I was also able to learn
about issues of law and politics at an early age which shaped my desire to both teach and advocate.
Not exact matches
«I've been talking
about this
issue of off - duty conduct, and especially social media, for years now,» says Stuart Rudner, a founding partner at the
law firm Rudner MacDonald LLP that specializes in employment
law.
Free
law advice: A driver once told me a story
about how he had a high - priced lawyer in the back
of his car during a time when he was going through a legal
issue.
Law professor Eugene Volokh, who blogs
about free speech
issues at the Washington Post, has made the same point in the past to argue that Google's (GOOG) choice
of search results are a form
of free speech.
Among the things that prompted the creation
of the inquiries were: financial difficulties facing DB pension plans and related concerns
about DB funding rules; long simmering and unresolved legal
issues, the most prominent
of which revolve around the use
of surpluses in DB plans; ambiguity
about how EPP regulations apply to new hybrid plans; a lack
of harmonization among Canadian regulatory
laws; and declining coverage by EPPs in general and DB plans in particular.
So if a Republican senator mostly hears from GOP constituents, and these constituents are more likely to be really passionate
about the
issue since they are on the side that opposes stricter
laws, that's going to give the senator a skewed perception
of where voters are on this topic.
This isn't an
issue of law, it's
about risk vs. reward.
When I interviewed local community advocate Sean Sheppard last year
about Game Changer, his program that uses sporting events to bring members
of law enforcement and the community together to talk
about racism and other thorny
issues, we met at Starbucks.
That
about sums up the state
of U.S. token sales in the wake
of new dialogue on whether the mechanism, by which startups are
issuing custom cryptocurrencies to raise funds, is compliant with the
law.
Take, for instance, Florida's gun
laws: A new report from the Giffords
Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, a gun control nonprofit formerly known as the Legal Community Against Violence,
issued a report this month
about the astronomical economic cost
of Florida's awful gun violence
laws.
-- With the spotlight on him, the president's son - in -
law has become «paranoid,» CNN reports: «Kushner also feels that he has come under fire from his own West Wing colleagues recently, with the notion that «everyone is out to get him,» a source said... Kushner... told people that he suspected the timing
of the story
about his foreign contacts was coordinated to be released when
issues surrounding his security clearance were in the news, according to a source familiar with his thinking.»
It disclosed a whistleblowing mechanism for reporting violations to privacy - related
issues (G3), and published information
about the impact
of Russian
law on user privacy (G4).
But it is one thing to state that all human beings have some access to God's
law within and through human nature, quite another to expect natural
law theories based on reason alone to persuade others
about contested moral
issues in a context where such theories are stripped
of their foundations in God as creator, lawgiver, and judge.
As for this
issue, it is not just
about contraception, it includes abortion which is a direct violation
of our Declaration
of Independence, but more important, a direct violation
of Gods
Law.
There was, to be sure, a pastoral problem
of the «troubled conscience» in the late medieval Church, brought
about — to oversimplify — by the convergence
of certain unresolved
issues in Augustine's theology
of grace with certain developments in the canon
law of penance.
Amnesty International is up to no good, and they don't want you to know
about it.My friend Richard Stith, professor
of law at Valparaiso University, first drew my attention to the
issue on the Mirror
of Justice blog
about a year ago.
It is identical to racial
issues: civil and church
laws need to protect the truth
about the equal dignity
of all races because that truth allows us to treat others as persons.
... The Jews (just like the church now) got flippant concerning divorce... I feel Jesus didn't have to mention homosexuality because the
Law was clear to any Jew at that time... Paul had to mention it because he was an apostle to the Gentiles who I think were more prone to homosexuality behavior... I'm though not as learned as you... just my thought after 15 years
of thinking
about this
issue... The church has a sacred duty to all... even gays... we need a unified loving answer to give them... but it must be the truth... because only the truth can set us free...
When the
Law of Love becomes the measure
of whether or not an act sinful, the
issue is no longer
about sexual orientation, hetero or homosexuality; but whether the act is one
of expressing love or exercising power / control over another.
In general, based on the 2003 interview, it doesn't look like Santorum knows how to talk or think
about this
issue very well; he doesn't, for example, appear to know how to distinguish the three levels
of the right to privacy debate: a) the natural rights level, b) the Constitutional level, and c) the plain - old
law level, state and federal.
The Bishop
of Birmingham, invoking the full authority
of canon
law, has
issued a decree
about how the Mass will be celebrated in that diocese, on television or off.
