In a letter, Mr. Collins said that previous answers from Facebook officials
about the misuse of data had been «misleading.»
Facebook changed its policy in 2015 after concerns
about misuse of data by third parties and a shift in strategy tied to its relationships with developers.
It can be argued easily that these steps are a long time coming, that Facebook shouldn't have had to be told
about misuse of data by reporters, and that it should have verified Cambridge Analytica had indeed purged user data years ago.
Since the report last weekend, several American and British lawmakers have called for greater privacy protection and asked Zuckerberg to explain what the company knew
about the misuse of its data.
Sen. Ron Wyden, also a member of the Senate Intelligence Committe, sent Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg a letter on Monday with a series of questions
about the misuse of its data.
Facebook changed its policy in 2015 after concerns
about misuse of data by third parties and a shift in strategy tied to its relationships with developers.
Not exact matches
Europeans will be able to tell companies to stop profiling them, they'll have much greater control over what happens to their
data, and they'll find it easier to launch complaints
about the
misuse of their information.
«Lots
of stories
about apps
misusing Apple
data, never seen Apple notify people,» Zuckerberg's notes say.
The Mercer family has not publicly commented since the reports
about the
misuse of Facebook
data by Cambridge first surfaced in The Times and The Observer.
The UK's digital minister, Matt Hancock, has also tweeted
about the
data misuse scandal — saying he will be meeting Facebook representatives next week and expects the company «to explain why they put the
data of over a million
of our citizens at risk».
The DCMS committee's enquiry began last year as a probe into «fake news» but has snowballed in scope as the scale
of concern around political disinformation has also mounted — including, most recently, fresh information being exposed by journalists
about the scale
of the
misuse of Facebook
data for political targeting purposes.
And make no mistake
about it: The business model
of a company like Facebook is surveillance; they're harvesting
data, and that
data can and will be
misused.
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg will be questioned by US lawmakers today
about the «use and abuse
of data» — following weeks
of breaking news
about a
data misuse scandal dating back to 2014.
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg will be questioned by US lawmakers today
about the «use and abuse
of data» — following weeks
of breaking news
about a
data misuse scandal dating back
Writing
about the
data misuse scandal in the Harvard Law Review, David Vladeck, the FTC's former director, argues there are now only two interpretations
of Facebook's actions vis - a-vis
data protection and user privacy: Cluelessness or venality.
Chris Wylie, the former Cambridge Analytica employee turned whistleblower whose revelations
about Facebook
data being
misused for political campaigning has wiped billions off the share value
of the co
«It was my mistake, and I'm sorry,» the 33 - year - old CEO said when questioned
about Facebook's
misuse of user
data.
The fallout from the story concerning Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, the
misuse of personal
data and how much Facebook knew
about all this, has quickly made its way into the halls
of government — and with it Facebook's CEO Mark Zuckerberg is getting a lot
of invitations in his inbox.
«You may have heard
about a quiz app built by a university researcher that leaked Facebook
data of millions
of people in 2014,» Zuckerberg said in the signed ads, referring to the
data analytics firm accused
of misusing the social network's user information during the 2016 US election.
The operator
of about 900 pubs across the U.K. and Ireland shut down its Twitter, Instagram and Facebook accounts on Monday, citing recent online «trolling»
of U.K. lawmakers and minorities, as well as concerns around
misuse of personal
data.
The centralization
of securities
data means investors are at much greater risk that their privacy will be breached or confidential information
about their investments will be
misused.
The social network has absorbed criticism in recent months regarding its personal
data security liabilities, thanks mainly to the
misuse of data from
about 87 million people collected on the social network by a research firm, Cambridge Analytica, during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Even before news reports emerged in recent days
about the potential
misuse of Facebook
data, federal regulators and Congress grappled with social media's growing influence on U.S. elections and the ways in which Russian operatives used the platforms to attempt to sow social unrest ahead
of the 2016 presidential contest.
The concerns
about potential
misuse of data and digital marketing to undermine privacy extend beyond Cambridge Analytica to firms across the political spectrum, says Jeff Chester, executive director for privacy watchdog group Center for Digital Democracy.
The company's stock has fallen
about 15 percent in the three weeks since Cambridge Analytica's
misuse of data became public.
Concerns
about misuse of user
data have emerged in countries like the U.S., but also in India.
He added: «22 May will be his opportunity to clarify allegations
about the unlawful coordination
of EU referendum campaigns, campaign spending, and
misuse of people's personal
data.»
