Sentences with phrase «about judicial case»

In D (Appeal: Failure of Case Management)[2017] EWHC 1907 (Fam)(24 July 2017) the Court of Appeal recently considered the mother's application for an appeal which raised issues about judicial case management and in particular the Court's...

Not exact matches

All told, the RECAP Archive now contains about 3.4 million documents from 1.5 million federal district court and bankruptcy cases from 1960 to the present, including all judicial opinions available via the Written Opinions Report.

Whatever Marbury was supposed to mean about the scope of the power of judicial review, it is a notable fact that the Court declined to exercise that power to declare another act of Congress to be unconstitutional until 1857, when it ruled in the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford.

Cuomo at the time whenever asked about the case said he did not want to interfere with the judicial process.

The charge against him read in part, «That you, Robert Obuoha, on or about the 12th day of February, 2016 in Port Harcourt at the Port Harcourt Judicial Division did corruptly give N150, 000 only to Mr. Ishaq Salihu, a public officer and Zonal Head of Operations, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, South - South Zone, for the purpose of recharge cards and with a view to influencing his decision in a case wherein you are being investigated and thereby committed an offence, official corruption, contrary to Section 13 (1)(a) of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2003 and punishable under section 13 (1) of the same Act.»

Stevens supported his argument by citing Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., [39] where the Court held that $ 3 million in independent expenditures in a judicial race raised sufficient questions about a judge's impartiality to require the judge to recuse himself in a future case involving the spender.

The judicial headnote specifically disproves the argument being put about for why the reporting committee didn't report the case.

She pointed out that as a judicial candidate, she was not allowed to «talk about or endorse any candidate,» nor was she permitted to talk about «any case.»

Asked about the Wandering Dago case and whether the importance of emails can be assessed in 90 days, he said: «There are any number of situations that have arisen in which a record, or for that matter, a judicial decision might appear to be less than significant but would take on additional significance with the passage of time or the occurrence of events.

Mr Hain, a former Northern Ireland Secretary, made the comments about the handling of a judicial review case by Lord Justice Girvan in 2006.

Australia About Blog This site is designed to provide resources relating to Australia's competition laws, including links to legislative history, key cases, information about relevant guidelines, expert and judicial profiles, a chronology of Australian competition law, key links to further resources and About Blog This site is designed to provide resources relating to Australia's competition laws, including links to legislative history, key cases, information about relevant guidelines, expert and judicial profiles, a chronology of Australian competition law, key links to further resources and about relevant guidelines, expert and judicial profiles, a chronology of Australian competition law, key links to further resources and more.

I highly doubt that Eskelsen García would have groused about judicial activism in those cases.

Bob Cole, Lake County supervisor for the 5th Judicial Circuit state attorney's office, said Thursday he plans to talk to Brown about the case.

A federal judge presiding over Sierra Pacific Industries» appeal of a $ 122.5 million wildfire settlement raised some brows — and a motion for judicial notice — after tweeting an article about the case to a then - public Twitter account.

If someone complained about the judge's conduct to a judicial ethics body in Texas, the judge would very likely receive a private reprimand or maybe if the ethics panel was particularly incensed, a public reprimand, but only because he lost his cool on the bench, not because he required the potential juror to stick around until another suitable case could be found.

In one training session organized by the National Judicial Institute, a judge was telling me about a criminal case anecdote I found both informative and entertaining.

The casus belli, which has prompted the current debate about the EU's judicial architecture, is the increase in the number of new cases brought before the GC (from 398 in 2000 to 912 in 2014); the stock of cases currently awaiting to be decided (1,423 in 2014 and expected to rise to 1,600 in 2015); and finally, the increasing number of actions for damages brought against the EU due to the excessive length of proceedings before the GC on the basis of Article 47 of the EU Charter, which guarantees a right to have cases heard within a reasonable time.

I wrote in July about WellSettled.com, a site that mines judicial opinions for those parenthetical - style statements and phrases that summarize a case («it is well settled that...»).

The site's founders intend that attorneys, judges, litigants and the public will use these forums to post candid comments, information and opinions about the nation's courts, judges, judicial nominees and cases.

Current ethics rules prohibit lawyers from trying to influence the judicial process so lawyers should not be blogging about ongoing cases for that reason.

It occurs to me, reading what is googleable about Eloise's work for a few minutes that she (i) assisted with the investigation into a death in police custody while seconded to the IPCC (ii) was seconded to a solicitors» firm to assist with the phone hacking disclosure (iii) did pro bono work (iv) was involved with a judicial review of a costs order that was requested by a Local Authority in a Non Payment Council Tax case at the local magistrates, which got into the law reports.

In the Redknapp case, although production orders under s 345 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and special procedure search warrants under PACE 1984, s 9 had previously been granted by a Crown Court judge, it was a warrant under PACE 1984, s 8 that brought about the judicial review.

«There's Something Fishy About Blawg Review # 215 Main Supreme Court Issues Landmark Ruling in Judicial Bias Case»

I've heard rumors about a non-verbal code of ethics among the Judicial community where they will support each other no matter the case.

While there is nothing particularly unusual about this case, it does provide a good platform from which to revisit some of the fundamentals in judicial review as we enter 2015.

