Sentences with phrase «about less government»
Democrats aren't about less government, they want more and that only leads to stagnation, more spending and higher taxes.
http://www.nystateofpolitics.com/ Not exact matches
About that, the government is less confident.
He's less hopeful about the Bangladeshi government's initiatives, but says, «I think that part of the key points of this agreement is that you've got some of the major buyers in Bangladesh working with some of the major trade unions and labour rights groups together to push on Bangladesh and I think that combination is going to be a powerful force.»
The value of Kaspersky's software sales to the U.S. government totaled less than $ 54,000, or about 0.03 percent of its U.S. subsidiary's sales in the United States, according to the complaint.
People close to Trump have suggested Cohen is likely to «flip,» or cooperate with the government by providing information about others in exchange for a lesser punishment.
Investment - grade corporates pay about two percentage points more than short - term government bonds, and they're less risky than they used to be.
But «when you're talking about small, medium enterprises, there's a little less pressure — the government doesn't see that as having any way to shape the economy, or cause issues with policy,» he said.
A question I had for the company is: how do governments and national banks feel about local currencies... which of course mean that actual fiat government currencies would be used less.
Others are less optimistic about the changes in recent months and expect the government to find itself in a similar budgetary position.
Perhaps Joe Oliver could have used less inflammatory language in his letter and talked about what the federal government could do to mitigate environmental concerns.
The speed with which China's GDP growth slows in 2013 will tell us a lot about how determined Beijing is to rebalance the economy in such a way that growth is driven more by higher household income and consumption and less by investment funded by rising government and government - related debt.
The BofA Merrill Lynch high - yield index is trading at roughly 600 basis points versus government bonds, but if energy, metals and mining is excluded, it's about 80 basis points less in terms of spread.
Mr. Flaherty's trip to New York and his lecturing the U.S. government was clearly meant for Canadian consumption, since the U.S. Treasury Secretary could hardly care less about what Mr. Flaherty thinks.
So if you're already 52 years old, and you're expecting a nice government pension that's inflation adjusted, and you expect Social Security, and you have to worry less about, say, Social Security cuts for example.
The ECB's Draghi dropped more hints about how the central bank could support struggling countries, suggesting it was free to buy government bonds maturing in three years or less.
The better - than - month - long climb in the market since the election of Donald J. Trump as President - elect has been driven by optimism about domestic economic stimulus and the expectation that the incoming Administration will push for lower corporate taxes and less government regulation.
The government aims to increase capacity to 350 MW by 2020, or about 5 percent of projected peak electricity demand, up from less than 1 percent now, according to EMA.
I gather he was banned from India for a while year ago and then unbanned more recently, so perhaps the Government of India cares less about him than some in the Canadian media.
The Opposition can complain about it, but it has no power to make the government listen, much less change its mind on anything.
If you think about it, if you are long government bonds that yield less than 1 % (or negative), you are massively short optionality.
Liberal government pledges to reduce to $ 3 the fares for all GO Transit trips that are either less than 10 kilometres or are taken within the city of Toronto, and wants to being talks about the province taking ownership of the subway.
This gives them certain advantages over centralized exchange platforms: they do not collect information about users, their accounts, or transactions and they do not aggregate trade volume, which makes them far less prone to hacker attacks; they can not be easily seized or shut down due to government censorship or other external factors.
Think about it, if the government is driving revenue through crypto, it's less likely to ban it.
The FDP is thought to be even less inclined to bring about closer European integration than past Merkel governments.
Charles Hugh Smith talks about the disparity in the government's CPI index that states the cost of living is less than 2 % per year when reality is different.
Requests for user information: Yandex disclosed less than most of its peers but more than Mail.Ru about how it handles government and private requests for user information (P10 - P12).
Finally, GM's quick repayment of the loans has whetted the appetite of some commentators (including DeCloet) for the ultimate repayment of the full government contribution. That would occur through the issuance of public equity by GM and Chrysler, creating a market for those stocks into which the government would presumably sell its shares. There is even some nefarious language in the rescue packages requiring the government to sell off its shares within specified, relatively aggressive timelines. The more I think about it, the less this makes sense — neither for the auto industry, nor for taxpayers. Why not hang onto the equity stake? If the companies recover and the equity gains market value, then the government will be able to claim that on its balance sheet (hence officially recouping the cost of its written - off contributions and creating a budgetary gain).
