Sentences with phrase «about judicial conduct»

Charles Geyh, an Indiana University law professor who writes about judicial conduct and ethics, told The Washington Post: «Presidents have disagreed with court rulings all the time.

Not exact matches

Granting the Supreme Court supremacy in conducting discourse about values through the mechanism of judicial review disempowers the people from full participation in their government and their communities.

A complex modern democracy is at a serious disadvantage in dealing with autocratic states as well as in expeditiously conducting its own internal affairs, unless it possesses strong executive powers which are not hedged about in matters of detailed policy and administration by legislative and judicial agencies.

The bill's clause six, which Mr Jack claims is potentially ambiguous about the basis of principles of MPs» code of conduct, could be subject to judicial review as a result.

To make a decision about whether or not to disclose a crime or violation and participate in the judicial or conduct process and / or criminal justice process free from pressure by the School;

If someone complained about the judge's conduct to a judicial ethics body in Texas, the judge would very likely receive a private reprimand or maybe if the ethics panel was particularly incensed, a public reprimand, but only because he lost his cool on the bench, not because he required the potential juror to stick around until another suitable case could be found.

So what is it about small - time judges that makes some of them simply unable to adhere to the expected norms of judicial conduct?

I have recently filed a petition for judicial review of the conduct of one of Canada's law societies and I plan on presenting an argument about a pervasive and inherent bias that afflicts the entire legal profession.

The complaint about the conduct of Justice Camp dated November 9, 2015, was first brought before the Canadian Judicial Council by four law professors — Alice Woolley and Jennifer Koshan of the University of Calgary, and Elaine Craig and Jocelyn Downie of Dalhousie University.

As part of the WTLA's review of the bench, IAALS Executive Director Rebecca Love Kourlis wrote an article about one way that Wyoming can enhance its selection and retention process, by conducting judicial performance...

Many ABlawg readers will know that Alice Woolley, Elaine Craig, Jocelyn Downie and I filed a complaint about Justice Robin Camp's conduct in the Wagar case to the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC).

Nonetheless, when Best complained to the Canadian Judicial Council about Justice Shaughnessy's serious misconduct, the CJC didn't even investigate, saying that the judge's actions were not «conduct» under the CJC's mandate.

When someone complains about a provincially appointed judge's conduct, the complaint is heard by the Ontairo Judicial Council (or it's equivalent in other provinces).

With respect to conduct, I can speak to you with intimate knowledge of the federally appointed judiciary, because I preside over the Canadian Judicial Council, which has the statutory responsibility to receive complaints about federally appointed judges.

On their face, however, they do raise three issues that seem prima facie of concern: 1) the legitimacy of having rulings by the Federal Court about its process without any submissions made on the Committee's behalf; 2) the legitimacy of the Federal Court reviewing the Committee's conduct on an interlocutory basis; and 3) the legitimacy of the Federal Court intervening in a process designed to respect judicial independence, and to provide a mechanism for implementing s. 99 of the Constitution.

U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson of Kansas, the chair of the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, told the nation's judges in a Jan. 28 memo that the new jury instructions «address the increasing incidence of juror use, of such devices as cellular telephones or computers, to conduct research on the internet or communicate with others about cases».

It has two main purposes: recommending candidates for judicial appointment to Provincial Court, and hearing complaints about the conduct of Provincial Court judges.

Lawyers also have a voice (March 2012 Dore vs. Boilard) to complain about a Judge's conduct to the Judicial Council.

In the V.I. case, Superior Court Judge Leon Kendall turned to Cooper when he sought to block the V.I. Commission on Judicial Disabilities from hearing complaints about his conduct on the bench.

In addition to complaints about judicial misconduct, the Act permits any person to allege conduct reflecting a judge's inability to perform his or her duties because of «mental or physical disability.»