On one level Jesus heals a cripple, opens the eyes of the blind or raises the dead, but on another level he reveals a truth
about life eternal which God makes available in Jesus Christ.
Not exact matches
The history of government welfare programs is overwhelmingly biased towards expansion; hence, President Reagan's quote
about a government program being the closest thing to
eternal life we will see on earth.
And in the end you, who do nt believe in God, stand before a very real God to give an account for your
eternal life... One thing
about media is that media mostly announces the bad things that go on in the world, barely the positives.
Have those misconceptions
about the Law given to the Jews clearly explained and find out why God allows suffering and where the idea of a hellfire really came from and what the truth is that leads to
eternal life.
tallulah: Talking to someone on their death bed
about eternal life is a most important discussion point.
If she's not witnessing to the person and talking to them
about eternal life through Jesus Christ, she's not ultimately doing them any good.
God controls all of
life and all of evolution, he isn't worried
about time as he is
eternal and time isn't an issuefor him.
ddeev... I have always been curious
about people that deemed
eternal life more desirable than reality.
I was just curious
about the mindset of those who deemed non existence more desirable than
eternal life, even when viewing the Christian option as hypothetical.
There is nothing significant
about assuming or debating which
eternal life Judas is enduring.
God is doing something
about all the destruction of this world, and has a solution — Faith in His Son Jesus Christ will get you forgiveness of all your sins,
eternal life in an immortal body, and everything good you could ever imagine, both now and in heaven.
Paul was talking to CHRISTIANS and talking
about th
eternal life with God... use the context..
God created Adam from a handful of dirt and his spouse from a rib; Talking snakes; trees that bear fruit, that imparts knowledge and
eternal life; a global flood, that required a pair of each organism on earth, be stuffed onto a boat; people who
lived hundreds of years; a man who was swallowed by a fish, only to be spit up 3 days later, unhurt; a tower god was afraid might reach heaven; a woman who is turned into a pillar of salt; talking donkeys; unicorns; satyrs; a leviathan god creates and then does battle with; a zombie messiah, who was actually god incarnate; zombie Saints who left their graves and wandered
about the town; belief in a circular, flat earth.
Here is a link
about obtaining
eternal life with Jesus.
These verses, though quite popular as texts
about how to receive
eternal life by grace alone through faith alone, are actually
about what God has done to rescue us from the condition described in Ephesians 2:1 - 3, so that we can become what is described in Ephesians 2:11 - 22.
The Gospel includes an offer of
eternal life, it includes a message
about the forgiveness of sins, it includes facts
about the death and resurrection of Jesus, but these by themselves are not the entire Gospel.
Without the truths of the death and resurrection of Jesus, there is no gospel, but the gospel is way more than a message
about justification and how to get
eternal life.
The debate over «Once Saved, Saved Saved» is easily solved, however, when we realize that almost none of those verses which talk
about «salvation» are actually talking
about eternal life.
And for the majority of Christians, who hold to the traditional Christian view of hell, these matters really are
about (
eternal)
life and death.
He was basically saying that as long as a Christian got something out
about sin, hell, and believing in Jesus for
eternal life, their duty to warn others was fulfilled.
Jeremy it just hit me like a bolt of lightning i am so excited
about this thought that salvation has nothing to do with
eternal life but is speaking of losing the ability to be an overcomer in Christ.Having been there as a carnal christian i always believed in Jesus but i felt i did nt have the power to
live a christian
life so i felt like a hippocrite i was still subject to sin and sinful desires.So in that sense i had never received salvation because i had never been an overcomer in the first place.So i can see how a christian could lose there salvation having once walked by faith but that does nt effect there
eternal life in Christ.Just so others know i am now walking by faith and am an overcomer i know what it is like to experience the power of the holy spirit and to not be overcome by my old nature that is what Jesus wants us all to experience rather than being a victim of the enemy.Whether we are an overcomer or not does nt effect our
eternal life.brentnz
think
about it... GOD SO LOVED YOU THAT HE GAVE HIS ONLY SON THAT IF YOU BELIEVE IN HIM (JESUS) YOU WILL HAVE
ETERNAL LIFE.