The fundamental (excuse the pun) problems with far - right Christianity are exactly the same
issues our Savior spoke
about to the Pharisees: judgmentalism, hypocrisy, intolerance, and the hyper - extremity
of observing the letter
of the
law rather than its spirit (as evidenced by statements from various preachers that people such gays and disobedient children should be killed).
The fears
about standing and
about funding
of religious organizations are important questions
of law, but both were satisfactorily resolved under the Supreme Court's traditional standing rules and there is no reason to think RFRA would reopen the
issue.
We are told that members
of a community can disagree
about some rather fundamental
issues; nineteenth - century chemists did not all have to accept atomism as long as they all accepted the
laws of combining proportions.
The only reason you people do not have an
issue with the President's support
of gay marriage is because you do not care
about or are not bound by the
laws of God.
The Republicans were freaked
about JFK's Catholic
issue... Then the GOP» ers are very concerned
about Islamic Brothers and Sharia
law rule... BUT, they seem little problem with the Book
of Mormon... Hummmmmm... are they leading us to the «land
of (bilk) milk and honey» now, and prosperity?
The foreword
of the present book includes a 1965 letter from Ramsey to Fletcher: «[T] he candid
issue between us is whether agape is expressed in acts only or in rules also, which question is generally begged; or else the structures in which human beings live are attributed to other than uniquely Christian sources
of understanding (natural
law, etc.) while Christians go
about pretending to live in a world without principles.
To understand what he is talking
about, one needs to know something
of the
issue at stake in the whole letter, the problems in the Galatian churches to which it is sent, the peculiar meanings words like «
law» have for Paul, and similar matters
of historical understanding.
It seems that when teams
of doorstep canvassers are sent out to chat with thousands
of residents
about same - sex marriage, swift and durable change occurs in the opinions on that
issue held by subjects who chatted with a gay canvasser whose script told him to say that he'd really like to get married but the
law won't allow it.
Here are some details
about that November 2004 ballot proposal: 1) there was already in place a Utah
law strictly banning same - sex marriage, which I fully supported; 2) all three candidates for the office
of attorney general
of Utah (the chief
law - enforcement officer in the state) opposed the amendment, including the LDS (Mormon) Republican incumbent, Mark Shurtleff, mostly because they considered it a poorly drafted amendment; 3) I refused to endorse the amendment, but I did not urge people to vote «no»; 4) the leadership
of the LDS Church, which has a record for being as strongly opposed to same - sex marriage as the Catholic Church, did not
issue a statement urging its members to vote one way or the other; 5) inasmuch as two thirds
of Utahans belong to the LDS Church, this means that the leadership
of at least 80 percent
of Utah churchgoers did not urge a «yes» vote on the amendment.
«When it comes to challenges to religious liberty, the Johnson Amendment is just
about the least important
issue I can think
of,» said John Inazu, a professor at Washington University School
of Law.
Those who argue that since Christ is the end
of the
law, the Old Testament
law is irrelevant must, if consistent, deal with the New Testament pronouncements
about sexual
issues, including Paul's various declarations.
My way
of approaching the
issue of whether to facilitate, conduct, or defend enhanced interrogation, he says, «is to urge that decisions
about the detention and interrogation
of such prisoner be made according to the codes
of those professionals involved in the process... rather than, say, according to the
law of the United States.»
Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services
of the church would be held; the church needed to be told
of the impending visit
of an apostle, or
of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith
of one
of these visitors, and there must be some discussion
of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member
of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter
of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute
about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two
of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the
issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the
law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means
of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one
of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one
of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf
of his family in the emergency; differences
of opinion exist in the church on certain questions
of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?
And this time it is not
about the FSS
law but the
issue pertains to the appointment
of its present chairman.
The practice has raised fresh concerns among insiders
about possible collusion
issues and potential breaches
of price signalling
laws.
Sims» speech also sets out the ACCC's activities in relation to a number
of areas
of competition
law (cartels, anti-competitive agreements and practices, MMP (noting the ACCC has «
about» 10 in depth investigations underway)-RRB- and touches on the Harper Review and Murray Report as well as key
issues surrounding privatisation, communications and water.
There are fathers standing up and speaking out across the globe
about these types
of issues and the
laws that were created many decades if not centuries ago.
Where a couple used a known donor,
issues about the donor's parental status have arisen not only under New York's
law, but also in other states as well, reinforcing the importance
of second parent adoptions to forestall conflicts that could arise in other jurisdictions.
Here are the videos that accompany my DN column today
about critics
of Nassau County DA Kathleen Rice accusing her
of flip - flopping on a touchstone
issue for liberals — Rockefeller Drug
Law reform.