For instance, Hamid speculates about a future political order, based on pure democratic assemblies: «How this assembly would coexist with other preexisting bodies of government was as yet undecided... [U] nlike those other entities for which some humans were not human enough to exercise suffrage, this new assembly would speak from the will of all the people, and in the face of that will, it was hoped, greater justice might be less easily denied.»
The Court was less than clear about the precise contours of the «high duty» it imposed on other government officials.
When in the 1970s there began to be much discussion about «mediating structures» and voluntarism, when Ronald Reagan urged us to rely on government less and on ourselves more, when George Bush talked about a «thousand points of light,» those of a statist mind - set groused that it was all a scheme to cut back on government social services.
We need to be more confident, and therefore less reliant on sky - is - falling rhetoric about government takeovers.
The following analogy might help: Cover the entire North American continent in dimes all the way up to the moon, a height of about 239,000 miles (In comparison, the money to pay for the U.S. federal government debt would cover one square mile less than two feet deep with dimes.).
America's Roman Catholic bishops write that the «challenge of today is to move beyond abstract disputes about whether more or less government intervention is needed, to consideration of creative ways of enabling government and private groups to work together effectively» (Economic Justice for All) The truth of this declaration is evident in the U.S. housing...
The study also found that students are significantly less cynical about politics and government than their elders; they simply tend to view politics as irrelevant to their lives and to the issues they care about.
One of the appalling things about «social conservatism» was that it was no less set on expanding government programs for the poor than the welfarist's agenda.
He believes that what Christians value can be attained better when national governments, more or less representative of their people, make their own decisions about trade.
America's Roman Catholic bishops write that the «challenge of today is to move beyond abstract disputes about whether more or less government intervention is needed, to consideration of creative ways of enabling government and private groups to work together effectively» (Economic Justice for All) The truth of this declaration is evident in the U.S. housing crisis.
A less obvious policy contradiction in the Green Paper relates to the government's claim about «supplying the Asian century».
When asked about the Rudd Government policy of not allowing any asylum seekers to settle in Australia if they come by boat, less than half (42 %) of Australians agree.
The discussion here has been very instructive and I can actually see valid points on both sides of the issue (less government vs. more government intervention) when talking about children's nutrition at school.
The economic perspective is fairly straightforward, the government nets about $ 20 billion (source is from 2014, this number will likely be far less the coming year as Trump's tax bill more than doubled the exclusion amount from $ 5.49 million to $ 11.2 million) from a small amount of people, so opposition by those directly affected is small by comparison to, say, income tax.
As far as Government is concerned, though they do not talk about population as a huge problem, there are Government schemes in place which spread the message of the benefits of less children (Hum do hamare do - an old campaign that promotes having two kids at max.).
Therefore, the Republican Party needs to talk less about getting government out of the way and more about how it can work better in empowering individuals and communities.
Running a government isn't easy and masses aren't necessarily any more (and possibly, quite less) informed about the big picture than the representatives are.
Julián López Murcia interviews Christopher Hood and Ruth Dixon about their new book «A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less?
Eleanor Rathbone used her voice to elevate the voices of others, used whatever influence she had to help those less fortunate, and never thought twice about voicing truths to governments that they would have preferred not to hear.
But he is less relaxed about Brexit combined with a Tory government.
The expenses upheaval of 2009 means that many dying swans are already dead, so that the Coalition need worry less about unhappy incumbents than previous governments.
With speculation at various points that the Government would struggle to get the Bill through as it wished - with MPs wanting to change the referendum date, impose those thresholds or be less prescriptive about the electorate quotas of the new constituencies - the whips will doubtless be quietly pleased about it attaining a majority of 57.
57 % of the public expected the coalition to be tougher than the last Labour government in dealing with crime; only 13 % thought it was being tougher; 23 % said it was less tough and 64 % said it was about the same.