That was the point; if you are truly talking
about liquid fuels the number is around 200 billion gallons a year.
You get maybe 5 % (and less if you are talking
about all liquid fuels).
Not exact matches
Two years ago Musk showed a photo of BFR's
fuel tank, capable of holding «1200 tons of
liquid oxygen,» as a part of SpaceX's early announcements
about the rocket.
Representing a smattering of different environmental advocacy groups from around the state,
about 250 protesters held signs calling on officials and lawmakers to prohibit any more natural gas pipelines being built in New York, to stop the construction of a proposed
liquid natural gas storage facility next to Seneca Lake, and to shift the state's energy production to greener
fuel sources....
The following year, he and Colozza wrote a paper for the now - defunct NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC)
about the use of electrohydrodynamics, or ionized particles, as an alternative to
liquid fuel for powering space vehicles.
Coal - to -
liquid fuels with carbon capture and storage could replace
about 15 — 20 % of current
fuel consumption in the transportation sector (2 — 3 million barrels per day; the lower estimate holds if coal is also used to produce coal - and - biomass - to -
liquid fuels) and would have lifecycle CO2 emissions similar to petroleum - based
fuels.
There are only
about 50 hydrogen
fueling stations in the United States, and just a handful of those dispense
liquid hydrogen.
Oxidation of hydrocarbon to CO2 releases
about 478 kJ / mol C. That's the minimum amount you need to reduce CO2 to
liquid fuel assuming perfect conversion.
This is all
about making traditional
liquid fuels to feed existing auto designs.
So, apparently, if I understand this correctly, the idea is really
about a way that actually requires an independent source of energy (and a big one) in order to make
liquid fuels and other hydrocarbon - based products in a relatively «carbon - neutral» way.
Andy, thank you for writing
about synthetic
liquid fuels made from dirty coal and other low grade fossil
fuels.
Overall, biofuels now account for
about 1 percent of the global
liquid fuels market.
They spoke at length
about Shell's existing push to produce
liquid fuels from gas, most notably at the huge new gas - to -
liquids plant in Qatar:
Biofuels remain a very minor player, accounting for
about 1.4 per cent of the world's
liquid fuel supply in 2013, the IEA's stats show.
Brazil actually only produces
about 10 % of it
liquid fuels from sugar cane: http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/rapier/2006/0623.html
Since the volumetric energy density of ammonia is three times that of
liquid hydrogen, and ammonia combustion can be exceptionally efficient (
about the same as burning diesel
fuel in turbodiesels), it may be true that a hydrogen economy based upon OTEC and ammonia may be close at hand.
When one takes into consideration the different efficiencies of
liquid -
fueled and electric propulsion, then where the rubber meets the road the cost of powering a plug - in hybrid with average - cost residential electricity would be
about 40 per cent of the cost of powering the same vehicle with today's approximately $ 2.50 / gallon gasoline, or, said another way, for the consumer to be able to buy
fuel in the form of electricity at the equivalent of $ 1 / gallon gasoline.
Operating cost for electric cars is $ 0.50 to $ 0.75 per mile versus $ 0.10 for gasoline powered cars once battery replacement costs are included By 2020, Chinese PER CAPITA emissions will be higher than America's Does not believe that the 0.6 degree temperature rise to date is the West's «fault,» but does believe that China is the future problem Whatever U.S. does
about emissions reduction and what people do as individuals is totally trivial in face of the fact that China is adding huge amounts of coal fired generating capacity The most meaningful emissions reduction strategy today would be to convert China from coal to natural gas The claim that there are more frequent or more intense hurricanes and tornadoes as a result of AGW is not scientifically supported We can reduce emissions, but it is important that we do the RIGHT things (and NOT the WRONG ones) Not worried
about «peak oil;» coal can be converted to
liquid fuel
The DoD is the largest consumer of
liquid fuels on the planet, burning
about 375,000 barrels a day to
fuel over 500,000 vehicles, ships and aircraft.
People are even talking
about turning coal into
liquid fuel, which is a climate nightmare.
Worldwide, only
about 1 percent of the consumption of transport
fuels comes from
liquid biofuels.
And what
about the
liquid hydrogen
fuel used to power the Space Shuttle?
Biochar can be produced by pyrolysis at around 500 degrees C, either slowly (over days, the traditional approach e.g. in kilns), which results in
about equal amounts of biochar (
about 35 % of the original biomass),
liquid and gaseous
fuels; or rapidly (e.g. flash pyrolysis, in seconds), which gives less biochar (
about 15 % converted) less gaseous products, but more
liquid «bio-oil» products (
about 75 %).
Transportation, which accounts for
about 40 percent of the world's energy use, relies overwhelmingly on
liquid fuels produced from oil.
However, Carbon Sciences has developed a highly scalable process that provides a protected environment to organic biocatalysts, where they can go
about converting CO2 into
liquid fuels many times over with out «dying.»
A retired Air Force general talks with Midwest Energy News
about his solar - powered Wisconsin home and the case for developing alternative
liquid fuels.
They too have the diurnal problem under control — and they talk
about the very high temperatures and pressures they obtain being used in other process to produce
liquid fuels, which solve all the intermittency and transport problems (at a cost).
Will there be a negative comment
about ethanol or
liquid fuels in it?
At best CTL produces 2.3 barrels of
liquid fuel per ton of coal (there is
about 4 boe in a ton of typical bituminous coal).