Sentences with phrase «about manuscript»

But the reason that we have decided to do some diagnostics comes from a number of questions we had about the manuscript:

Asking a series of questions about each manuscript they review.

I'm going to write a blog about the manuscript retreats as I've been getting a few questions about them.

There are many internet sources about manuscript format.

To learn more about Coliloquy, its authors, or learn about our manuscript submission process, visit www.coliloquy.com.

Beyond that, as I alluded to in the opening, there's sort of been a new expectation / conventional wisdom creeping up that the key to being a Good Hardworking Promoting Author is to blow out your blog, your Facebook page, your website, your Twitter feed, your Goodreads network, and better yet, all of the above and by the way you need to set up your own author tour and try to get some media appearances going we'd love it if you placed some articles and stories and where's your book trailer oh also don't quit your day job and don't forget about your manuscript deadline and make sure the next book is incredible and amazing and could you spend some time with your family please?

Information pertaining to profiles of publishers as well as their requirements about manuscript submission will often be provided exhaustively on their websites.

Learn more about my manuscript evaluation service.

If you're not getting any answers to your questions about your manuscript and its value to publishers, why not have a book industry professional review the first ten pages of your manuscript?

It is good to identify both what is familiar and unique about your manuscript.

Many of these editors aren't looking to dissuade a writer from publishing a manuscript and so, given that they get paid to edit, aren't necessarily going to be as upfront about a manuscript's shortcomings — not if it means putting themselves out of business.

How will you go about your manuscript submissions?

I have been contacted by litFire about a manuscript Xlibris published in 2008, and with which I've learned to bitterly dislike Xlibris.

Your points about manuscript length are true, and interesting.

It's probably your gut, your inner writer, raising a red flag about your manuscript.

This level of editing addresses some fundamental questions about your manuscript, such as:

If you have any hesitation about your manuscript or feel there's something not quite right about it, then I recommend the manuscript assessment.

They want to be excited about a manuscript and to have a successful and in - demand client.

It would be a disservice to the author if nothing about the manuscript excites the editor.

Ask your friends, writing group, or mentor to give you honest feedback about the manuscript.

Indeed, I will contact publishers by showing them a review on your book or an evaluation about your manuscript.

Therefore, provide your amateurs with a list of questions that you'd like them to answer about your manuscript.

We could be talking about a manuscript review which includes comments and feedback on bigger picture stuff.

It starts with a hook, details the facts about your manuscript (title, genre, word count), then elaborates on the plot as succinctly and specifically as possible.

I found him to be very clear in the suggestions he made about my manuscript.

A year went by and I finally emailed them asking about my manuscript and when it would be published.

The editor assigned to your book will get in contact with you shortly after you have made your payment with any questions he or she has for you about your manuscript and personal writing style.

What questions do you have about manuscript preparation that I haven't covered?

But I have talked with authors who've told me they paid it and, surprisingly, received detailed feedback about their manuscript that was worth more than ten times the fee.

Everyone from author to publisher could feel great about a manuscript and it fails all the same.

The authors wish to thank J. Patrick Meyer, Howard Bloom, and Steven Raudenbush for their comments about this manuscript.

For more information about manuscript submission or serving as reviewer, please email the editors at [email protected]

A detailed outline or annotated table of contents (one paragraph describing each chapter) and two or more completed chapters that represent what is unique and valuable about your manuscript

Here, you can state how you really «feel» about the manuscript.

Instead, focus on what is novel about the manuscript, the degree to which the paper's conclusions are supported by the data, and which parts you believe are not supported.

I shall not speak about biblical terminologies and do not need to be reminded about manuscripted religious flaws.

The lesson includes a link to a movie about manuscripts with Illuminated letters highlig...

Morgan has also acknowledged that they have plans to add essays about the manuscripts by leading scholars.

I spent Friday, Saturday and Sunday riffing with many of the five hundred writers in attendance about manuscripts, queries, pitches, proposals, platforms, print books, digital books, etc..

You wrote, «Harlequin can take a very long time to decide about manuscripts.

While we talk to our authors about their manuscripts, getting motivated is not relegated to just writing.

Not exact matches

Once you've read the manuscript out loud, marked the changes and done one full revision pass, then stop thinking about it for a few days.

This year, I'm feeling the birthday doldrums a little more acutely than usual since I've just about finished up the manuscript on my next book, Humans 3.0, which is all about how technology is affecting human nature.

Portions of some of the Apocryphal books were found among the dead sea scrolls: Starting in 1947, in the caves of the Qumran region about 14 miles East of Jerusalem, there were found in eleven separate caves, approximately 900 Manuscripts in some 25,000 pieces.

If this appears a rather rash statement, it is perhaps worth recalling just how problematic some of these sources can be when questions about the dating, provenance or dissemination are asked: the Similitudes of Enoch (1 Enoch 37 — 71) which contains so many crucial references to Christological titles otherwise thin on the ground elsewhere outside the New Testament (most notably the enigmatic «Son of Man»), is first attested only in a fifteenth - century Ethiopic manuscript.

Since then, an unpublished autobiographical manuscript about that conversion has come to light, establishing with some precision the time period when that conversion actually took place....

It limits the divine nature of Scripture to some non-existent manuscripts, and restricts the accurate understanding of Scripture to a few scholarly elites who study Greek and Hebrew while shut away from the rest of the world, and then tell all of us who are out in the world, how wrong and ignorant we are about what the Bible really means.

These manuscripts were representative of a much larger body of material which has since grown so extensively that today it includes about 70 papyri (portions written on papyrus), about 230 uncials (manuscripts with rounded letters), about 2,500 minuscules (manuscripts with small letters), and about 1,700 lectionaries (portions of Scripture arranged for worship).

We have manuscript evidence of the NT within 30 - 50 years of the time of the events... the closest for Homer is I believe about 600 years!!

It doesn't say anything about the veracity of the manuscript, no more than copies of Shakespeare contribute to proving that Romeo and Julliet happened.