Social networking company, Facebook says it has suspended
about 200 apps on its platform as part
of an investigation into
misuse of the
data of private...
Cambridge Analytica, a
data firm that worked for President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, is shutting down following allegations
about its
misuse of Facebook
data and the campaign tactics it pitched to clients.
The College Board, sponsor
of the SAT, was also dismayed to observe these
misuses of sat
data, because they reflect and perpetuate the erroneous perceptions
about the meaning and use
of SAT scores.
«Instead
of stimulating worthy discussions
about over-testing, cultural bias in tests, and the
misuse of test
data,» responded the anti-reform Network for Public Education in the Washington Post, «these activists would rather claim a false mantle
of civil rights activism.»
The groups are also concerned
about the possibility
of data breaches and potential unintentional
misuse or future inappropriate use
of the extensive private information
about children, families and school employees that will be gathered and stored.
Instead, testing
misuses must end because they cheat the public out
of accurate
data about public school quality at the same time they cheat many students out
of a high - quality education.»
Since the passage
of First to the Top legislation in 2010, as our organization has travelled across the state, we have heard from both parents and educators with concerns
about the collection, use and potential
misuse of student and teacher
data.
(Stephen Sawchuk
of Education Week is required reading for a pointed warning
about misuses of NAEP
data by education advocates seeking to bolster their own positions.)
At the recent State Department
of Education meeting in which a group
of school superintendents were instructed on how to mislead parents
about their right to opt out
of the Common Core SBAC testing scheme, one high ranking employee with the state department
of education mocked concerns
about the potential
misuse of the
data collected during the SBAC testing process.
Even if he accurately quoted the one little factoid he is so exercised
about, it is one little token
of data taken out
of context and
misused to bolster a vacuous argument.
These staggering developments have not only seriously dented public confidence in the ability
of public and private sector organisations to keep our personal
data secure, they have also reawakened concerns
about the extent to which our domestic laws provide adequate protection for individuals whose personal
data is lost or
misused.
Writing
about the
data misuse scandal in the Harvard Law Review, David Vladeck, the FTC's former director, argues there are now only two interpretations
of Facebook's actions vis - a-vis
data protection and user privacy: Cluelessness or venality.
The UK's digital minister, Matt Hancock, has also tweeted
about the
data misuse scandal — saying he will be meeting Facebook representatives next week and expects the company «to explain why they put the
data of over a million
of our citizens at risk».
At the China Development Forum this weekend, Apple CEO Tim Cook spoke
about Facebook's
misuse of customer
data, and sounded the call for stricter rules across the board on what companies are allowed to do with harvested information.
The tweet comes in the midst
of massive investigations into Facebook and Cambridge Analytica
about potentially
misused data scraped from millions
of Facebook users, and how that information may have been used to influence the 2016 US presidential election.
Chris Wylie, the former Cambridge Analytica employee turned whistleblower whose revelations
about Facebook
data being
misused for political campaigning has wiped billions off the share value
of the co
The past week's series
of revelations
about the
misuse of Facebook user
data by the election firm Cambridge Analytica has led to widespread calls for users to delete their accounts.
In March 2018, amid story after damaging story
about data - gathering and electoral manipulation using social media and increasing concerns over
misuse of Facebook
data for political purposes, a graphic that appeared online in March 2018 brought attention to how that information is tallied:
Allegations that research firm Cambridge Analytica
misused the
data of 50 million Facebook users have reopened the debate
about how information on the social network is shared and with whom.
The boss
of Cambridge Analytica, the analytics firm at the centre
of an international storm over the
misuse of Facebook user
data, has been caught on camera bragging
about how the company could blackmail political candidates with sex workers, and telling a prospective client that it has been secretly operating around the world to campaign in elections.
An early clue
about the potential for
misuse of Facebook's third - party developer tools came in 2010 when my colleague Emily Steel, then at The Wall Street Journal, reported that an online tracking company, RapLeaf, was collecting and reselling
data it had gathered from third - party Facebook apps to marketing firms and political consultants.
The Mercer family has not publicly commented since the reports
about the
misuse of Facebook
data by Cambridge first surfaced in The Times and The Observer.
The weekend's reports
about the
data misuse have prompted calls from lawmakers in Britain and the United States for renewed scrutiny
of Facebook, and at least two American state prosecutors have said they are looking into the
misuse of data by Cambridge Analytica.