The same basic ideas that a lot
of us in the Democratic political world have been talking
about, that Democratic campaigns ignored big - picture messaging around the economy, the health care
law, immigration and other base - mobilizing
issues while still running a turnout operation that was highly proficient technically.
It's fairly rare for a backbench MP to have the opportunity to change the
law of this country and there were hundreds
of issues that I could have taken forward, so I took my time and thought long and hard
about what I wanted to bring forward.
Many
of these rules come
about via statute while others emerge from the courts in the resolution
of common
law issues, in particular
issues of tort.
While more Americans lose their jobs every day, the Obama Administration is blatantly ignoring the
law of the land for a political stunt, and I hope the Administration will reconsider this wrong decision and focus on strengthening the economy and creating jobs, the number one
issue the majority
of Western New Yorkers care
about.»
I also asked Heastie if he's concerned
about the governor's increased reliance
of late on his executive powers to circumvent the Legislature on key policy
issues like a minimum wage increase for the state's fast food workers and creation
of a special prosecutor to handle cases in which unarmed civilians die at the hands
of law enforcement officers.
Also, with electorate nearly equally split over a majority
of important
issues, the size
of the body matters slightly less, but a larger body is more likely to allow passing more
laws since you can always trade votes between blocks on random
laws that a given block cares less
about (e.g. I'll vote for your farm bill if you vote for my factory bill).
The fact is that the European Union
issue is more important than any
of that, because it's
about the decision
of whether you want your
laws made in Brussels and that march towards ever - closer union, or whether you want our country to make its own
laws, our politicians to make the
laws in this country, for us to be able to determine our immigration policy, to decide how we're spending our public money.
If you can do any
of get, say, a couple
of million people to sign a petition calling for the abolition
of the minimum wage; win parliamentary seats by running on this
issue; or provide polling evidence showing majorities would repeal the race, gender discrimination
laws, etc then I will withdraw the claim
about this being a minority position.
5.3 All the people
of Rep. of Cyprus (even the President of RoC) MUST apply to the LEGAL SYSTEM of Northern Cyprus about an issue related with north Cyprus in order to take their cases to the ECtHR: ECtHR 04.01.2011 decision: «the procedure before the Immovable Property Commission («IPC»), and further appeal to the «TRNC» High Administrative Court, provided for in Law 67/2005, were to be regarded as «domestic remedies» of the respondent State and that NO GROUND OF EXEMPTION has been established in that regard»
of Rep.
of Cyprus (even the President of RoC) MUST apply to the LEGAL SYSTEM of Northern Cyprus about an issue related with north Cyprus in order to take their cases to the ECtHR: ECtHR 04.01.2011 decision: «the procedure before the Immovable Property Commission («IPC»), and further appeal to the «TRNC» High Administrative Court, provided for in Law 67/2005, were to be regarded as «domestic remedies» of the respondent State and that NO GROUND OF EXEMPTION has been established in that regard»
of Cyprus (even the President
of RoC) MUST apply to the LEGAL SYSTEM of Northern Cyprus about an issue related with north Cyprus in order to take their cases to the ECtHR: ECtHR 04.01.2011 decision: «the procedure before the Immovable Property Commission («IPC»), and further appeal to the «TRNC» High Administrative Court, provided for in Law 67/2005, were to be regarded as «domestic remedies» of the respondent State and that NO GROUND OF EXEMPTION has been established in that regard»
of RoC) MUST apply to the LEGAL SYSTEM
of Northern Cyprus about an issue related with north Cyprus in order to take their cases to the ECtHR: ECtHR 04.01.2011 decision: «the procedure before the Immovable Property Commission («IPC»), and further appeal to the «TRNC» High Administrative Court, provided for in Law 67/2005, were to be regarded as «domestic remedies» of the respondent State and that NO GROUND OF EXEMPTION has been established in that regard»
of Northern Cyprus
about an
issue related with north Cyprus in order to take their cases to the ECtHR: ECtHR 04.01.2011 decision: «the procedure before the Immovable Property Commission («IPC»), and further appeal to the «TRNC» High Administrative Court, provided for in
Law 67/2005, were to be regarded as «domestic remedies»
of the respondent State and that NO GROUND OF EXEMPTION has been established in that regard»
of the respondent State and that NO GROUND
OF EXEMPTION has been established in that regard»
OF EXEMPTION has been established in that regard».
Tsedeye Gebreselassie
of the National Employment
Law Project, Senator Daniel Squadron, and 32BJ SEIU President Hector Figueroa, joined us to talk more
about the
issue of income inequality and the effort to build support for higher wages.