The same can hopefully be said of my writing and commentary
about judicial ethics and the administration of justice generally.
1870: Concerned
about judicial ethics in the wake of the Tweed scandals, Bangs and 200 of the City's other leading lawyers form the first significant association of professional lawyers, the Association of the Bar of the City of New York.
Not exact matches
But now, according to The Journal, we learn that Flynn's work involved a meeting on September 19, 2016 with senior Turkish government officials to discuss how to remove a Turkish dissident from the United States without going through
judicial or other legal processes — actions that could violate U.S. criminal laws and that certainly raise anew serious questions
about Flynn's judgment and
ethics.
If someone complained
about the judge's conduct to a
judicial ethics body in Texas, the judge would very likely receive a private reprimand or maybe if the
ethics panel was particularly incensed, a public reprimand, but only because he lost his cool on the bench, not because he required the potential juror to stick around until another suitable case could be found.
Current
ethics rules prohibit lawyers from trying to influence the
judicial process so lawyers should not be blogging
about ongoing cases for that reason.
«But with 25 judges suing for libel in 2005 alone — nearly 10 percent of all libel suits filed nationwide — that form of
judicial restraint is fading, raising questions
about the role, and the
ethics, of judges and whether they have a right to be as litigious as everyone else.»
I've heard rumors
about a non-verbal code of
ethics among the
Judicial community where they will support each other no matter the case.
A
judicial ethics panel of the Massachusetts court system has determined that a judge may ethically maintain a Twitter account, but only within certain boundaries, and that a judge must be particularly cautious
about selecting accounts to follow on Twitter.
Upholding
judicial independence and
judicial ethics might actually prevent us from having a real conversation
about these differences of vision.
Charles Geyh, an Indiana University law professor who writes
about judicial conduct and
ethics, told The Washington Post: «Presidents have disagreed with court rulings all the time.
Other US state committees on
judicial ethics have also taken positions warning judges
about the perils of networking.