This case raises challenging questions about the proper constitutional role of courts, their appropriate function on judicial review, and the relationship between administrative tribunals and the judiciary.

They do not work for the judges of the court, they can not make legal decisions about your case, and they do not have the authority of a judicial officer.

Meanwhile, the New Mexico Judicial Standards Commission similarly cautioned a judge who merely commented about a case over which the judge was presiding on social media.

Citators offered by commercial publishers are more complete and much more sophisticated; they include information about subsequent judicial treatment of cases.

For current information about the court's operating hours, days of operation, judges, cases, procedures, and the like, click to visit the Eighth Judicial District Court website.

What is unusual about the case described above is that the applicant brought judicial review proceedings, challenging the police decision to disclose information about her son.

In the news you often read about differing philosophies of judicial interpretation, especially when important cases are decided (like several recent US Supreme Court decisions).

We recorded information about every judicial action over each case's life.

Despite significant judicial discussion on the point in many common law jurisdictions, there is little discussion in EU cases about who the client is or whether communications with external lawyers and a client's corporate employees are protected.

I will continue to follow the Judicial development of this rule and write about relevant cases as they come to my attention.

(3) If an allegation of misconduct against a provincial judge is made to any other judge or to the Attorney General, the other judge, or the Attorney General, as the case may be, shall provide the person making the allegation with information about the Judicial Council's role in the justice system and about how a complaint may be made, and shall refer the person to the Judicial Council.

denied, 540 U.S. 825 (2003): In reviewing charges stemming from a pro-prosecution judicial campaign, the Florida Supreme Court upheld the pledge or promise clause, the commit clause, and the clause prohibiting false statements or misrepresentations about an opponent (in this case, giving a misleading account of the incumbent's granting bail in a particular case) of the Florida Code of Judicial judicial campaign, the Florida Supreme Court upheld the pledge or promise clause, the commit clause, and the clause prohibiting false statements or misrepresentations about an opponent (in this case, giving a misleading account of the incumbent's granting bail in a particular case) of the Florida Code of Judicial Judicial Conduct.

The first half outlined the series of judicial review claims that have been brought over the last two years to challenge the lawfulness of the cuts to legal aid brought about by the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Act 2012, while the second half examined the effect of human rights in individual cases across different areas of law.

Many ABlawg readers will know that Alice Woolley, Elaine Craig, Jocelyn Downie and I filed a complaint about Justice Robin Camp's conduct in the Wagar case to the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC).

For example in Ishaq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 156, (a case about whether a woman could wear her niqab during a citizenship ceremony), six public interest groups — including the Ontario Human Rights Commission, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the National Council of Canadian Muslims — were refused permission to intervene, as the court determined that they could not advance their proposed arguments without social science evidence to back them up; nor could the court take judicial notice (facts and materials are accepted on a common sense basis without being formally admitted in evidence) of any of the facts necessary to support the arguments.

The case involves private rights of value, and constitutional principles of the highest importance about which there had [p455] become such a difference of opinion, that the peace and harmony of the country required the settlement of them by judicial decision.

Here is an interesting case about judicial review of regulations with, in the background, a hint that regulatory power was used to hinder an emerging business model Sobeys West Inc. v. College of Pharmacists of British Columbia, 2014 BCSC 1414.

One might think, for example, that if the Court's concern in this line of cases is about the dangers of judicial discretion, Alito's reading of state law would not necessarily solve the constitutional problem.

The long title explains the result in Conseil des montagnais de Natashquan c. Malec, 2012 CF 1392, a case about alleged discrimination against Aboriginal educators.An initial decision unfavourable to the applicant was made, but quashed on judicial review.

Law clerks have the opportunity to engage in discussion with judges about cases they are hearing, developments in the law, aspects of the trial or appellate process, and the judicial process in general.

In this case, the Board could participate without compromising the principles of finality and impartiality (at paras. 60 - 62) and, although Rothstein J. sounded a «note of caution» about the Board's suggestion that even if it lost on judicial review it would reach the same result in fresh proceedings, he felt «the Board generally acted in such a way as to present helpful argument in an adversarial but respectful manner» (at para. 72).

A comment from one judge specifically highlights the importance of being careful with humour when people affected by the case are present, even if not directly party to the action: «One has to be very careful about judicial humour because you've got victims and you've got relatives of families».

In telling students this, I think I inevitably left the (mistaken) impression, by inference, that one did not need to worry about noting up Supreme Court of Canada cases after 1949 for judicial history (i.e., to see if the case was reversed on appeal)(but I am consistent in telling students that one should always noteup all Supreme Court of Canada decisions from any period of time for judicial and academic commentary and to find «like» cases, which would have, in the situation that follows, have caught the mistake in any event).

«We are of the view that there is no real principled reason for such a large discrepancy other than a difference in how damages cases are being advanced by lawyers in the different provinces, which is in turn impacting different judicial attitudes and perceptions about what is reasonable and what is not,» says Nijjar.

HELD While decisions of a Home Secretary under the scheme are susceptible to judicial review, intervention by the courts should be highly guarded and limited to cases where there is an issue about the reach and meaning of a policy where a minister, in his application and / or interpretation of it, strays outside the reasonable range of meaning, or where there is ambiguity.