Panel four, chaired by Prof. Susan Trevaskes, offered a general discussion
about judicial reforms in China.
«We have seen nothing from this legislative body that would indicate they are serious
about judicial reform,» she said.
Not exact matches
A former aide to Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonTrump Jr. met with Gulf adviser who offered help to win election: report Voters Dems need aren't impressed by anti-waterboarding showboating After year of investigation, Trump can rightly claim some vindication MORE criticized Sen. Kirsten GillibrandKirsten Elizabeth GillibrandOvernight Health Care — Sponsored by PCMA — Trump hits federally funded clinics with new abortion restrictions Dem senators ask drug companies to list prices in ads Gillibrand to publish children's book
about suffragists MORE on Thursday after the New York Democrat became the first of many senators to join a successful push to force the resignation of Sen. Al FrankenAlan (Al) Stuart Franken100 days after House passage, Gillibrand calls on Senate to act on sexual harassment
reform Eric Schneiderman and #MeToo pose challenges for both parties Senate confirms Trump
judicial pick over objections of home - state senator MORE (D - Minn.).
The
Reform Party will hold a semi-open primary, giving
about 15,000 people in Syracuse a chance to cast ballots for mayor in Tuesday's primary as well as several
judicial races.
One proposal of the Lord Chancellor on
reforming judicial review last year was the narrowing of the tests for standing, namely the ability to come to court and complain
about some public law unlawfulness: see, e.g. here.
Judge Dory Reiling, Vice President of the Amsterdam District Court, http://j.mp/4yzmBI, has just published her dissertation on this topic, entitled Technology for Justice: How Information Technology Can Support
Judicial Reform (2009), abstract: http://j.mp/4zIDoU, and writes a blog
about this topic, http://doryreiling.blogspot.com/, which may be of interest.
My point was that these
reforms came
about because the courts, specifically the Warren Court, forced the police to institute better procedures with
judicial oversight.