Core debate on Twitter, the
dispute about the standards was largely a proxy war over other politically - charged
issues, including opposition to a federal role
in education, which many believe should be the domain of state and local education policy; a fear that the Common Core could become a gateway for access to data on children that might be used for exploitive purposes rather than to inform educational improvement; a source for the proliferation of testing which has come to oppressively dominate education; a way for business interests to exploit public education for private gain; or a belief that an emphasis on standards reform distracts from the deeper underlying causes of low educational performance, which include poverty and social inequity.
The consumer credit reporting agency is obligated to include your statement or a summary of your statement
about disputed information
in any report it
issues about you.
The 202 - page bill, the Comprehensive Consumer Credit Reporting Reform Act (H.R. 5282)-- sponsored by the House Financial Services Committee's ranking Democratic member, Rep. Maxine Waters (Calif.)-- covers a wide array of contentious
issues, including restricting the use of credit information
in most hiring decisions and shifting more of the burden of proof to creditors when they report negative items
about consumers who later
dispute them.
About Blog Recognised as a market leader
in medical negligence, we provide innovative and pragmatic solutions to liability claims,
disputes of all types and health law
issues generally.
On Skeptical Science you can learn more
about a
disputed issue in the climate debate.
(The fact that you are harping on an
issue about the CO2 / IR absorption window that is so settled that even Richard Lindzen does not
dispute it [i.e., Lindzen agrees that the forcing due to doubling CO2 is around 3.7 W / m ^ 2] gives me even more confidence
in my conclusion.)
Initially I will strictly adhere to this, i.e.
in answering my questions above this is
in regard to folks who overall are not deeply informed
about the
disputed issues.
«He said that public confidence
in climate science would be improved if there were more openness
about its uncertainties, even if that meant admitting that sceptics had been right on some hotly -
disputed issues.»
Despite some spirited claims
in comments
in part one
about how I'm «ignoring the central
issue», I don't
dispute that data is missing from many stations, I never have.
From the initial stages of marital separation, to longer - term
disputes related to
issues such as child custody or support payments, we answer the most frequently asked questions («FAQs») that we hear
about marital
disputes in Ontario, Canada.»
At the law firm of Breslin & Breslin, our trial attorneys advise and represent local businesses
about the best ways to resolve contract
disputes, employment or severance
issues, real estate
issues, and other matters that can come up
in the course of any company's business.
The below information discusses some of the most typical construction
disputes, and how professionals
in the industry go
about addressing these
issues.
Limoges appealed, arguing that that the court made an improper credibility assessment
about the affidavit of the Limoges expert and because the judge overlooked material
issues of fact that were
in dispute.
The majority of felony criminal cases are resolved
in the pre-trial phase of criminal proceedings through court appearances (conferences and hearings), waivers, motions (requesting court to resolve a
dispute about the evidence or charges between the defense and prosecution), discovery
issues, and plea bargains or negotiations.
What is clear is that parental alienation is a big
issue: CAFCASS estimates that around 80 % of the difficult
disputes about children
in court involve a child or children who are being subjected to parental alienation.
... It is impossible to see any justification for
issuing off - the - record opinions
in a
dispute about drawings of transmission testing equipment.»
[56] The court also quoted the view
in Perry that a committee «must not and can not decide
disputed issues of fact
in relation to the substantive allegations,» and «must also be extremely cautious
about rejecting or discounting evidence on the basis that it is incredible or implausible.»
Providing
in - house counsel to two upcoming companies: HotelPlanner and Meetings.com, Leticia speaks
about the
issues she deals with on a daily basis and how to avoid tarnishing relationships during money
disputes.
This can range from historical information
about judges and lawyers, notably including the cases
in which they have been involved and the decisions reached, to the different parties
in dispute, and even specialist IP
issues, such as patents.
Drafting a marital settlement agreement on your own instead of having an experienced qualified attorney draft it can result
in various costly legal
disputes after the divorce is over, such as a
dispute about an
issue that you and your spouse failed to address
in your agreement or a
dispute about an
issue that was addressed
in your agreement but is too vague or ambiguous to understand.
Valuation:
disputes and advice
about valuations or
in situations involving valuation
issues, including
in relation to properties, other investments, businesses, shareholdings, portfolio assets, pension funds, rent reviews, damages claims, asset disposals, and artworks.
It can now, e.g., assist you
in reporting harassment
in the workplace, or to make a complaint
about a landlord; or it can help you ask for more parental leave,
dispute nuisance calls, fight a fraudulent purchase on your credit card... The new DoNotPay covers consumer and workplace rights, and a host of other
issues.
There are
issues regarding the measures on how a
dispute is brought up; there can be fictitious claims and the way
in which a particular party goes
about and makes claims against a large company, as they know that the company will want to settle.
Although interested
in a diverse range of legal fields, Katie is enthusiastic
about advocating for the rights of others
in matters of discrimination, employment
issues, and wage and hour
disputes at The Erlich Law Office
The first flowchart takes users through the opening steps
in a family law case, including consideration of legal
issues, as well as making a separation agreement and thinking
about alternative
dispute resolution.
In both Marques v. Raulino and McCall v. Res, the courts addressed a number of main
issues between the parties, but each touched briefly on what is nonetheless an important question: The extent to which a Parenting Coordinator is entitled to resolve
disputes about legal custody, mobility, parenting schedules, or anything other than minor or temporary
issues.
Topics addressed
in the study include participants» views of and experiences with: court - attached family justice programs; hearing the views of children;
issues in custody and access
disputes;
issues in disputes about child support and spousal support; family violence; unified family courts; and, limited scope legal services
in family law
disputes.
This can range from historical information
about judges and lawyers, including the cases
in which they have been involved and the decisions reached, to the different parties
in dispute, and even specialist IP
issues, such as patents.
Her experience
in education and community care law means she is particularly well - suited to the numerous cases
in which these areas of the law collide, such as Tier 4 visa
issues, student loans, and
disputes about local authority and health authority obligations
in cases involving those with «precarious» immigration status.
In addition to this glimpse into the costs associated with these four
dispute resolution processes, the CRILF - CFCJ report also highlights several interesting findings
about lawyers» perceptions of the usefulness and suitability of collaboration, arbitration, mediation and litigation for complex
issues, cases involving children, and for cases that are high - or low - conflict.
I have noticed a real analysis of whether there are welfare
issues in parenting
disputes as opposed to arguments
about the division of parenting time.
This approach provides the individual with protections and places the burden on the parties to resolve their differences
about the appropriateness and scope of disclosure as part of the judicial or administrative procedure itself before the order is
issued, rather than requiring the covered entity to get involved
in evaluating the merits of the
dispute in order to determine whether or not the particular request is appropriate or too broad.
This case involved the appeal of three non-Charter cases
in Ontario where the Attorney General
disputed the amicus curiae rates as determined by the court, raising constitutional
issues about the relationship between the judiciary and the executive and legislative branches
in our society.