That is something to worry
about — that there are people who can't imagine
living for the common good and who feel they must believe in
eternal punishment else they will do things that they think we all should fear.
First and foremost in the thinking of these Next Christians is the rediscovery that the gospel is not just
about evangelism so people can receive
eternal life and go to heaven when they die (cf. pp. 66, 192).
But this passage is not talking
about how to receive
eternal life, but is instead talking
about how God rescued us from our enslavement to the sin of death and showed us a new way of
life in Jesus Christ.
While that is not desirable, which is worse: to occasionally fall into sin ourselves, knowing that such sin is covered by the grace of the cross, OR telling the whole world that although we've been rescued from sin and death and the devil, they can just go to hell because all we care
about is our own
eternal life?
John's baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins was the Jewish baptism of repentance which I wrote a few posts
about, and which has nothing to do with receiving
eternal life, and everything to do with the repentance of Israel as a nation so that she can be restored to her rightful place among the nations as God promised in Scripture.
One popular view
about the unforgivable sin is that it occurs when someone fails to believe in Jesus for
eternal life.
If they know nothing
about God, Jesus, their own separation from God, or anything else, why would they believe in Jesus for
eternal life?
It is not
about eternal life, cooperating with God to receive forgiveness of sins, or anything like this.
The gospel is not just
about how to receive
eternal life, but also
about how to
live this
life.
The term salvation is more appropriately used in this sense because we are talking
about a finality: the decision whether one will attain
eternal life.
That is why in my article above, I tried to only refer to «
eternal life» when I was writing
about what could not be lost.
Again, most of the references you refer to are talking
about something other than
eternal life.
Once we clarify what these words mean, a lot of confusion get pushed away
about what the Bible teaches regarding
eternal life and the condition for receiving it.
So based on this idea
about being able to give up the gift of
eternal life if we want to, is there a Scripture reference for that?
Regarding Hebrew 5:9 and Revelation 14:12, I don't think that either reference is talking
about how to receive
eternal life.
While I believe in
eternal security, I still get the question, «What
about someone who grew up a Christian,
lived as a Christian for years, then quit, denounced Christ, and hasn't followed him since?»
There is nothing here
about believing in Jesus for
eternal life, and you do not get
eternal life by believing that God can clothe and feed someone.
Of course, when we realize that baptism is NOT required for
eternal life, then this entire debate fades away into meaninglessness, but we already talked
about this...
If we are talking
about how to receive
eternal life, it is not simple belief that matters, but believing in the right person for the right thing.
They needed to be among the assembly yesterday of
about 3000 believers in three different services that heard the message of the cross given and the simple message of the gift of
eternal life by believing in the one that was nailed to the cross for our sins.
I think that much of the confusion
about the security of
eternal life comes from this simple misunderstanding.
Since the gospel is
about way more than just receiving
eternal life but is also
about how God's people are to
live their
lives in this world, then the goal of
living out the gospel is not primarily to rescue people from hell so they can go to heaven when they die.
Since it is
about the election and rejection of Israel for God's purposes, many believe that Romans 9 teaches that even after we receive
eternal life, if we fail to
live according to God's purposes, we either lose our
eternal life or we prove we never had it in the first place.
Not only was he not given the clear message
about how to receive
eternal life, he was also given a false message.
The plan of creation is to bring
about souls that will join the
eternal life.
While Peter does teach that baptism saves us, a careful study of the context reveals that Peter is not talking
about gaining
eternal life and going to heaven when we die.
He is talking
about a finite world that is infinitely holy, a world of time that is filled with
life that is
eternal.
In 1 Peter 3:21, Peter is not writing
about how to gain
eternal life.