And if it gets racing fans excited
about low carbon fuels and high fuel economy, even better.
Not exact matches
Motivations include concerns
about future demand for transport
fuels, growth opportunities in
low -
carbon technologies, and diversifying into power generation to secure demand for natural gas.»
«Investors in fossil
fuel companies are especially concerned
about how their businesses can succeed in a
low -
carbon economy.
A United Nations report released Sunday said that governments must act faster to keep global warming in check and that a radical shift from fossil
fuels to
low -
carbon energy such as wind, solar or nuclear power would shave only
about 0.06 of a percentage point a year off world economic growth.
«If the natural concentration had been a factor of two or more
lower, the climate impacts of fossil
fuel carbon dioxide release would have occurred
about 50 or more years sooner, making it much more challenging for the developing human society to scientifically understand the phenomenon of humanmade climate change in time to prevent it,» he says.
With this, they could make a series of predictions
about when
low -
carbon energy systems might catch up with traditional fossil -
fuel systems.
The California Air Resources Board (ARB) staff has updated
carbon intensities (CIs) and other information
about registered biorefineries, and posted the information at the
Low Carbon Fuel... Read more →
Coal - to - liquid
fuels with
carbon capture and storage could replace
about 15 — 20 % of current
fuel consumption in the transportation sector (2 — 3 million barrels per day; the
lower estimate holds if coal is also used to produce coal - and - biomass - to - liquid
fuels) and would have lifecycle CO2 emissions similar to petroleum - based
fuels.
However, we're a long way from the energy end - game, and there's still plenty of room for more of us to wise up to the power of solar in all of its many guises, whether we're talking
about delivering
low -
carbon cooking and water purification in the developing world or providing additional heat and zero -
fuel options to modern America.
I talk to stakeholders all over the globe, from strategic partners in Europe and Asia Pacific to engineers in Omaha,
about how to produce the
lowest cost
fuels and maximize
carbon credits in the market.
We don't know whether what you claim are benefits of «cheap» fossil
fuels can really be attributed to their
low cost or not, as we can't go back and check on every case as its price impacts work their way through the economy, nor can we speculate
about foregone benefits, or whether the benefits are due to the artificially reduced price of burning
carbon or whether people would enjoy them (or even greater benefits) in a fair market, except by examining by Capitalist analysis.
For decades, the fossil
fuel industry has used its influence to spread false or misleading information
about climate change — a strong motivation for choosing
low -
carbon energy sources like wind or solar (in addition to the economic reasons).
The original excitement
about fuel cell cars, many decades ago, came from the idea that we could electrolyze water with electricity from
low carbon sources like nuclear, solar, and wind, to make pure hydrogen to burn in the
fuel cells.
How
about estimating the social benefit of
carbon (i.e. of the access to a reliable
low - cost source of energy through fossil
fuels).
Make sure the temperatures in the transition from fossil
fuel use to
low carbon don't exceed prior Holocene of
about 1 C. Given that we are already at
about 0.8 C, with perhaps another degree or more built into the system from our prior commitments, that's
about as serious as it gets.
Besides, even if ethanol were a
low -
carbon fuel, the scale up proposed — biomass plantations covering «an area equal to
about one - sixth of the world's cropland» — would intensify the already perilous
fuel vs. food tradeoff and decimate millions of acres of forest and other wildlife habitat.