t's not far - fetched to think
about lethal autonomous weapons systems now» in order to consider consequences of this technology and what can be done.
There's a need to focus greater attention on the ongoing diplomatic process at the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW) in Geneva, where some 90 countries are considering what to do
about lethal autonomous weapons systems.
That is why we are with those who are in favor of not only continuing, but deepening and intensifying the ongoing international debate
about lethal autonomous weapons systems.
Not exact matches
When asked
about an international ban across different types of
lethal autonomous weapons for missions on land, air, and sea, 67 % of our participants indicated that all types of
lethal autonomous systems should be internationally banned, while 14 % said that none of such
systems should be banned.
What's special
about an agreement to hold a four - day meeting of experts to consider questions relating to «
lethal autonomous weapons systems?»
At the end of August, Russia said it is uncertain
about whether states should move to the next level of deliberations on
lethal autonomous weapons systems when the CCW holds its 5th Review Conference in Geneva on December 12 - 16.
Throughout the year, Russia objected to the creation of a Group of Governmental Experts, raising «major doubts»
about the need to do so now and arguing that it was «premature» when there is not yet an agreed - upon definition of
lethal autonomous weapons systems.
... New Zealand will develop a position on [
lethal autonomous weapons systems] in concert with other governments when the international community is clearer
about their potential impact and when there is a clearer understanding
about how a line could be drawn between automated and
autonomous weapons.»